SMART RELIEF TENS THERAPY KNEE AND SHOULDER

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a consumer,health professional report with the FDA on 2016-10-27 for SMART RELIEF TENS THERAPY KNEE AND SHOULDER manufactured by Chattem.

Event Text Entries

[58504337] Initial information regarding this unsolicited device case from united states was received from a healthcare professional (a patient itself) on 17-oct-2016. This case involves a female patient of unknown age, whose back was burned and blistered (burn was right near the left side of the spine), unspecified time after she started using smart relief tens therapy (smart relief tens therapy knee and shoulder). No information about past drugs were reported. On unknown date in (b)(6) 2016, the patient started therapy with smart relief tens therapy at an unspecified frequency (lot/batch number with expiry date: unknown; control unit serial number: 1503232691511) for spine ruptured pain. Patient stated her spine ruptured a while ago and this was the most pain she had in 6 years. She stated she bought device on 16-oct-2016 along with refill kit. Patient stated she never used this device before. She stated she just uses the regular icy hot for pain (concomitantly use). Patient stated her back was burned and blistered (onset date: (b)(6) 2016; latency: unknown). Reportedly, when she used the device (smart relief tens therapy) made her back so much more worse. She stated she could not use the heating paid or the regular icy hot she used before buying smart relief tens therapy. Patient stated she really has to get to the emergency room (er). She stated the burn was right near the left side of the spine on her back. Patient stated she made sure area was clean before putting on device. She stated she could not sleep because her back hurts; also hurts when she takes a showers. Patient stated she said to her husband it felt like a really bad sun burn. She stated this was hindering her recovery. Action taken: drug withdrawn in (b)(6) 2016. Corrective treatment: not reported. Outcome: not reported. Seriousness criteria: important medical event for both the events.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[58619957] Initial information regarding this unsolicited device case from united states was received from a healthcare professional (a patient itself) on (b)(6) 2016. This case involves a female patient of unknown age, whose back was burned and blistered (burn was right near the left side of the spine), had application site paresthesia (tingling) and application site scab (wound was starting to scab), unspecified time after she started using smart relief tens therapy (smart relief tens therapy knee and shoulder). No information about past drugs were reported. On unknown date in (b)(6) 2016, the patient started therapy with smart relief tens therapy at an unspecified frequency (lot/batch number with expiry date: unknown; control unit serial number: (b)(4)) for spine ruptured pain. Patient stated her spine ruptured a while ago and this was the most pain she had in 6 years. She stated she bought device around noon on (b)(6) 2016 along with refill kit as she had strained a muscle in my lower back and into the left hip. She never used this device before. She had just used the regular icy hot for pain (concomitantly use). Reportedly, the unit was on the lowest setting/ first intensity level for 30 minutes. She did not have any icy hot product on her skin when she applied the pad as she had taken a shower and was putting on clean skin. In the middle of the first cycle which was on lowest setting, she felt as though her skin was tingling (onset date: (b)(6) 2016; latency unknown) and burning. She adjusted the pad slightly to the left while still on the first cycle and could no longer take the stinging. She removed the pad and was in serious pain from the burns. As the night went on the appearance of the burns and the pain worsened. Her back was burned and blistered (onset date: (b)(6) 2016; latency: unknown). She had never used any product such as icy hot or a heating pad after applying the pad to her skin. She could not sleep because her back hurts; also hurts when she takes a showers and sleeping and sitting was painful. Reportedly, when she used the device (smart relief tens therapy) made her back so much more worse. She stated she could not use the heating paid or the regular icy hot she used before buying smart relief tens therapy. She was still in alot of pain with the muscle pull and burns and went to the emergency room (er) on (b)(6) 2016. She went to er for pain in her back not for the burn. The burn was right near the left side of the spine on her back. The doctor treated her and she was recommend to use cold soaks on her back and vaseline as she had the burn and the wound started to scab (onset date and latency unknown) and was itching which meant it was healing and would take time to go away. She recommended cool compresses instead of hot due to the burns. Patient stated she said to her husband it felt like a really bad sun burn. She stated this was hindering her recovery and recovery was taking a little longer. Action taken: permanently discontinued in (b)(6) 2016. Corrective treatment: not reported for application site scab and application site paresthesia. Outcome: not reported. Seriousness criteria: important medical event for both the events. Qa review findings: all retains are examined for correct packaging, seal, missing components, working control unit, legibility of lot numbers /expiration date, correct label and foreign matter. No anomalies were found that could contribute to this complaint. Awaiting device return for additional investigation. Additional information was received from the quality department on 17-oct-2016, 18-oct-2016, 19-oct-2016, 20-oct-2016 and 21-oct-2016 (all information processed together with csd of 17-oct-2016): events added application site scab and application site paresthesia added, symptom of stinging, itching and redness added, corrective treatment added and action taken updated from drug withdrawn nos to permanently discontinued. Text updated accordingly.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[59375100] Initial information regarding this unsolicited device case from united states was received from a healthcare professional (a patient itself) on 17-oct-2016. This case involves a female patient of unknown age, whose back was burned and blistered (burn was right near the left side of the spine), had application site paresthesia (tingling) and application site scab (wound was starting to scab), unspecified time after she started using smart relief tens therapy (smart relief tens therapy knee and shoulder). No information about past drugs was reported. On unknown date in (b)(6) 2016, the patient started therapy with smart relief tens therapy at an unspecified frequency (lot/batch number with expiry date: unknown; control unit serial number: (b)(4)) for spine ruptured pain. Patient stated her spine ruptured a while ago and this was the most pain she had in 6 years. She stated she bought device around noon on (b)(6) 2016 along with refill kit as she had strained a muscle in my lower back and into the left hip. She never used this device before. She had just used the regular icy hot for pain (concomitantly use). Reportedly, the unit was on the lowest setting/first intensity level for 30 minutes. She did not have any icy hot product on her skin when she applied the pad as she had taken a shower and was putting on clean skin. In the middle of the first cycle which was on lowest setting, she felt as though her skin was tingling (onset date: (b)(6) 2016; latency unknown) and burning. She adjusted the pad slightly to the left while still on the first cycle and could no longer take the stinging. She removed the pad and was in serious pain from the burns. As the night went on the appearance of the burns and the pain worsened. Her back was burned and blistered (onset date: (b)(6) 2016; latency: unknown). She had never used any product such as icy hot or a heating pad after applying the pad to her skin. She could not sleep because her back hurts; also hurts when she takes a showers and sleeping and sitting was painful. Reportedly, when she used the device (smart relief tens therapy) made her back so much more worse. She stated she could not use the heating paid or the regular icy hot she used before buying smart relief tens therapy. She was still in a lot of pain with the muscle pull and burns and went to the emergency room (er) on (b)(6) 2016. She went to er for pain in her back not for the burn. The burn was right near the left side of the spine on her back. The doctor treated her and she was recommend to use cold soaks on her back and vaseline as she had the burn and the wound started to scab (onset date and latency unknown) and was itching which meant it was healing and would take time to go away. She recommended cool compresses instead of hot due to the burns. Patient stated she said to her husband it felt like a really bad sun burn. She stated this was hindering her recovery and recovery was taking a little longer. She had to go back to the doctor to get a prescription cream for the burn. The burn was on her back area where she buttons her pants. It was a really bad burn and had hindered her recovery. When she sits down the wombs reopen, no hot water could touch the womb. The burn was almost gone. Also she reported that the burn was in the scaly and itchy stage and it felt like sand paper. Also, the doctor gave her a prescription for 1 mint silver sulfadiazine twice a day. She also stated that the area for burn was so big that the doctor had to do a refill which they normally did not do. Action taken: permanently discontinued in (b)(6) 2016 corrective treatment: not reported for application site scab and application site paresthesia. Outcome: recovering for application site burn. Unknown for other events seriousness criteria: important medical event for application site burn and application site blister qa review findings: all retains are examined for correct packaging, seal, missing components, working control unit, legibility of lot numbers /expiration date, correct label and foreign matter. No anomalies were found that could contribute to this complaint. Awaiting device return for additional investigation. Additional information was received from the quality department on 17-oct-2016, 18-oct-2016, 19-oct-2016, 20-oct-2016 and 21-oct-2016 (all information processed together with csd of 17-oct-2016): events added application site scab and application site paresthesia added, symptom of stinging, itching and redness added, corrective treatment added and action taken updated from drug withdrawn nos to permanently discontinued. Text updated accordingly. Follow-up information was received on 24-oct-2016: no new information was received. Additional information was received on 24-oct-2016, 27-oct-2016 and 28-oct-2016 (all information processed together with csd of 27-oct-2016): the outcome for application site burn and corrective updated. Information regarding event was added and text updated accordingly. Pharmacovigilance comment: sanofi company comment dated 03-11-2016: this case involves an adult female patient who reported application site blistered while on treatment with smart relief tens therapy. Although the causal role of the drug cannot be denied for the reported events, however lack of information of latency, any preexisting injury over the application site, concurrent medical condition and personal history preclude a comprehensive assessment in this case.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[71132581] Initial information regarding this unsolicited device case from united states was received from a healthcare professional (a patient itself) on 17-oct-2016. This case involves a (b)(6) female patient, whose back was burned and blistered (burn was right near the left side of the spine), had application site paresthesia (tingling) and wound was starting to scab and scar on back, unspecified time after she started using smart relief tens therapy (smart relief tens therapy knee and shoulder). Concurrent conditions: hypertension, allergic rhinitis, anxiety, asthma, bipolar 1 disorder, carpal tunnel syndrome, chemical burn of trunk, chronic lower back pain, congenital septal defect of heart, cough present for greater than 3 weeks, depression, fatigue, folliculitis, hives, hyperlipidemia, knee pain, major depressive episode, microalbuminuria, nausea, post concussion syndrome, urticaria, ventricular septal defect, vertigo. Medical history: acute sinusitis, head injury, sprain of wrist, rectal hemorrhage, urinary tract infection, spinal discectomy, patient had surgery for cauda equina 6 years ago and did have complications during surgery which included a brain bleed-caused memory deficits and dizziness at times: carpal tunnel, anxiety. Patient denied history of alcohol use and patient was non-smoker. Concomitant medications: alprazolam, atenolol, escitalopram oxalate, lamotrigine, montelukast sodium, salbutamol sulfate (proair hfa), simvastatin and trazodone hydrochloride it was reported that patient was doing tricks with her hula hoop and pulled her back. The pain was so severe that she had trouble walking and moving around. On unknown date in (b)(6) 2016, the patient started therapy with smart relief tens therapy at an unspecified frequency (lot/batch number with expiry date: unknown; control unit serial number: (b)(4)) for spine ruptured pain. Patient had pain in lower back and pain radiation location was lower hip. The pain effected sleep and alleviating factors for pain were reported as: banding to pick something up, rising from chair, lifting leg into bed or scooting in bed, sitting for a long time and standing for a long time. Patient stated her spine ruptured a while ago and this was the most pain she had in 6 years. She stated she bought device around noon on (b)(6) 2016 along with refill kit as she had strained a muscle in my lower back and into the left hip. She never used this device before. She had just used the regular icy hot for pain (concomitantly use). Reportedly, the unit was on the lowest setting/first intensity level for 30 minutes. She did not have any icy hot product on her skin when she applied the pad as she had taken a shower and was putting on clean skin. In the middle of the first cycle which was on lowest setting, she felt as though her skin was tingling (onset date: (b)(6) 2016; latency unknown) and burning. She adjusted the pad slightly to the left while still on the first cycle and could no longer take the stinging. She removed the pad and was in serious pain from the burns. As the night went on the appearance of the burns and the pain worsened. Her back was burned and blistered (onset date: (b)(6) 2016; latency: unknown). She had never used any product such as icy hot or a heating pad after applying the pad to her skin. She could not sleep because her back hurts; also hurts when she takes a showers and sleeping and sitting was painful. Reportedly, when she used the device (smart relief tens therapy) made her back so much more worse. She stated she could not use the heating paid or the regular icy hot she used before buying smart relief tens therapy. She was still in a lot of pain with the muscle pull and burns and went to the emergency room (er) on (b)(6) 2016. She went to er for pain in her back not for the burn. The burn was right near the left side of the spine on her back. The doctor treated her and she was recommend to use cold soaks on her back and vaseline as she had the burn and the wound started to scab (onset date and latency unknown) and was itching which meant it was healing and would take time to go away. She recommended cool compresses instead of hot due to the burns. Patient stated she said to her husband it felt like a really bad sun burn. She stated this was hindering her recovery and recovery was taking a little longer. Patient had scar on back from tens site about 8 cm x 12 cm. She had to go back to the doctor to get a prescription cream for the burn. The burn was on her back area where she buttons her pants. It was a really bad burn and had hindered her recovery. When she sits down the wombs reopen, no hot water could touch the womb. The burn was almost gone. Also she reported that the burn was in the scaly and itchy stage and it felt like sand paper. Also, the doctor gave her a prescription for 1 mint silver sulfadiazine twice a day. She also stated that the area for burn was so big that the doctor had to do a refill which they normally did not do. Action taken: permanently discontinued in (b)(6) 2016 corrective treatment: not reported for application site scab and application site paresthesia. Outcome: recovering for application site burn. Unknown for other events. Seriousness criteria: important medical event for application site burn and application site blister. Qa review findings: all retains are examined for correct packaging, seal, missing components, working control unit, legibility of lot numbers /expiration date, correct label and foreign matter. No anomalies were found that could contribute to this complaint. Awaiting device return for additional investigation. Additional information was received from the quality department on 17-oct-2016, 18-oct-2016, 19-oct-2016, 20- oct-2016 and 21-oct-2016 (all information processed together with csd of 17-oct-2016): events added application site scab and application site paresthesia added, symptom of stinging, itching and redness added, corrective treatment added and action taken updated from drug withdrawn nos to permanently discontinued. Text updated accordingly. Follow-up information was received on 24-oct-2016: no new information was received. Additional information was received on 24-oct-2016, 27-oct-2016 and 28-oct-2016 (all information processed together with csd of 27-oct-2016): the outcome for application site burn and corrective updated. Information regarding event was added and text updated accordingly. Follow-up information was received on 06-nov-2016 from a consumer: no new information was received. Follow-up information was received on 18-nov-2016 from a consumer: no new information was received. Additional information was received on 03-mar-2017 from hcp: age of patient added, medical history, concurrent conditions and concomitant medications added. Onset of application site burn updated. Event verbatim for application site scab updated. Clinical course was updated. Pharmacovigilance comment: sanofi company comment for follow up dated 03-03-2017: this case concerns a (b)(6) female patient who reported application site blister while on treatment with smart relief tens therapy. Although the causal role of the drug cannot be denied for the reported events, however lack of information of latency, past drugs and personal history preclude a comprehensive assessment in this case. Additionally, patient's medical history of chemical burn of trunk, folliculitis act as confounders for the same.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number1022556-2016-00006
MDR Report Key6059933
Report SourceCONSUMER,HEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Date Received2016-10-27
Date of Report2016-10-17
Date of Event2016-10-16
Date Mfgr Received2017-03-03
Date Added to Maude2016-10-27
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactHEATHER SCHIAPPACASSE
Manufacturer Street55 CORPORATE DRIVE 55B-220A
Manufacturer CityBRIDGEWATER NJ 08807
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal08807
Manufacturer Phone9089817289
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameSMART RELIEF TENS THERAPY KNEE AND SHOULDER
Generic NameTRANSCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATOR
Product CodeNUH
Date Received2016-10-27
OperatorLAY USER/PATIENT
Device Availability*
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerCHATTEM
Manufacturer Address1715 WEST 38TH STREET CHATTANOOGA TN 37409 US 37409


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2016-10-27

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.