QUATTRO 2.5 DQ8450

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a distributor report with the FDA on 2017-10-18 for QUATTRO 2.5 DQ8450 manufactured by Shenzhen Dongdixin Technology Co., Ltd..

Event Text Entries

[89566744] The device history record was examined for the subject device. There were no problems observed during the manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr. The device labeling was reviewed and found to be suitable and adequate for the device to perform its intended use. The most likely reason that caused burns is that user didn't follow the instructions to clean the skin surface over which electrodes are placed.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[89566745] The distributor states that their patient was burned during use of the tens unit. According to the (b)(4) customer service representative, this call was very confusing - there was little information to provide, and the person the representative had spoken to's story changed a couple of times; he seemed unsure of himself. The representative did not believe that the person (he) knew the answers to the questions the rep was asking, and felt he was guessing in response to some questions asked. The person the representative had spoken to while obtaining some answers to some questions states he was a physical therapist - however, he was not the pt in the room when the patient was burned - he stated that this therapist is no longer with the clinic. The representative asked what waveform had been used on the end-user, but the person asking the questions is reported as not having understood the word waveform - the representative reviewed all the waveforms, and chose ems - he later stated that they use the waveform that comes up when they power the device on, he thought if-4p. He was unclear of the end-user's age, and guessed (b)(6). The burn happened at the therapist's office while the pt was in the room with the end-user. He stated immediately the end-user felt shocking, and when the electrodes were removed, a burn mark was evident. He states the electrodes were placed 1" to 6" apart on the user's lower back. They were using 2x2 electrodes. The end-user did seek medical treatment, but the pt does not have any records from that treatment.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number3005170249-2017-00008
MDR Report Key6957381
Report SourceDISTRIBUTOR
Date Received2017-10-18
Date of Report2016-10-19
Date of Event2016-09-14
Date Mfgr Received2016-10-19
Device Manufacturer Date2016-01-11
Date Added to Maude2017-10-18
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional0
Initial Report to FDA0
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMR KANG JIANPING
Manufacturer StreetBLOCK A, 5TH FLOOR, FUHUA TECH NO. 9116 BEIHUAN ROAD
Manufacturer CitySHENZHEN, GUANGDONG 518108
Manufacturer CountryCH
Manufacturer Postal518108
Manufacturer G1SHENZHEN DONGDIXIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Manufacturer StreetNO.3 BUILDING XILIBAIMANG XUSH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,518108
Manufacturer CitySHENZHEN, GUANGDONG 518108
Manufacturer CountryCH
Manufacturer Postal Code518108
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameQUATTRO 2.5
Generic NameTENS UNIT
Product CodeGZJ
Date Received2017-10-18
Model NumberDQ8450
OperatorPHYSICAL THERAPIST
Device AvailabilityN
Device Eval'ed by MfgrR
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerSHENZHEN DONGDIXIN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Manufacturer AddressNO.3 BUILDING XILIBAIMANG XUSH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,518108 SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG 518108 CH 518108


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2017-10-18

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.