MAUDE MDR 824050

MDR report key
824050
Report number
1061857-2007-00022
Event key
0
Event type
3
Date of event
2006-10-06
Date received
2007-02-28
Adverse event
3
Product problem
3
Patients in event
0
Reporter occupation
0
Health professional
3
Initial report to FDA
3
Event location
0

Manufacturer Contact#

Contact
SHERRI LAKOTA
Address
2501 DISCOVERY DR, STE 500 ORLANDO FL 32826 US
Phone
407-407-4073
Report source
M
Manufacturer link flag
Y

Devices#

Seq, Brand, Generic table
SeqBrandGenericManufacturerProduct codeModelCatalogLotPMA510(k)ImplantEvaluatedAvailability
1LADARVISION 4000OPHTHALMIC EXCIMER LASER SYSTEMALCON - ORLANDO TECHNOLOGY CENTERDZSNA8065490084NANYY

Patients#

Sequence, Received, Treatment table
SequenceReceivedTreatmentOutcome
12007-02-2801. O

Event Narratives#

D

Patient 1

A SYSTEM OPERATOR REPORTS ONE CUSTOM PATIENT WITH AN OVERCORRECTION POST-OP. PATIENT RECORDS PROVIDED INDICATE AT APPROXIMATELY 3.5 MONTHS POST-OP, THIS PATIENT WAS OVERCORRECTED BY .75 DIOPTERS IN THE LEFT EYE. DURING THE INVESTIGATION, IT WAS FOUND THAT THIS PATIENT ALSO EXHIBITED A 2-LINE DECREASE IN BCVA IN THE LEFT EYE AND BOTH EYES EXHIBITED A SLIGHT INCREASE IN ASTIGMATISM; -1 DIOPTER IN THE RIGHT EYE AND -.75 DIOPTERS IN THE LEFT EYE.

N

Patient 1

A SYSTEM PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION WAS PERFORMED ON THIS SYSTEM. ANALYSIS INDICATES THE SYSTEM WAS OPERATING WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE RECORDED PARAMETERS DURING THE TIME OF THIS PATIENT'S SURGERY. DETERMINATION OF ROOT CAUSE: ASSESSMENT: THE CONCLUSION OF THE DEVICE INVESTIGATION INDICATES THE SYSTEM PERFORMED WITHIN SPECIFICATIONS DURING THIS PATIENT'S SURGERY. NON-PRODUCT FACTORS INCLUDING PATIENT RESPONSE TO THE LASER ABLATION, PATIENT HEALING CHARACTERISTICS AND PREOPERATIVE PATIENT SELECTION WERE REVIEWED. IN THIS CASE, SPECIFIC NON-PRODUCT FACTORS THAT COULD HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE LOSS OF BCVA FOR THE OS COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. NO COMMENTS OR EXPLANATIONS WERE DOCUMENTED BY THE SITE NOR WERE ADDITIONAL TESTS (SUCH AS PIN-HOLE ACUITY) WERE PERFORMED TO CONFIRM OR DENY THE LOSS OF BCVA. IN REGARDS TO THE INDUCED ASTIGMATISM FOR BOTH EYES, POSTOPERATIVE TOPOGRAPHIES WERE NOT PROVIDED TO DETERMINE THE CAUSE OF THE INDUCED ASTIGMATISM, THEREFORE SPECIFIC NON-PRODUCT FACTORS COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. FOR THE .75D OVERCORRECTION NOTED FOR THE OS, NO SPECIFIC NON-PRODUCT FACTORS COULD BE DETERMINED. CONCLUSION: BASED ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED, AN INDIVIDUAL PATIENT RESPONSE AND HEALING CHARACTERISTICS MAY HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE OUTCOMES.