MAUDE MDR 24277294

MDR report key
24277294
Report number
3027394506-2026-00002
Event key
0
Event type
3
Date of event
2026-01-28
Date received
2026-02-06
Adverse event
0
Product problem
1
Patients in event
0
Reporter occupation
100
Health professional
1
Initial report to FDA
0
Event location
0

Manufacturer Contact#

Contact
BDX FAHMY RAZAK - MDR
Address
155 NORTH MCCARTHY BOULEVARD MILPITAS CA 95035 US
Phone
877-877-8772
Report source
M

Devices#

Seq, Brand, Generic table
SeqBrandGenericManufacturerProduct codeModelCatalogLotPMA510(k)ImplantEvaluatedAvailability
299171BD FACS? SAMPLE PREP ASSISTANT IIIAUTOMATED PIPETTING, DILUTING AND SPECIMEN PROCESSING WORKSTATIONS FOR FLOW CYTOBECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, BD BIOSCIENCESPER647205YN

Patients#

Sequence, Received, Treatment table
SequenceReceivedTreatmentOutcome
12026-02-060

Event Narratives#

N

Patient 0

H.3. A DEVICE EVALUATION AND/OR DEVICE HISTORY REVIEW IS ANTICIPATED BUT IS NOT COMPLETE. UPON COMPLETION, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FILED.

D

Patient 0

IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF BD FACS? SAMPLE PREP ASSISTANT III, FOREIGN MATTER/CONTAMINATION IN INSTRUMENT THAT IMPACTED PATIENT RESULTS WAS OBSERVED. CONTAMINANT IS IN A POSITION WHERE IT IMPACTED A READOUT TO BE USED CLINICALLY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT SAMPLES NOT BEING PROCESSED CORRECT. CUSTOMER REPLACED SYRINGE BUT ISSUE PERSISTS. PATIENT SAMPLES CHECKLIST: 1. DID THIS CAUSE ERRONEOUS RESULTS ON PATIENT SAMPLES FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING? IF YES, GO TO QUESTION #2. IF NO, NO FURTHER QUESTIONS REQUIRED. YES. 2. WAS AN ERRONEOUS LABORATORY RESULT FROM THE BDB PRODUCT REPORTED TO A CLINICIAN? IF YES, GO TO QUESTION #3. IF NO, NO FURTHER QUESTIONS REQUIRED. NO. CONTAMINATION: 1. WERE PATIENT SAMPLES CONTAMINATED OR WAS THERE CARRYOVER (CROSS-CONTAMINATION/MIXING) BETWEEN PATIENT SAMPLES? IF NO, NO FURTHER QUESTIONS REQUIRED. PATIENT SAMPLES CONTAMINATED, CARRYOVER BETWEEN PATIENT SAMPLES, UNKNOWN - GO TO QUESTION #2. PATIENT SAMPLES CONTAMINATED. 2. PLEASE DESCRIBE ANY ADDITIONAL DETAILS: GO TO PATIENT SAMPLES CHECKLIST. SAMPLES WERE NOT PROPERLY PROCESSED AND THERE WAS A RED TINGE (BLOOD) TO THE COMPLETED SAMPLES. CUSTOMER IDENTIFIED THIS IS NOT CORRECT SO THEY STOPPED USING SYSTEM. CUSTOMER THEN MANUALLY PROCESSED SAMPLES BY HAND.

D

Patient 0

IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING USE OF BD FACS? SAMPLE PREP ASSISTANT III, FOREIGN MATTER/CONTAMINATION IN INSTRUMENT THAT IMPACTED PATIENT RESULTS WAS OBSERVED. CONTAMINANT IS IN A POSITION WHERE IT IMPACTED A READOUT TO BE USED CLINICALLY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT. THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED BY THE INITIAL REPORTER: IT WAS REPORTED BY THE CUSTOMER THAT SAMPLES NOT BEING PROCESSED CORRECT. CUSTOMER REPLACED SYRINGE BUT ISSUE PERSISTS. PATIENT SAMPLES CHECKLIST: 1. DID THIS CAUSE ERRONEOUS RESULTS ON PATIENT SAMPLES FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING? IF YES, GO TO QUESTION #2. IF NO, NO FURTHER QUESTIONS REQUIRED. YES. 2. WAS AN ERRONEOUS LABORATORY RESULT FROM THE BDB PRODUCT REPORTED TO A CLINICIAN? IF YES, GO TO QUESTION #3. IF NO, NO FURTHER QUESTIONS REQUIRED. NO. CONTAMINATION: 1. WERE PATIENT SAMPLES CONTAMINATED OR WAS THERE CARRYOVER (CROSS-CONTAMINATION/MIXING) BETWEEN PATIENT SAMPLES? IF NO, NO FURTHER QUESTIONS REQUIRED. PATIENT SAMPLES CONTAMINATED, CARRYOVER BETWEEN PATIENT SAMPLES, UNKNOWN - GO TO QUESTION #2. PATIENT SAMPLES CONTAMINATED 2. PLEASE DESCRIBE ANY ADDITIONAL DETAILS: GO TO PATIENT SAMPLES CHECKLIST. SAMPLES WERE NOT PROPERLY PROCESSED AND THERE WAS A RED TINGE (BLOOD) TO THE COMPLETED SAMPLES. CUSTOMER IDENTIFIED THIS IS NOT CORRECT SO THEY STOPPED USING SYSTEM. CUSTOMER THEN MANUALLY PROCESSED SAMPLES BY HAND.

N

Patient 0

THE FOLLOWING FIELD WAS UPDATED WITH CORRECTED INFORMATION: H.6 IMDRF ANNEX G: G04135 VALVE(S). H.6 INVESTIGATION SUMMARY: BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION RESULTS, THE REPORTED ISSUE OF THE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCING SAMPLES NOT BEING PROCESSED AFTER TESTING WAS CONFIRMED. INVESTIGATION RESULTS THAT WERE PERFORMED ON THE INDICATED FAILURE MODE WERE THE FOLLOWING: THE COMPLAINT TREND AND SERVICE NOTES WERE REVIEWED. THE POTENTIAL CAUSE FOR THE CUSTOMER EXPERIENCING SAMPLES NOT BEING PROCESSED WAS LINKED TO THE 4-WAY VALVE. THE ISSUE WAS RESOLVED AFTER THE PART WAS REPLACED. THE REPLACED PART WAS NOT RETURNABLE; THEREFORE, IT WAS DISCARDED. NO FURTHER PROBLEMS WERE NOTED, AND THE INSTRUMENT WAS CONFIRMED TO BE FUNCTIONING AS EXPECTED. ALTHOUGH THE INSTRUMENT WAS USED FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING, THE ISSUE WAS RESOLVED BEFORE THE PATIENT SAMPLE RESULTS WERE USED FOR ANY DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT.