ACCESS? PROGESTERONE 33550

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a 01,05,06 report with the FDA on 2013-02-19 for ACCESS? PROGESTERONE 33550 manufactured by Beckman Coulter.

Event Text Entries

[3187813] The affiliate reported the customer alleged elevated progesterone results, for sixteen patients, on separate days, involving the unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system used in conjunction with access progesterone assay. The customer stated the unexpected shift in progesterone values (above the laboratory's protocols of 1 ng/ml) were not observed in the past. Subsequent analyses of the patient's samples, on the same analyzer, recovered similar elevated results. Additional analysis of the patient's samples, through an alternate methodology, recovered lower progesterone results within the customer's expectation. The elevated results were released out of the laboratory. As a result, the patient's ivf (in vitro fertilization) embryo transfer cycles were cancelled. There has been no report of additional patient treatment or current patient outcome to date. The customer will supply beckman coulter with several patient's samples for further analysis. This is report thirteen of sixteen, referencing patient #13.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[10570254] Service was not dispatched as the customer did not question system performance. During the ivf procedure, the physician administered the following medications: gonadotropin releasing hormone (gnrh) analogues: lucrin, decapeptyl. Gnrh antagonists: orgalutran, cetrotide. Rec. Fsh: gonal f, puregon. Urinary: menogon, merional, menopur, metrodin hp. A review of the customer-supplied quality control (qc) data from (b)(4) 2013 indicates the percent coefficient of variation (cv) for the low control is 19%, which is higher than the minimal essential cv of 18% at 1. 1 pg/ml as stated in the access immunoassay post-market release performance data. The laboratory's expectation is 21% cv at 0. 81 pg/ml. Level 2 qc percent coefficient of variation was at 6. 5%, which appears to be within the cv requirements. System check, from (b)(4) 2013, was within expectations. Assay calibration, from 01/09/2013, passed within specifications. At present, beckman coulter continues to investigate this reported event. All related medwatch reports associated with this event: 2122870-2013-00134, 2122870-2013-00135, 2122870-2013-00136, 2122870-2013-00137, 2122870-2013-00138, 2122870-2013-00139, 2122870-2013-00140, 2122870-2013-00141, 2122870-2013-00142, 2122870-2013-00143, 2122870-2013-00144, 2122870-2013-00145, 2122870-2013-00146, 2122870-2013-00147, 2122870-2013-00148, 2122870-2013-00149.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[10865222] Beckman coulter further reviewed low level quality control (qc) between the involved unicel dxi 800 system and another unicel dxi 800 instrument over an approximately (b)(4) time frame. Both units produced reproducible qc results over four reagent pack lots, total data points of (b)(4). There is no overall imprecision claim for this assay, however, this data is within the imprecision as defined by (b)(4). (b)(4). In conclusion to the investigation, the customer interpreted the progesterone assay performance against literature references in the ivf protocols. The literature references are citing the progesterone response as calibrated vs. The current (b)(4) reference methodology for calibration of the assay. Based on this investigation, the customer could best be served by conversion to the access p4de calibration. The progesterone assay associated is functioning as intended. Results of the investigation indicate that the incident is associated with the progesterone assay in lieu of the unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system. The customer has not reported any additional incidents or similar incidents over the past year.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[20407093] Additional information: beckman coulter received two patient samples from the customer for investigation. The samples were sent to an external laboratory for testing on an alternate methodology. Testing confirmed the progesterone results, on the alternate methodology, were lower than the customer's progesterone values originally obtained on the unicel dxi 800 access immunoassay system. There was inadequate patient sample to repeat the testing on the unicel dxi 800 system or perform any additional investigation. Results with an alternative methodology (cobas-roche): sample 1: 0. 685 ng/ml (<1. 0 ng/ml); sample 2: 1. 37 ng/ml (<1. 5 ng/ml).
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number2122870-2013-00146
MDR Report Key2968872
Report Source01,05,06
Date Received2013-02-19
Date of Report2013-01-24
Date of Event2012-04-04
Date Mfgr Received2013-02-20
Device Manufacturer Date2012-07-01
Date Added to Maude2013-02-20
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA0
Event Location0
Manufacturer ContactMS. DUNG NGUYEN
Manufacturer Street250 S. KRAEMER BLVD.
Manufacturer CityBREA CA 92821
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal92821
Manufacturer Phone7149614941
Manufacturer G1BECKMAN COULTER
Manufacturer Street1000 LAKE HAZELTINE DRIVE
Manufacturer CityCHASKA MN 55318
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal Code55318
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameACCESS? PROGESTERONE
Generic NameRADIOIMMUNOASSAY, PROGESTERONE
Product CodeJLS
Date Received2013-02-19
Model NumberNA
Catalog Number33550
Lot Number222209
ID NumberSOFTWARE VERSION V4.4
Device Expiration Date2013-12-31
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityY
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrN
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerBECKMAN COULTER
Manufacturer Address250 S. KRAEMER BLVD. BREA CA 92821 US 92821


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2013-02-19

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.