N
Patient 1
PRODUCT COMPLAINT # (B)(4). IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE. UDI: (B)(4).
| Seq | Brand | Generic | Manufacturer | Product code | Model | Catalog | Lot | PMA | 510(k) | Implant | Evaluated | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MENISCAL DEPLOYMENT GUN | ORTHOPAEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER | DEPUY MITEK LLC US | GEF | 228143 | L502531 | R | N |
| Sequence | Received | Treatment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019-04-02 | 0 |
Patient 1
PRODUCT COMPLAINT # (B)(4). IF INFORMATION IS OBTAINED THAT WAS NOT AVAILABLE FOR THE INITIAL MEDWATCH, A FOLLOW-UP MEDWATCH WILL BE FILED AS APPROPRIATE. UDI: (B)(4).
Patient 1
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE AFFILIATE VIA EMAIL THAT DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE THE FIRST IMPLANT WAS POSITIONED CORRECTLY IN THE APPLICATOR, BUT WHEN THE DOCTOR USED THE CORRECT TECHNIQUE (USING A MALLEABLE HEMICANUKA) AFTER HAVING CROSSED THE MENISCUS, THE IMPLANT WOULD NOT DISCHARGE FROM THE GUN DESPITE HAVING REPEATEDLY PRESSING THE TRIGGER. THE SECOND IMPLANT WAS POSITIONED CORRECTLY IN THE APPLICATOR, BUT WHEN THE DOCTOR USED THE CORRECT TECHNIQUE (USING A MALLEABLE HEMICANUKA) AFTER HAVING CROSSED THE MENISCUS AND FIRED THE FIRST IMPLANT, WHEN POSITIONING THE SECOND IMPLANT A FEW MILLIMETERS, EVERY SYSTEM CAME OUT OF THE APPLICATOR. THE SURGEON DID NOT WANT TO CONTINUE HURTING THE MENISCUS WITH MENISCAL SUTURE AND SO CHOSE TO DO A MENISCECTOMY INSTEAD.