C8405, XXL ALEXIS O WND PRO/RET 5/BX 101356501

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a company representative,foreig report with the FDA on 2017-11-16 for C8405, XXL ALEXIS O WND PRO/RET 5/BX 101356501 manufactured by Applied Medical.

Event Text Entries

[93296350] No product is being returned for evaluation and no lot number has been provided to manufacturer. A final report will be sent once the results have been analyzed.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[93296351] Procedure performed - laparotomie = laparotomy. Event description - bij het plaatsen van de alexis xxl werd geconstateerd dat de alexis xxl niet geheel de wondranden bedekt. De functie van wondbescherming gaat dan verloren. De buikwand met vet drkt zich buiten de alexis xxl. Translation ra-qa: when placing the alexis xxl it was discovered that the alexis xxl does not completely cover the wound edges. The functionality of the wound protection then becomes lost/ineffective. The abdominal wall with fat then pushes itself outside the alexis xxl. Additional information was received via email on november 3, 2017 from sr clinical development mgr: "information from applied medical team member october 25, 2017: last week i attended an open gyn case where the alexis o xxl was used. They performed an hysterectomy and as a sampling removed ten glands from all different regions. The midline incision ran from the pubic symphysis around the umbilicus and 2- cm upwards, according to the surgeon an approximately 25 cm incision. The patient was (b)(6) female with a (b)(6). Her larger posture was quite centered around her belly area. Complication: the alexis xxl was unable to cover the wound margins completely. The wound margin popped out on two sides. We advised to loosen the ring by flipping it back two times, this improved the situation but the wound margins were still exposed at the two sides (just a bit less). However, flipping the alexis o back, also resulted in losing a bit of the retraction. In the end, the surgeon wasn't completely satisfied with the exposure and switched to munster retractor. She preferred the [competitor] retractor over the alexis o, however, she appreciated that alexis o was so quick to set up. Information from applied medical team member october 26, 2017: the exposed wound margins (on two sides) with the alexis xxl looked similar to the drawing below" patient status - no patient injury or illness occurred associated with the complaint event type of intervention - n/a.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number2027111-2017-02114
MDR Report Key7038231
Report SourceCOMPANY REPRESENTATIVE,FOREIG
Date Received2017-11-16
Date of Report2017-12-06
Date of Event2017-10-18
Date Facility Aware2017-10-18
Date Mfgr Received2017-10-18
Date Added to Maude2017-11-16
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactWENDY KOBAYASHI
Manufacturer Street22872 AVENIDA EMPRESA
Manufacturer CityRANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal92688
Manufacturer Phone9497138233
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Removal Correction NumberNA
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameC8405, XXL ALEXIS O WND PRO/RET 5/BX
Generic NameKGW
Product CodeKGW
Date Received2017-11-16
Model NumberC8405
Catalog Number101356501
Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Device AvailabilityN
Device AgeDA
Device Eval'ed by MfgrR
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerAPPLIED MEDICAL
Manufacturer Address22872 AVENIDA EMPRESA RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA CA 92688 US 92688


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
10 2017-11-16

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.