MAINFRAME RESPONSE 2.0 8252001IP

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a 06,07,company representative, report with the FDA on 2014-04-10 for MAINFRAME RESPONSE 2.0 8252001IP manufactured by Medtronic Xomed, Inc..

Event Text Entries

[4223725] It was reported that the nim was making? Constant noise.? This issue occurred approximately 1. 5 hours into case (surgery unknown) and resulted in the site cancelling the case due to too much artifact. Reportedly, "the nim2. 0 was working fine for about an hour into the case. It randomly starting beeping on all channels and then [the users] notice[d] the box had moved from its original location. They confirmed electrodes were connected, and wrapped the box in a towel. They still received random responses even when not touching the patient. " the follow-up contact was not sure of any details about the potentially rescheduled surgery or clinical impact, and the initial report indicated there was no patient injury.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[11812871] This device is used for therapeutic purposes. (b)(4). The product has not been returned for analysis. Method: no testing methods performed.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[22908502] The device was returned on (b)(4) 2014. The device was analyzed on (b)(4) 2014. The product analysis states,? Shake test was performed on the mainframe; no loose parts were heard. The interface, simulator and probe were connected and the mainframe turned on; boot-up sequence completed with no errors. Touchscreen responded. A monitoring mode was selected using all available channels. Each channel was stimulated in turn; normal and appropriate responses were seen on all channels. The stim setting was changed using the probe; system responded appropriately. Electrode check was within acceptable ranges for all channels, stim 1 and 2, and ground. The unit was placed in the burn-in oven for 24 hours in an attempt to duplicate the failure but it functioned normally.? (b)(4).
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[101039480] If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number1045254-2014-00079
MDR Report Key3738435
Report Source06,07,COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,
Date Received2014-04-10
Date of Report2014-03-19
Date of Event2014-03-19
Date Mfgr Received2014-05-07
Device Manufacturer Date2007-01-01
Date Added to Maude2014-04-10
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactAMY CORRALES
Manufacturer Street6743 SOUTHPOINT DRIVE NORTH
Manufacturer CityJACKSONVILLE FL 32216
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal32216
Manufacturer Phone9043328138
Manufacturer G1MEDTRONIC XOMED, INC
Manufacturer Street6743 SOUTHPOINT DRIVE NORTH
Manufacturer CityJACKSONVILLE FL 32216
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal Code32216
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameMAINFRAME RESPONSE 2.0
Generic NameSTIMULATOR, NERVE
Product CodeIKN
Date Received2014-04-10
Returned To Mfg2014-04-24
Model Number8252001IP
Catalog Number8252001IP
Lot Number48446200
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityR
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerMEDTRONIC XOMED, INC.
Manufacturer Address6743 SOUTHPOINT DRIVE NORTH JACKSONVILLE FL 32216 US 32216


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2014-04-10

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.