EVOLUTION ELECTRONIC CONSERVER OM-900A

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a company representative,foreig report with the FDA on 2017-05-31 for EVOLUTION ELECTRONIC CONSERVER OM-900A manufactured by Inovo. Inc.

Event Text Entries

[76319036] The device reported in this event (conserver, oxygen, product code: ne, model om-900a, serial number: (b)(4)) was received on 09/24/2015 at inovo's manufacturing facility in (b)(4). This device was tested and analyzed per the device control plan 561. The device was inspected and disassembled and was noted with visible burn marks at the inlet of the yoke. The brass insert had visible damage along the edge of the diameter. The sintered bronze filter sustained no visual burn damage. The cylinder post valve had visible damage along the sealing surface. There was also metal removed/pitted from the sealing surface exposing the brass under the stainless steel plating. Black residue was also noted along the top and sides of the brass insert, but no indication of the flash fire penetrating through the sintered bronze filter. No residue was noted at the sintered inlet filter. The seal washer that was recovered from the ignition was completely disintegrated leaving only remnants of the brass ring. Analysis determined the likely scenario was that flow friction may have been the cause of the fire. It was reported that there were multiple attempts to connect the conserver to the oxygen cylinder with reported air leaks. It can be concluded that the repeated attempts to connect meant that the conserver was not properly connected each time. These repeated attempts would result to the damage to the sealing surface. The instructions for use (ifo) states that the post valve of the oxygen cylinder and the conserver should be inspected prior to connection and to not use if there is any damage to the sealing surfaces of the conserver and oxygen cylinder. In addition per the home use checklist, if a leak is not fixed after one additional attempt, reconnect should be attempted. If after two failed attempts to connect the conserver, the patient is instructed to contact the company in which they purchased the unit from. The most likely root cause was that the operator damaged the sealing surface with the repeated attempts to connect the device to the oxygen cylinder and did not inspect the sealing surface after each subsequent connection attempt. The pitting/opening could not create sufficient seal and gas was seeping out through the opening of the pitted area causing flow friction sufficient enough to cause a flash fire. A review of the device history record did not show any nonconformities or issues during the manufacturing process. This mdr is being submitted based as a result of a voluntary two-year retrospective review that was performed to identify potentially reportable complaints. There was no report that an inovo device caused or contributed to an adverse event where death, serious injury, or a significant public health hazard has occurred or may occur if the alleged malfunction were to reoccur; however, this event is being reported in an abundance of caution. If inovo becomes aware of additional information that would affect reportability, a supplemental will be submitted. Note that this mdr was previously submitted on 01/28/2017 and is being re-submitted because it was not fully processed or received by fda due to an error.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[76319037] It was reported that the customer was in a vehicle at the time of the incident and was switching over the device from an empty cylinder to a full cylinder. The device was connected and after turning on the cylinder valve, a leak was noticed. The cylinder valve was turned off and reconnected to the device two more times. On the last attempt, a hiss was heard that got louder, and then flashed with a flame. The customer jumped out of the car and then quickly turned the cylinder valve off to prevent a fire. There were no reported adverse patient effects. No additional information provided.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number1062191-2017-00003
MDR Report Key6602668
Report SourceCOMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,FOREIG
Date Received2017-05-31
Date of Report2015-09-22
Date of Event2015-05-28
Date Mfgr Received2015-09-24
Device Manufacturer Date2013-10-15
Date Added to Maude2017-05-31
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMRS. MARITA BURST
Manufacturer Street401 LEONARD BLVD NORTH
Manufacturer CityLEHIGH ACRES FL 33971
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal33971
Manufacturer Phone2396436577
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameEVOLUTION ELECTRONIC CONSERVER
Generic NameEVOLUTION ELECTRONIC CONSERVER
Product CodeNFB
Date Received2017-05-31
Returned To Mfg2016-11-07
Model NumberOM-900A
Device AvailabilityR
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerINOVO. INC
Manufacturer Address401 LEONARD BLVD. N LEHIGH ACRES FL 33971 US 33971


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
10 2017-05-31

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.