LIPIFLOW THERMAL PULSATION SYSTEM LFD-1000 220100

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a company representative,health report with the FDA on 2017-08-02 for LIPIFLOW THERMAL PULSATION SYSTEM LFD-1000 220100 manufactured by Tearscience, Inc..

Event Text Entries

[81589623] Concomitant medical products: of the meibomian glands at the same treatment visit as the lipiflow. A superficial corneal abrasion may or may not result in permanent damage of the cornea if left untreated. However, a permanent injury in the absence of medical management cannot be ruled out. The lipiflow cannot also be ruled out as a possible contributing factor in the development of the abrasion. As such, we elected to report the event. The activator used for the treatment (lfd-1000) was discarded by the practice after the treatment. However, there was no indication that a pre-treatment inspection of the activator revealed any defects in the activator or packaging, the activator passed the automated self-test of the device and the device records indicate that the treatment operated according to the intended specifications. This case is complicated by several factors: the patient had a history suggestive of undiagnosed recurrent corneal erosion (sporadic episodes of pain and inflammation lasting for a few hours especially in the evening). Rce is a listed contraindication in the labeling. The patient received manual expression and lipiflow on the event day, both requiring the use of proparacaine which is known to irritate the corneal epithelium. Manual expression involves physical manipulation & pressure applied to eyelid. The treatment plan, to place a contact lens and additional proparacaine over a cornea with 'trace spk' is unusual and likely itself to result in disruption of the corneal epithelium. It is not known how much the patient used the proparacaine between leaving and returning to the office. The lipiflow system activator (disposable), which is a component of the lipiflow system, is the medical device suspected to have contributed to the patient injury. Ocular surface irritation or inflammation (e. G. Corneal abrasion, conjunctival edema or conjunctival injection (hyperemia)) and ocular symptoms (e. G. Burning, stinging, tearing, itching, discharge, redness, foreign body sensation, visual disturbance, sensitivity to light) are listed as potential adverse effects that can occur as a result of the procedure involving the lipiflow system. (b)(4).
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[81589624] The patient had a diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction, dry eye and moderate to severe chronic allergic conjunctivitis. The patient history was suspicious for undiagnosed recurrent corneal erosion. The patient was treated with the lipiflow followed by manual expression of the meibomian glands on the same day. After both treatments, the patient reported feeling 'watery and scratchy' in the left eye. The medical records shows that 'trace spk' was observed on the left eye. A bandage contact lens was placed on the left eye for the 'trace spk'. The patient was also given proparacaine drops to use as needed twice or three times a day along with lotemax (lotemax was prescribed to manage the patient's dry eye). The patient was instructed to return to the office in a few weeks for her routine follow up post-lipiflow and manual expression. A few hours later the patient returned to the office reporting pain. The bandage lens was then removed. Mild corneal edema was noted on the chart. The patient was prescribed topical steroid drops to use every 2 hours and she was referred to corneal specialist the next day. The corneal specialist diagnosed the patient with a superficial corneal abrasion and treated her prophylactically with an antibiotic drop, four times a day, for three days along with a topical steroid drop, twice a day, for 14 days. At the follow up exam after 3 days, the patient cornea was notably improved and it continued to heal over the next 2 weeks. Three weeks after the adverse event the cornea was documented as normal and the best corrected vision in the left eye was documented as 20/20. Comparison of the subjective refraction findings from 2 weeks prior to the lipiflow and manual expression and at both the optometrist and ophthalmologists offices after the treatment day indicate that the patient experienced a change in her prescription from her current older glasses. The prescription change in the left eye was larger than that in the right eye. The refractive data between the two offices were not fully consistent. There are no post-treatment keratometry data available. The patient has not received or required any additional medical intervention since (b)(6) 2017.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number3008169506-2017-00001
MDR Report Key6759764
Report SourceCOMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,HEALTH
Date Received2017-08-02
Date of Report2017-08-01
Date of Event2017-06-01
Date Mfgr Received2017-06-09
Date Added to Maude2017-08-02
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Reporter OccupationOTHER HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMR. STEPHEN BEVERSLUIS
Manufacturer Street5151 MCCRIMMON PARKWAY SUITE 250
Manufacturer CityMORRISVILLE NC 27560
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal27560
Manufacturer Phone9194594831
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameLIPIFLOW THERMAL PULSATION SYSTEM
Generic NameEYELID THERMAL PULSATION SYSTEM
Product CodeORZ
Date Received2017-08-02
Model NumberLFD-1000
Catalog Number220100
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityN
Device Eval'ed by MfgrR
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerTEARSCIENCE, INC.
Manufacturer Address5151 MCCRIMMON PKWY STE 250 MORRISVILLE NC 27560 US 27560


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Required No Informationntervention 2017-08-02

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.