RAYSTATION 5

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed with the FDA on 2018-01-19 for RAYSTATION 5 manufactured by Raysearch Laboratories Ab (publ).

Event Text Entries

[98169309] Report on use error leading to incorrect radiotherapy treatment volume for one a patient. The user did not understand the consequences of the center beam in field functionality when beams share an isocenter and the target area defined by the physician was unintentionally modified. Although the modified apertures were clearly displayed for review and approval, it was not noticed that they were not irradiating the intended target. Intended treatment was 8gy x 1fx to vertebrae c6-th2 using two opposed fields. The intended target area was defined by resident and oncologist by defining a treatment beam a with aperture using the vsim workspace. The rtt then created an opposed field b. There was no delineated volume defining the intended target, only the aperture. It was noticed that the isocenter was outside the field opening. Therefore, the "center beam in field" functionality was used on beam a to move the isocenter to the center of the field while keeping the aperture at the intended target area. The resident reviewed field a and verified that the field opening was still as intended. Since field b used the same isocenter as a, the isocenter for b was also automatically moved. The standard behavior when moving an isocenter was automatically used for this beam, i. E. The field opening moved with the isocenter, to outside the intended target area. It was noticed that the isocenter was still outside the b field opening. Therefore, center beam in field was used on beam b without the user realizing that field b had moved away from the intended target area. The isocenter was then moved to the center of the incorrect field opening. Since beam a was not selected for "center beam in field", the field opening was moved with the isocenter, resulting in the same incorrect irradiated area as for beam b. The incorrect field openings were not noticed before or at delivery. As a result, the patient was irradiated on th 1-4 (instead of c6-th2). At staff meeting for case review, the resident reported that the irradiated area was not what had been originally defined in vsim. Patient was treated again a week later with 8gy x 1fx, completion field for c6-th1.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number3007774465-2018-00001
MDR Report Key7204944
Date Received2018-01-19
Date of Report2018-01-18
Date of Event2017-11-15
Date Mfgr Received2017-12-19
Device Manufacturer Date2016-04-20
Date Added to Maude2018-01-19
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional0
Initial Report to FDA0
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMR DAVID HEDFORS
Manufacturer StreetSVEAV[?]GEN 44
Manufacturer CitySTOCKHOLM, 11134
Manufacturer CountrySW
Manufacturer Postal11134
Manufacturer G1RAYSEARCH LABORATORIES AB (PUBL)
Manufacturer StreetSVEAV[?]GEN 44
Manufacturer CitySTOCKHOLM, 11134
Manufacturer CountrySW
Manufacturer Postal Code11134
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report0

Device Details

Brand NameRAYSTATION
Generic NameRADIATION THERAPY TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM
Product CodeMUJ
Date Received2018-01-19
Model Number5
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityY
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerRAYSEARCH LABORATORIES AB (PUBL)
Manufacturer AddressSVEAV[?]GEN 44 STOCKHOLM, 11134 SW 11134


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2018-01-19

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.