DISTAFLO MINI-CUFF EPTFE VASCULAR BYPASS GRAFT DFX8006SC

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a company representative,foreig report with the FDA on 2016-09-19 for DISTAFLO MINI-CUFF EPTFE VASCULAR BYPASS GRAFT DFX8006SC manufactured by Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc..

Event Text Entries

[55054918] No medical records or no medical images have been made available to the manufacturer. The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation. As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed. The investigation of the reported event is currently underway. The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time. Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[55054919] It was reported that the vascular bypass graft allegedly tore during implantation in the femoral popliteal artery. Reportedly, another graft was used to complete the procedure. There was no reported patient injury.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[58762597] Manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed with special attention to the subassemblies, material review reports, raw material testing, manufacturing process, and quality control inspection. This lot met all release criteria. There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event. This is the only complaint that has been reported for this corporate lot number to date. Visual inspection: the device was returned in two segments. The two segments had two blue lines running down the length of the graft and carbon inner lining, thus identifying them as bard products. Trace amounts of fluid were visible along the body of the graft segments that were returned. The first segment measured approximately 1. 1cm in length. No suture holes were identified. The beading was peeled off throughout most of the entire length of the segment. The segment was torn spirally in two locations along the beading track. The second segment measured approximately 1. 4cm in length. No suture hold, tears, or rips were identified throughout the length of the segment. The beading was intact throughout the entire length of the segment. Dimensional evaluation: segments of the graft measured approximately 2. 5cm in total length. The length specification is 80cm +5/-0cm. This measurement was below specification. Therefore, the entirety of the graft was not returned for evaluation. Medical records review: medical records were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed. Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided; therefore, a review could not be performed. Conclusion: the investigation is confirmed for torn material, as partial circumferential tears were observed along the beading track of the returned segment. It is unknown if procedural issues contributed to the reported event. Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown. Labeling review: the current ifu states: precautions: when removing the external spiral support (beading) of the distaflo? Graft, the beading must be removed slowly and at a 90? Angle to the graft. Rapid unwinding and /or removal at less than a 90? Angle may result in graft damage. Do not use surgical blades or sharp, pointed instruments to remove the beading as this may damage the graft wall. If damage occurs, that segment of the graft should not be used. The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time. Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[58762598] It was reported that the vascular bypass graft allegedly tore during implantation in the femoral popliteal artery. Reportedly, another graft was used to complete the procedure. There was no reported patient injury.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number2020394-2016-00879
MDR Report Key5960366
Report SourceCOMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,FOREIG
Date Received2016-09-19
Date of Report2016-08-24
Date of Event2016-08-24
Date Mfgr Received2016-10-20
Device Manufacturer Date2015-12-08
Date Added to Maude2016-09-19
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactJUDITH LUDWIG
Manufacturer Street1625 W 3RD ST.
Manufacturer CityTEMPE AZ 85281
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal85281
Manufacturer Phone4803032689
Manufacturer G1BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Manufacturer Street1625 W 3RD ST.
Manufacturer CityTEMPE AZ 85281
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal Code85281
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameDISTAFLO MINI-CUFF EPTFE VASCULAR BYPASS GRAFT
Generic NameEPTFE VASCULAR BYPASS GRAFT
Product CodeDYF
Date Received2016-09-19
Returned To Mfg2016-09-07
Catalog NumberDFX8006SC
Lot NumberVTZL0267
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityR
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerBARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Manufacturer Address1625 W 3RD ST. TEMPE AZ 85281 US 85281


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
10 2016-09-19

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.