MAUDE MDR 7269835

MDR report key
7269835
Report number
1818910-2018-53416
Event key
0
Event type
3
Date of event
2018-01-23
Date received
2018-02-14
Adverse event
3
Product problem
3
Patients in event
0
Reporter occupation
0
Health professional
0
Initial report to FDA
0
Event location
3

Manufacturer Contact#

Contact
MR. CHAD GIBSON
Address
700 ORTHOPAEDIC DRIVE WARSAW IN 46582 US
Phone
574-574-5743
Report source
M
Manufacturer link flag
Y

Devices#

Seq, Brand, Generic table
SeqBrandGenericManufacturerProduct codeModelCatalogLotPMA510(k)ImplantEvaluatedAvailability
1BIOSTOP G CEM RESTR 14MMDEPUY CMW RESORBABLE BIOMATERIALS : CEMENT CENTRALIZER/PLUGDEPUY ORTHOPAEDIC INC, 1818910JDK54631400016F1306005Y R

Patients#

Sequence, Received, Treatment table
SequenceReceivedTreatmentOutcome
12018-02-140

Event Narratives#

N

Patient 1

(B)(4). IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.

D

Patient 1

OCCURRENCE: CEMENT RESTRICTOR BREAKING AT THE TIME OF USE. DETAILS: ON (B)(6) 2018, IN THE TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY SURGERY, USING THE 14 MM BIO CEMENT RESTRICTOR, IT WAS BROKEN. ACCORDING TO REPORTS THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THIS HAPPENS. FOR THIS NEW EVENT, HE CALLED ATTENTION TO RECORD WHAT HAPPENED. IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT THE INSTRUMENTS USED TODAY IN THE C-STEM AMT STEM BOX, "IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE PLUG (CEMENT RESTRICTOR)". WE REQUEST CLARIFICATION AS TO THE INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNIQUES OF USE SO THAT THE PROBLEM DOES NOT HAPPEN AGAIN. PRODUCT AVAILABLE FOR ANALYSIS. PRODUCT INFORMATION: (B)(4) AND LOT: 16F1306005.

N

Patient 1

.

N

Patient 1

PRODUCT COMPLAINT # PC-(B)(4). INVESTIGATION SUMMARYEXAMINATION OF THE RETURNED DEVICE CONFIRMED THE REPORTED BREAKAGE. BASED ON THE PROVIDED INFORMATION AND THE PREFORMED INVESTIGATION, A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. DEPUY CONSIDERS THE INVESTIGATION CLOSED. SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE RECEIVED, THE INFORMATION WILL BE REVIEWED AND THE INVESTIGATION WILL BE RE-OPENED AS NECESSARY. IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE.