IMPLANT, FIXATION DEVICE, SPINAL

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a 01,03,07 report with the FDA on 2015-01-07 for IMPLANT, FIXATION DEVICE, SPINAL manufactured by Synthes Usa.

Event Text Entries

[5436301] This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature abstract: horsting, p. , et al (2011). Peek-cages in lumbar fusion: mid-term clinical and radiological outcome. From december 2004 until august 2007, a total of 95 patients (21 double level, 74 single level) with degenerative disc disease from l3 to s1 were operated on. The primary outcome measure was re-operation. Secondary outcome measures were bony bridging within the cage based on ct-scan and clinical improvement measured by the oswestry score. The median duration of follow-up was 47. 7 months (range 29. 9? 61. 6 months). In total 24 patients (25. 3%) were re-operated after a mean of 21. 9 months (range 6. 7-46. 9) of the initial surgery. Twenty-three patients (18 single-level, 5 double-level) were re-operated for symptomatic pseudarthrosis and one patient for a deep wound infection. In one double-level patient both levels were pseudarthrotic. A ct scan was performed in 89 patients (109 out of 116 levels; 94%); 43 levels (39. 4%) in 41 patients were pseudarthrotic. The mean oswestry score improved from 28. 1 to 16. 0. No relation has been found between the oswestry score and radiological outcome in this population. In this review, a high number of reoperations after an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (alif) procedure with the synfix-lr cage was found, mainly due to pseudoarthrosis. In the opinion of the authors, the absence of posterior fixation may have lead to insufficient initial stability, creating suboptimal conditions for bony bridging, and thus solid fusion. This report is against an unknown number of synfix-lr cages regarding pseudarthrosis and a deep wound infection.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[12736537] The device was used for treatment, not diagnosis. Horsting, p. , et al (2011). Peek-cages in lumbar fusion: mid-term clinical and radiological outcome. This report is for unknown synfix-lr cages/unknown quantity/unknown lot number. (b)(6). The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided. If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate. (b)(4).
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number2520274-2015-10075
MDR Report Key4390277
Report Source01,03,07
Date Received2015-01-07
Date of Report2014-12-10
Date Mfgr Received2014-12-10
Date Added to Maude2015-01-07
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag0
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA0
Event Location0
Manufacturer ContactLINDA PLEWS
Manufacturer Street1302 WRIGHTS LANE EAST
Manufacturer CityWEST CHESTER PA 19380
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal19380
Manufacturer Phone6107195000
Manufacturer CountryUS
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Generic NameIMPLANT, FIXATION DEVICE, SPINAL
Product CodeJDN
Date Received2015-01-07
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityN
Device Eval'ed by MfgrR
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerSYNTHES USA
Manufacturer Address1302 WRIGHTS LANE EAST WEST CHESTER, PA 19380 US 19380


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Required No Informationntervention 2015-01-07

© 2025 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.