INFORCE REINFORCEMENT MESH (FORTAFLEX MESH)

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a 05 report with the FDA on 2015-07-15 for INFORCE REINFORCEMENT MESH (FORTAFLEX MESH) manufactured by Organogenesis, Inc..

Event Text Entries

[6011125] On (b)(6) 2015, the complaints manager from integra life sciences, notified organogenesis that info had been received from a sales rep from mountain medical indicating that following a tendon repair surgery in the foot where inforce was used, the "wound started to dehisce a month after it had healed". This info was initially received as part of a medical inquiry from the sales rep to integra product manager and no add'l details regarding the event were provided. On (b)(6) 2015, add'l info was provided from the sales rep in response to f/u inquiries that indicated the graft had been removed, however, no add'l detail was provided at that time. On (b)(6) 2015, oi was provided with info obtained from the treating clinician that verified that a revision surgery had been performed and the tendon had been debrided and the product had been removed. Add'l details regarding the event were also provided by the treating clinician at that time. The treating clinician reported. "pt was taken to surgery on (b)(6) 2015 scheduled for a primary repair of a achilles tendon tear. A v to y gastroc recession was also provided. The intergra inforce graft was used. The first graft opened was deemed to be too small for the watershed correction. The smaller graft was placed to reinforce the gastroc recession and a larger graft was place about the watershed repair. The pt was placed in a posterior splint. Sutures were removed on (b)(6) 2015 and the surgical site was deemed to be well healed. The pt was placed in a short leg fiberglass cast, non-weight bearing. On (b)(6) 2015, the pt was seen with a complaint of sanguineous drainage. Cast was removed and a dehiscence was documented at the watershed. The wound was cultured and the pt was then placed in a posterior splint. Would care efforts continued with compression dressings. A cluster of smaller wounds later developed about the proximal incision over the gastroc recession where second graft was placed. The pt was eventually referred to plastics and the tendon was later debrided and all graft product was removed surgically with the debridement of the tendon. The wound and incision promptly healed thereafter".
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number1221816-2015-00004
MDR Report Key4920918
Report Source05
Date Received2015-07-15
Date of Report2015-07-15
Date of Event2015-01-26
Date Mfgr Received2015-04-20
Device Manufacturer Date2012-12-28
Date Added to Maude2015-07-20
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA0
Event Location0
Manufacturer ContactPATRICK BILBO, SVP, REGULATORY AN
Manufacturer Street150 DAN RD.
Manufacturer CityCANTON MA 02021
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal02021
Manufacturer Phone7814011155
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameINFORCE REINFORCEMENT MESH (FORTAFLEX MESH)
Generic NameSURGICAL MESH
Product CodeMGR
Date Received2015-07-15
Lot NumberIF121126GA
Device Expiration Date2015-05-31
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityN
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrR
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerORGANOGENESIS, INC.
Manufacturer AddressCANTON MA US


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Required No Informationntervention 2015-07-15

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.