SLINGS, CLIP MAA4100M-L

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a company representative,user f report with the FDA on 2017-04-13 for SLINGS, CLIP MAA4100M-L manufactured by Arjohuntleigh Polska Sp Z O.o.

Event Text Entries

[72805139] (b)(4). An investigation was carried out into this complaint. It was reported that one of sling clips being used with maxi sky 600 ceiling lift broke whilst hooking up on the device spreader bar before commencing to the patient transfer. Fortunately, no injuries were sustained by patient or caregiver. When reviewing similar reportable events, we have found cases with similar fault description (clip breakage). The involved sling was inspected by arjohuntleigh representative -the sling label was found to be completely unreadable. Therefore we cannot determine its manufacturing date with a certainty. We were not provided with any pictures of this faulty item either. Unfortunately, it is not possible to determine the sling condition, neither location of the broken clip. It was informed that the customer facility have been trained in terms of replacing slings when their tags are no longer readable. Please note that passive sling clip instruction for use (ifu)includes the following warning: "before every use: (... ) check all parts of the sling. If any part is missing or damaged - do not use the sling. Check for: fraying, loose stitching, tears, fabric holes, soiled fabric, damaged clips, unreadable or damaged label. " this may point to the facility staff not knowing of the necessity of the pre-use checks as indicated in the ifu, which in turn makes it unlikely the pre-use check were followed. From previous investigations into similar problems, it is concluded that the damage to the clip is not likely to have occurred during or due to on-label use. All sling clips outperform their specification, except when damaged. There is the statement on the sling label itself, but also in the corresponding ifu, that the sling is not to be dried with a washing press or similar method. This is because doing so can mean that the clip receives a mechanical pressure much higher and from a different position (outside rather than inside) than it was intended for. It can cause bending, deforming, hairline cracks or even outright breakages of the clip before or during use. Following the ifu - "cleaning: (... ) do not wash with rough surfaces or sharp objects, (... ), use any mechanical pressure, pressing or rolling, (... ) tumble dry, ironing. " despite the sling label was unreadable, this does not appear to be the reason for clip breakage. The clip breakage is found most likely due to further off-label use: not following the washing and drying instructions. Based on the information received regarding the incident and our product knowledge it comes forward that we see clip breakage occur in three general ways: from left to right, from top to bottom and at the lower bar (the weakest part of the clip). A breakage here is what is expected to occur when a clip is pinched with a force much higher than the force it will normally receive during use. This occurs when a clip is bent in e. G. : a washing press, with enormous force, while the left and right sides of the clip are pushed on. From this evaluation it would appear most likely that the event was caused by the user not following the ifu, due to lack of awareness of the ifu's contents. Arjohuntleigh suggests additional reminding the staff involved of the device labelling, with special attention to correct washing procedure and proper sling inspection for damages before each patients transfer. This is to be communicated to the customer. Looking at the incident scenario, it is found the device was being used for treatment of the patient when the event occurred and it was directly involved with the reportable incident. It was decided to be reportable to the competent authorities in abundance of due to the fact that such circumstances with patient attached on the sling upon recurrence may result in harm of high severity. The device was not up to its specification at the time of the event - the arjohuntleigh sling clip got broken.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[72805140] On (b)(6) 2017 it was reported to arjohuntleigh that one of sling clips being used with maxi sky 600 ceiling lift broke whilst hooking up with resident before transfer. No injuries were sustained.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number3007420694-2017-00083
MDR Report Key6489999
Report SourceCOMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,USER F
Date Received2017-04-13
Date of Report2017-04-13
Date of Event2017-03-17
Date Facility Aware2017-03-20
Report Date2017-04-13
Date Reported to FDA2017-04-13
Date Reported to Mfgr2017-04-13
Date Mfgr Received2017-03-20
Date Added to Maude2017-04-13
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMS. KINGA STOLINSKA
Manufacturer StreetKS. WAWRZYNIAKA 2
Manufacturer CityKOMORNIKI, 62-052
Manufacturer CountryPL
Manufacturer Postal62-052
Manufacturer Phone698 282 46
Manufacturer G1ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP Z O.O
Manufacturer StreetKS. WAWRZYNIAKA 2
Manufacturer CityKOMORNIKI, 62-052
Manufacturer CountryPL
Manufacturer Postal Code62-052
Single Use3
Remedial ActionIN
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameSLINGS, CLIP
Generic NameDAILY ACTIVITY ASSIST DEVICE
Product CodeIKX
Date Received2017-04-13
Catalog NumberMAA4100M-L
OperatorOTHER CAREGIVERS
Device AvailabilityY
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP Z O.O
Manufacturer AddressKS. WAWRZYNIAKA 2 KOMORNIKI, 62-052 PL 62-052


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2017-04-13

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.