RECOVERY CONE REMOVAL SYSTEM FBRC

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a company representative,health report with the FDA on 2016-11-09 for RECOVERY CONE REMOVAL SYSTEM FBRC manufactured by Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc..

Event Text Entries

[59499907] No medical records or no images have been made available to the manufacturer. As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed. The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation. The investigation of the reported event is currently underway. The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time. Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[59499910] It was reported that during a scheduled retrieval of a vena cava filter, the filter was captured and retrieved into the sheath; however, during removal of the retrieval system from the patient, slight resistance was met and the radiopaque marker band allegedly detached and was located in the right atrium as demonstrated by final fluoroscopy. The marker band was retrieved approximately two hours after discovery of the detachment with approximately 80 minutes of fluoroscopy. The patient was reportedly doing well post procedure.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[65598870] Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing. This lot met all release criteria. There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event. This is the only event reported to date for this lot number and failure mode. Visual inspection: the device was returned. The sheath was returned cut. The distal sheath segment was cut longitudinally. The cuts in the sheath will be considered an incidental finding as it appears that the sheaths were cut by the user. The marker band was returned detached from the sheath. The distal marker band impression was identified on the appropriate location. Several prongs were found to be bent and separated from the polyurethane cone. It should be noted that the recovery cone is not designed to retrieve denali filters. Functional/performance evaluation: functional testing was not performed due to the condition of the returned sample. Medical records review: medical records were not provided for review. Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided for review. Conclusion: the device was returned. Based on the returned sample condition, a detached marker band from the recovery cone sheath can be confirmed. The prongs on the cone were found to be bent and separated from the urethane cone; therefore, the investigation was confirmed for bent and material separation. It should be noted that per the reported event, the recovery cone was used to retrieve a denali filter. Per the denali ifu (instructions for use), the denali filter should be removed using an intravascular loop snare only. The recovery cone is only indicated for use to percutaneously remove the g2 x filter, g2 express filter, g2 filter and the recovery filter from the vena cava, or facilitate the retrieval of foreign objects from the peripheral vascular system. The recovery cone is not indicated for use to remove a denali filter. Therefore, it is likely that user related issues (use of a recovery cone to remove a denali filter) contributed to the alleged marker band detachment. Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: do not attempt to remove the recovery? Filter, recovery? G2? Filter or g2? X filter if significant amounts of thrombus are trapped within the filter or if the filter tip is embedded within the vena caval wall. Do not use excessive force when manipulating the cone. Excessive force may damage the catheter or other parts of the recovery cone removal system. If resistance is experienced during the retrieval procedure, check the captured filter and introducer sheath using fluoroscopy. Directions for use: after the cone has been opened superior to the filter, advance the cone over the filter tip by holding the introducer catheter stationary and advancing the pusher shaft. It is recommended to obtain an anterior-oblique fluoroscopic image to confirm that the cone is over the filter tip. Close the cone over the filter tip by advancing the introducer catheter over the cone while holding the pusher shaft stationary. Continue advancing the introducer catheter over the cone until the cone is within the introducer catheter. With the cone collapsed over the filter, remove the filter by stabilizing the introducer catheter and retracting the pusher shaft in one, smooth, continuous motion. The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time. Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[65598871] It was reported that during a scheduled retrieval of a vena cava filter, the filter was captured and retrieved into the sheath; however, during removal of the retrieval system from the patient, slight resistance was met and the radiopaque marker band allegedly detached and was located in the right atrium as demonstrated by final fluoroscopy. The marker band was retrieved approximately two hours after discovery of the detachment with approximately 80 minutes of fluoroscopy. The patient was reportedly doing well post procedure.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


[66375865] The event was reported via medwatch report #(b)(4). Manufacturing review: the device history records were reviewed with special attention to the raw materials, subassemblies, manufacturing process and quality control testing. This lot met all release criteria. There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event. This is the only event reported to date for this lot number and failure mode. Visual inspection: the device was returned. The sheath was returned cut. The distal sheath segment was cut longitudinally. The cuts in the sheath will be considered an incidental finding as it appears that the sheaths were cut by the user. The marker band was returned detached from the sheath. The distal marker band impression was identified on the appropriate location. Several prongs were found to be bent and separated from the polyurethane cone. It should be noted that the recovery cone is not designed to retrieve denali filters. Functional/performance evaluation: functional testing was not performed due to the condition of the returned sample. Medical records review: medical records were not provided for review. Image/photo review: images/photos were not provided for review. Conclusion: the device was returned. Based on the returned sample condition, a detached marker band from the recovery cone sheath can be confirmed. The prongs on the cone were found to be bent and separated from the urethane cone; therefore, the investigation was confirmed for bent and material separation. It should be noted that per the reported event, the recovery cone was used to retrieve a denali filter. Per the denali ifu (instructions for use), the denali filter should be removed using an intravascular loop snare only. The recovery cone is only indicated for use to percutaneously remove the g2 x filter, g2 express filter, g2 filter and the recovery filter from the vena cava, or facilitate the retrieval of foreign objects from the peripheral vascular system. The recovery cone is not indicated for use to remove a denali filter. Therefore, it is likely that user related issues (use of a recovery cone to remove a denali filter) contributed to the alleged marker band detachment. Labeling review: the current ifu (instructions for use) states: warnings: do not attempt to remove the recovery? Filter, recovery? G2? Filter or g2? X filter if significant amounts of thrombus are trapped within the filter or if the filter tip is embedded within the vena caval wall. Do not use excessive force when manipulating the cone. Excessive force may damage the catheter or other parts of the recovery cone removal system. If resistance is experienced during the retrieval procedure, check the captured filter and introducer sheath using fluoroscopy. Directions for use: after the cone has been opened superior to the filter, advance the cone over the filter tip by holding the introducer catheter stationary and advancing the pusher shaft. It is recommended to obtain an anterior-oblique fluoroscopic image to confirm that the cone is over the filter tip. Close the cone over the filter tip by advancing the introducer catheter over the cone while holding the pusher shaft stationary. Continue advancing the introducer catheter over the cone until the cone is within the introducer catheter. With the cone collapsed over the filter, remove the filter by stabilizing the introducer catheter and retracting the pusher shaft in one, smooth, continuous motion. The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time. Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[66375866] It was reported that during a scheduled retrieval of a vena cava filter, the filter was captured and retrieved into the sheath; however, during removal of the retrieval system from the patient, slight resistance was met and the radiopaque marker band allegedly detached and was located in the right atrium as demonstrated by final fluoroscopy. The marker band was retrieved approximately two hours after discovery of the detachment with approximately 80 minutes of fluoroscopy. The patient was reportedly doing well post procedure.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number2020394-2016-01045
MDR Report Key6089326
Report SourceCOMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,HEALTH
Date Received2016-11-09
Date of Report2016-10-13
Date of Event2016-10-13
Date Mfgr Received2017-01-16
Date Added to Maude2016-11-09
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactJUDITH LUDWIG
Manufacturer Street1625 W 3RD ST.
Manufacturer CityTEMPE AZ 85281
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal85281
Manufacturer Phone4803032689
Manufacturer G1C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
Manufacturer Street289 BAY ROAD
Manufacturer CityQUEENSBURY NY 12804
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal Code12804
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameRECOVERY CONE REMOVAL SYSTEM
Generic NameVENA CAVA FILTER REMOVAL SYSTEM
Product CodeGAE
Date Received2016-11-09
Returned To Mfg2016-10-18
Catalog NumberFBRC
Lot NumberGFYD2719
Device Expiration Date2017-05-31
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityR
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerBARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Manufacturer Address1625 W 3RD ST. TEMPE AZ 85281 US 85281


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Life Threatening; 2. Other; 3. Required No Informationntervention 2016-11-09

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.