INTERNAL RACK M1043-68001

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a 04,05,06,07 report with the FDA on 1996-09-24 for INTERNAL RACK M1043-68001 manufactured by Hewlett-packard Co..

Event Text Entries

[7760181] Analysis: the internal rack was returned to co for analysis. The unit was received in two separate halves, showing no anomalies or mechanical defects. All fourteen interlocking tabs appeared normal. The unit was reassembled using the normal manufacturing processes. The eval of the reassembled unit showed no anomalies. The rack was then disassembled and mechanically inspected. No problems were discovered. Pull tests on the fully assembled rack were unsuccessful in separating the two halves. The rack was turned over to the manufacturing engineering for their analysis. Experiments were performed to investigate the possibility that the top seven out of fourteen mechanical interlocks were not completely engaged. The results from these experiments indicated that with the rack partially assembled, the electrical integrity between the rack and rack interface connection is interrupted. No communication between the rack and the cmu was possible in this partially assembled state. Conclusion: the experiments performed on the returned internal rack were inconclusive. The rack exhibited no signs of mechanical fatigue or failure. Intentionally misassembling the rack resulted in loss of communication between the front end modules and the cmu. The cms is not functional in this mode. Equipment inop alarms would be generated in this mode of operation. The equipment has been in service for two years with no reports of rack specific failures. A review of co's service records doesn't show any similar occurrence of this problem.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[15378224] While the pt was being monitored by the m1046a component monitoring system, the m1043-68001 internal rack which locks into the computer module came apart. The front end assembly with modules separated from the rear cover and fell upon the pt. The front end assembly turned in mid-air in such a manner that the circuit card struck the pt on the left side of the face near the jaw bone causing abrasions of the skin. The unit continued until it struck the collar bone in the left clavicle area, causing a small cut in the skin. The pt was given an x-ray examination. There were no further injuries.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number1218950-1996-00006
MDR Report Key39765
Report Source04,05,06,07
Date Received1996-09-24
Date of Report1996-09-24
Date of Event1996-09-10
Date Facility Aware1996-09-10
Report Date1996-09-24
Date Reported to Mfgr1996-09-11
Date Mfgr Received1996-09-11
Device Manufacturer Date1994-09-01
Date Added to Maude1996-09-30
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag0
Reporter OccupationBIOMEDICAL ENGINEER
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Single Use3
Remedial ActionIN
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameINTERNAL RACK
Generic NameINTERNAL RACK
Product CodeMOY
Date Received1996-09-24
Model NumberM1043-68001
Catalog NumberM1043-68001
Lot Number*
ID Number*
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityY
Device Age24 MO
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Implant FlagN
Date RemovedA
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key40899
ManufacturerHEWLETT-PACKARD CO.
Manufacturer Address3000 MINUTEMAN RD ANDOVER MA 01810 US
Baseline Brand NameINTERNAL RACK
Baseline Generic NameINTERNAL RACK
Baseline Model NoM1043-68001
Baseline Catalog NoM1043-68001
Baseline ID*
Baseline Device FamilyINTERNAL RACK
Baseline Shelf Life ContainedA
Baseline PMA FlagN
Baseline 510K PMNY
Premarket NotificationK882609
Baseline PreamendmentN
Baseline TransitionalN
510k ExemptN


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 1996-09-24

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.