SOLOGRIP III HANDPIECE HP-SG3

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a company representative,health report with the FDA on 2016-04-14 for SOLOGRIP III HANDPIECE HP-SG3 manufactured by Cryolife, Inc..

Event Text Entries

[42753928] This investigation is currently ongoing. Any additional information will be provided in the follow-up report.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[42753929] According to the report, "[surgeon] was performing a stand alone tmr on (b)(6) 2016. Sologrip iii handpiece tip was frayed, handpiece would not work. Staff opened up another sologrip iii handpiece and [surgeon] continued the tmr without incident. "
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[47647495] According to the report, "[surgeon] was performing a stand alone tmr on (b)(6) 2016. Sologrip iii handpiece tip was frayed, handpiece would not work. Staff opened up another sologrip iii handpiece and [surgeon] continued the tmr without incident. " a sample review was conducted on (b)(6) 2016. The returned handpiece was visually inspected. The hospital returned handpiece ta-04043-68; however, the original packaging was not returned. The optical multi-filament fiber portion on the distal end was discolored and appeared frayed. The polypropylene outer covering was not fully encapsulating the optical multi-filament and looked as though it had been melted or burned back. Other than this observation, no other evidence of damage or defects could be noted on the handpiece. When the multi-filament fiber was retracted there was not any portion of it visible, indicating that a portion was missing. The end of the optical multi-filament fiber appeared charred as though it may have been fired. There was debris noted on the inside of the silicone stabilizing cup on the distal end of the handpiece. The guideshaft was cut open at the distal end and examined. It was not possible to determine if there was any charring present due to the diameter of the guideshaft. It looked like the laser had been test fired against a metal object or that it had been fired before the optical multi-filament fiber was fully extended. A test was done on an additional handpiece trying to re-create the damage noted on ta-04043-68. The laser was fired inside a metal basin against the metal without fully extending the fiber (the bowl had water in it but the distal tip was not submerged in the water). The result was the optical multi-filament became charred and there was debris noted inside the silicone stabilizing cup similar to the damage noted on the returned handpiece. The root cause cannot be determined, however, the damage noted is consistent with damage that would occur if the laser was test fired against a metal object and or fired before the optical multi-filament fiber was fully extended. On (b)(6) 2016 an email was sent seeking additional information relating to when the operating room staff noticed the frayed tip and if they tried to use it. An email response was received on (b)(6) 2016 stating, "the surgeon did try to use the handpiece with the frayed tip. It was when he was using it that he noticed the frayed tip. There was no impact to the patient, we used a different handpiece. " the manufacturing records for lot ta-04043 were reviewed and it was confirmed that all records were controlled, available for review, and met all specifications per the device master record. The ifu states, "fill a small non-metallic water basin with water approximately half full. Note: usage of too little water or a metal basin could result in damage to the test fiber or injury to the user. Ensure the optical fiber is in contact with the surface of the water/saline to protect the fiber while testing. Ensure the optical fiber does not come into contact with the walls of the container. "
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[47647497] According to the report, "[surgeon] was performing a stand alone tmr on (b)(6) 2016. Sologrip iii handpiece tip was frayed, handpiece would not work. Staff opened up another sologrip iii handpiece and [surgeon] continued the tmr without incident. "
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number1063481-2016-00041
MDR Report Key5576463
Report SourceCOMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,HEALTH
Date Received2016-04-14
Date of Report2016-06-16
Date of Event2016-03-11
Date Mfgr Received2016-03-17
Date Added to Maude2016-04-14
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactROCHELLE MANEY
Manufacturer Street1655 ROBERTS BLVD., NW
Manufacturer CityKENNESAW GA 30144
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal30144
Manufacturer Phone7704193355
Manufacturer G1CRYOLIFE, INC.
Manufacturer Street1655 ROBERTS BLVD., NW
Manufacturer CityKENNESAW GA 30144
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal Code30144
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameSOLOGRIP III HANDPIECE
Generic NameTRANSMYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION LASER HANDPIECE
Product CodeMNO
Date Received2016-04-14
Returned To Mfg2016-03-28
Model NumberHP-SG3
Lot NumberTA-04043
Device Expiration Date2016-05-31
OperatorPHYSICIAN
Device AvailabilityR
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerCRYOLIFE, INC.
Manufacturer Address1655 ROBERTS BLVD., NW KENNESAW GA 30144 US 30144


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2016-04-14

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.