D
Patient 1
DEVICE REPORT FROM SYNTHES (B)(4) REPORTS AN EVENT IN (B)(6) AS FOLLOWS: IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2014 A PROXIMAL FEMORAL NAIL ANTIROTATION WAS USED FOR AN INTERTROCHANTERIC FEMORAL FRACTURE CASE. AFTER SEVERAL CHECKS OF THE DEVICE BY ASSEMBLING WITH NAIL BEFORE IMPLANTATION, THE NAIL WAS INSERTED. AFTER THAT, WHEN THE GUIDE WIRE WAS INSERTED IT THEN INTERFERED WITH THE NAIL. THE SURGEON TRIED TO INSERT THE GUIDE WIRE AGAIN, BUT THE SITUATION DID NOT CHANGE. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE NAIL AND DID SEVERAL DRY CHECKS AGAIN. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NAIL WENT INTO THE ERRATIC POSITION AGAINST THE NAIL HOLE. AT THAT POINT, A NEW GUIDE WIRE WAS REPLACED. AFTER THAT, THE OPERATION WAS COMPLETED AS PER THE NORMAL PROCEDURE AND WITHOUT ANY ADDITIONAL PROBLEMS. THERE WAS A FIFTEEN MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY REPORTED. THIS COMPLAINT IS FOR 3 OF 3 COMPLAINT (B)(4).