SKINTACT WR01

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a 01,08 report with the FDA on 2010-03-31 for SKINTACT WR01 manufactured by Leonhard Lang Gmbh.

Event Text Entries

[1298887] On (b) (6) 2010, a 30 minutes vaginal hysterectomy was performed at (b) (6) hospital, (b) (6). An eschmann td 830 electrosurgical generator and a non monitoring dispersive electrode (model wr01) were used. The electrode was placed on the upper right thigh. The pt was in the lithotomy position and was not repositioned. The pt is normal (b) (6) built and has a normal dry skin. The skin was not cleaned, not disinfected and not shaving. Toward the end of the procedure, the surgeon noticed a loss in coagulation effect and shortly afterwards an alarm went off. It was discovered that the electrode had almost entirely come off. A line of blisters including a third degree burn of app 10 sqmm was discovered underneath. Another electrode of the same lot was applied on the other thigh and the procedure was completed. According to the info provided by the hospital the burn was not treated.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[8489585] The device in the incident and the retained samples of the same lot have been tested visually, electrically and thermally. Mechanical tests were performed on 3 retained samples (the device involved in the incident was in an state not suitable for the mechanical test). All samples were fine to perform within the limits. No faults could be detected. It appears that the user did not follow the ifu of the product: when a loss of coag was effect was not checked immediately but the power increased from 30 to 40 (user questionnaire and user incident report to (b) (6)). The ifu specifically states "should (. . . ) coagulation effect diminish during surgery (. . . ) a problem may exist. Immediately make sure that the dispersive electrode [=grounding plate] is (. . . ) in full contact with the skin. " the eschmann td830 is equipped with an electrode contact quality monitoring system, which only works with a monitoring electrode ("split"). An unsplit non-monitoring electrode was used. The ifu specifically states "if an electrosurgical unit offers an electrode cqms (. . . ) always use a split electrode. " the use of a split plate would have avoided the burn. Immediately checking the plate site when the loss of the coagulation effect was discovered might have reduced or avoided the burn. We, therefore, conclude that a user error, specifically not following the ifu, at least contributed to incident.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number8020045-2010-00001
MDR Report Key1651758
Report Source01,08
Date Received2010-03-31
Date of Report2010-03-26
Date of Event2010-02-24
Date Mfgr Received2010-02-25
Device Manufacturer Date2009-11-01
Date Added to Maude2010-04-08
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA0
Event Location0
Manufacturer ContactMR. BURRHUS LANG
Manufacturer StreetARCHENWEG 56
Manufacturer CityINNSBRUCK 6020
Manufacturer CountryAU
Manufacturer Postal6020
Manufacturer Phone12334257
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameSKINTACT
Generic NameELECTROSURGICAL GROUNDING PLATE
Product CodeODR
Date Received2010-03-31
Returned To Mfg2010-03-18
Model NumberWR01
Catalog NumberWR01
Lot Number91127-0813
Device Expiration Date2012-11-30
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityY
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrN
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerLEONHARD LANG GMBH
Manufacturer AddressARCHENWEG 56 INNSBRUCK 6020 AU 6020


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2010-03-31

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.