A DEVICE EVALUATION WAS NOT PERFORMED BECAUSE THE OPMI PENTERO 900 MICROSCOPE WAS SERVICED 3 WEEKS PRIOR TO THE INCIDENT AND NO ISSUES WERE IDENTIFIED. IN ADDITION, THE CUSTOMER COMMUNICATED THAT THE ISSUE WAS NOT CAUSED DUE TO ANY MALFUNCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE.
D
Patient 1
A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) REPORTED THAT A PATIENT RECEIVED A 1ST TO 2ND DEGREE BURN DURING A SPINAL SURGERY WHILE USING AN OPMI PENTERO 900 MICROSCOPE. THE BURN WAS EGG-SIZED AND WITHIN THE PROXIMITY OF THE SURGICAL AREA. THE HCP TREATED THE PATIENT'S BURN WITH A GREASE PAD. THE HCP COMMUNICATED THAT THE ISSUE WAS NOT AS A RESULT OF ANY MALFUNCTION WITH THE MICROSCOPE. THE HCP REPORTED THAT THE FOCUS LIGHT LINK WAS PURPOSELY SWITCHED OFF PRIOR TO THE SURGERY WHICH COMPROMISED A SAFETY MEASURE OF THE MICROSCOPE.