N
Patient 1
THE USED NEEDLE WAS DISCARDED. A BOX OF NEEDLES FROM THE SAME LOT WAS RETURNED FOR INVESTIGATION PURPOSES, AND A PHOTO AND A X-RAY IMAGE OF THE FAULT WERE RECEIVED. VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE RECEIVED IMAGES COULD VERIFY THE REPORTED FAILURE, AS THE NEEDLE WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN, AND THE NEEDLE TIP WAS SHOWN ON THE X-RAY, INSIDE THE PATIENT. BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION IT IS HIGHLY SUSPECTED THAT THE CAUSE OF THE NEEDLE BREAK ARE DUE TO EXCESSIVE FORCE DURING INSERTION IN COMBINATION WITH MULTIPLE WIDE ANGLE BENDING. IS IT SUSPECTED THAT THE HANDLING OF THE NEEDLE UNDER SUCH CONDITIONS HAS WEAKENED THE NEEDLE STRENGTH, LEADING TO THE FAILURE. INVESTIGATIONS WERE CARRIED OUT, TO SIMULATE THE ROUGH BENDING OF THE NEEDLE. THE TESTED NEEDLES BEHAVED WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS. DURING NORMAL USAGE, THERE IS NO DANGER THAT THE NEEDLE WILL BREAK BECAUSE THEY ARE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND MANY TIMES OF BENDING WITHIN THE FLEXIBLE LIMIT. THE REPORTED PROBLEM IS INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCT RISK ANALYSIS. THE RISK FOR A HAZARDOUS SITUATION TO OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE REPORTED PROBLEM IS CONCLUDED TO BE ACCEPTABLE LOW. THE CURRENT REPORT DOES NOT RESULT IN A CHANGE OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT. THE OBSERVED COMPLAINT RATING IS WITHIN THE PROBABILITY LEVEL IDENTIFIED IN THE PRODUCT RISK.