CEMENT REMOVAL HANDSET OH300/2

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a distributor,foreign report with the FDA on 2018-11-08 for CEMENT REMOVAL HANDSET OH300/2 manufactured by Orthofix Srl.

Event Text Entries

[126510904] On july 2017 orthofix (b)(4) acquired from orthosonics ltd, the oscar system, for ultrasonic arthroplasty revision. Therefore, orthofix (b)(4) is now managing post-market surveillance for oscar devices, also for the ones manufactured and released to the market by orthosonics ltd. The devices involved in this event were manufactured by orthosonics ltd. Technical evaluation: the returned devices, received on september 13th, 2018, were examined by orthofix (b)(4) quality engineering department. All devices were subjected to visual and functional check as per orthofix (b)(4) specification. The visual check evidenced as follows: the ultrasonic generator, device code os3000 serial number (b)(4), did not show any anomalies. For all the three cement removal handsets, devices code oh300/2, the shroud is missing. Moreover, one cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0082, is missing also the rear end cap o-ring. The functional check evidenced as follows: the ultrasonic generator, device code os3000 serial number (b)(4) is functioning properly. The cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0078, is not functioning properly. The sealing is lost from the front flange, therefore the handset does not work. The generator shows the alert message: "poor feedback, release all switches". The cement removal handset, device code oh300/02 batch 3h0080, is not functioning properly. The ceramics inside are broken. The handset does not work. The generator shows alert message: "poor feedback". The cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0082, is not functioning properly. The sealing is lost from the rear body seal, therefore the handset does not work. The handset is not detected by the generator. The results of the technical evaluation concluded as follows: the ultrasonic generator, device code os3000 serial number (b)(4) is functioning properly (mfr report 9680825-2018-00084). The failure found on the cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0078, is most likely attributable to water that entered inside the handset during cleaning and sterilization cycles. This may happen as a result of normal wear and tear of silicone o-rings (mfr report 9680825-2018-00094). 3). The failure found on the cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0080, is most likely attributable to a normal wear and tear of the internal ceramics (this report). 4). The failure found on the cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0082, is most likely attributable to water that entered inside the handset during cleaning and sterilization cycles. This may happen as a result of the absence of silicone o-rings and is attributable to an incorrect handling of the device (mfr report 9680825-2018-00096). Medical evaluation: the information made available on the case together with the results of the technical investigation were sent to our medical evaluator. Please find below an extract of the medical evaluations performed. "in this case a male patient had an accident that resulted in the fracture of a hip implant (not specified). The implant was in the femur and must have been cemented in place, because the oscar system was required to remove the cement to allow for a replacement implant. There appears to have been an electrical problem with the oscar system which failed to function. As a result the surgeon had no option but to continue with the operation with hand tools. In order to remove the cement it was necessary to do an osteotomy in the femur for access. Because of the nature of the osteotomy it was necessary for the patient to be non weightbearing for 6 weeks, as he is elderly and quite heavy. In practice it was necessary for the patient to remain in hospital for 6 weeks as he could not be cared for elsewhere". Final comments: on july 2017 orthofix (b)(4) acquired from orthosonics ltd, the oscar system, for ultrasonic arthroplasty revision. Therefore, orthofix (b)(4) is now managing post-market surveillance for oscar devices, also for the ones manufactured and released to the market by orthosonics ltd. The devices involved in this event were manufactured by orthosonics ltd. The results of the technical evaluation concluded as follows: the ultrasonic generator, device code os3000 serial number (b)(4) is functioning properly (mfr report 9680825-2018-00084). The failure found on the cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0078, is most likely attributable to water that entered inside the handset during cleaning and sterilization cycles. This may happen as a result of normal wear and tear of silicone o-rings (mfr report 9680825-2018-00094). The failure found on the cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0080, is most likely attributable to a normal wear and tear of the internal ceramics (this report). 4). The failure found on the cement removal handset, device code oh300/2 batch 3h0082, is most likely attributable to water that entered inside the handset during cleaning and sterilization cycles. This may happen as a result of the absence of silicone o-rings and is attributable to an incorrect handling of the device (mfr report 9680825-2018-00096). The medical evaluation evidenced as follows: "in this case a male patient had an accident that resulted in the fracture of a hip implant (not specified). The implant was in the femur and must have been cemented in place, because the oscar system was required to remove the cement to allow for a replacement implant. There appears to have been an electrical problem with the oscar system which failed to function. As a result the surgeon had no option but to continue with the operation with hand tools. In order to remove the cement it was necessary to do an osteotomy in the femur for access. Because of the nature of the osteotomy it was necessary for the patient to be non weightbearing for 6 weeks, as he is elderly and quite heavy. In practice it was necessary for the patient to remain in hospital for 6 weeks as he could not be cared for elsewhere". Based on the results of the technical evaluation, which confirmed the ultrasonic generator conformity, an on the evidences deriving from the medical evaluation, orthofix (b)(4) can conclude that the problem that occurred is due to normal wear and tear of the handsets. Orthofix (b)(4) continues monitoring the devices on the market.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[126510905] The information provided by the local distributor indicates: hospital name: (b)(6). Surgeon name: mr (b)(6). Date of surgery: (b)(6) 2018. Body part to which device was applied: no response. Surgery description: fracture treatment/other. Patient information: male. Problem observed during: clinical use on patient/intraoperative. Type of problem: device functional problem. Event description: "surgery was for implant fracture. Electrical arcing was seen and heard by the surgeon in the oscar control box. The handpiece was feeling warm and would not work. The malfunction of the oscar until led to an extended operative time for the case with increased bloodloss. An osteotomy was performed to assist with cement clearance which unfortunately extended and requiring wiring". The complaint report form also indicates: the device failure caused adverse effects to patient. The initial surgery was not completed with the device. A replacement device was immediately available to complete the surgery. The event led to a clinically relevant increase in the duration of the surgical procedure. An additional surgery was not required. A medical intervention (outpatient clinic) was not required. Copies of the operative report are not available. Copies of the x-ray images are not available. Patient current health conditions: "the result of this is a 6 week period of non weight bearing which at this patient age and weight is essentially 6 weeks in hospital". On september 25th, 2018, orthofix received the following communication "the patient was a trauma patient and it is not possible to get the patient weight and height. We will try again and see if it is possible to get the copy of the patient x-rays". No other information was provided. Manufacturer reference number: (b)(4). Distributor reference number: (b)(4).
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number9680825-2018-00095
MDR Report Key8050025
Report SourceDISTRIBUTOR,FOREIGN
Date Received2018-11-08
Date of Report2018-11-07
Date of Event2018-08-24
Date Mfgr Received2018-10-17
Date Added to Maude2018-11-08
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMR. ROBERTO DONADELLO
Manufacturer StreetVIA DELLE NAZIONI, 9
Manufacturer CityBUSSOLENGO, VERONA, ITALY 37012
Manufacturer CountryIT
Manufacturer Postal37012
Manufacturer G1ORTHOFIX SRL
Manufacturer StreetVIA DELLE NAZIONI, 9
Manufacturer CityBUSSOLENGO, VERONA, ITALY 37012
Manufacturer CountryIT
Manufacturer Postal Code37012
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameCEMENT REMOVAL HANDSET
Generic NameCEMENT REMOVAL HANDSET
Product CodeJDX
Date Received2018-11-08
Returned To Mfg2018-09-13
Model NumberOH300/2
Catalog NumberOH300/2
Lot Number3H0080
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityR
Device Eval'ed by MfgrY
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerORTHOFIX SRL
Manufacturer AddressVIA DELLE NAZIONI, 9 BUSSOLENGO, VERONA, ITALY 37012 IT 37012


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Required No Informationntervention 2018-11-08

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.