GLUMA 66043451

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a health professional report with the FDA on 2019-04-10 for GLUMA 66043451 manufactured by Kulzer Gmbh.

Event Text Entries

[141586824] User did not follow the manufacturer's instruction which state, "... Can cause local chemical burns... Protect mucus membranes from contact with the product by using a rubber dam... Apply the smallest possible amount of gluma desensitizing powergel required for one treatment. " this was a severe injury, as the patient did not heal within the normal healing time of 2-10 days. Even though it occurred for a short amount of time, this injury affected the patient's daily life as she was on a liquid diet and had to apply multiple topical applications for palliative care. She also sought a second opinion for her injuries. (b)(4) has been in contact with the patient and has confirmed that as of 3/26/2019, the patient has stated that they have completely healed and have no residual symptoms. (b)(4).
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[141586825] On 3/11/19 per patient: patient was seen in the office on (b)(6) and the hygienist applied gluma powergel to upper and lower posterior areas. She has sensitivity so the hygienist said they had a new product to office. The hygienist applied to her posterior teeth on the bottom and left it in for a minute and a half. When the patient was asked if the hygienist used a rubber dam, she stated the only thing the hygienist did was pull her cheek away from her teeth when she applied it. She then closed her mouth and then told the hygienist that her mouth was burning. She stated the tube the clinician used was green (which is our gluma powergel). Once the patient went home she noticed her tissue was sloughing off and it way greyish in color. She had sores on her gums, lips and bottom of the mouth. She went back to the dds on (b)(6) 2019. Dds said it was a new product and is a lot stronger. The patient is not able to eat, she is on a liquid diet. There is no longer any sloughing but the sores are still painful. The dds recommended that she rinse with warm salt water up to 5x a day, apply periosciences 3 x's a day and apply vitamin e 2x's a day. I told the patient i will follow up with the office and reviewed the directions for use with her, re-iterating the fact that we recommend in our directions for use to utilize a rubber dam to isolate the soft tissues as the material is known to be caustic to soft tissues. The patient agreed to let me follow up with her in a week to check on her healing. She stated she has been a patient of the dental office for 20 years, but after this incident, she is seeking treatment with another dds. On 3/14/19 per the dds: dr. Called and discussed the patient's treatment. Dr. Confirmed the patient was seen on (b)(6) 2019, and the hygienist applied gluma powergel. The office has been using regular gluma and just recently began using the powergel. Patient came into the office on friday. She had been taking 400mg of ibuprofen and the dds recommended something stronger but the patient declined. She also recommended no citrus, spicy foods or carbonated beverages. Dr. Stated the patient was using a chlorhexidine rinse at home which the she advised the patient to cease use. She also recommended the patient use perioscience gel, salt water rinses and vitamin e. The patient was using (b)(6) to remove the sloughing tissue and the dds advised her to stop as this could cause more irritation. Dr. Stated that the left vestibule is worse than the right and there is no visible tissue effects on the upper vestibular areas. The dr. Stated that she had spoken with the hygienist who applied the gluma last tuesday and the hygienist stated that the patient came in for a routine cleaning and suffers from recession and hypersensitivity. Hygienist applied mi paste prior to cleaning. At the end of the cleaning, the hygienist gave the option for desensitizing treatment. The hygienist told the dr. The material was applied using a mirror and finger for retraction. The patient claimed that she felt a burning sensation and the material was rinsed. After treatment, the patient had an itero scan and there was nothing clinically notable on the scan. Thursday (more than 48 hours after) the patient contacted the offices stating she had sores and tissue was still burning.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number9610902-2019-00004
MDR Report Key8501126
Report SourceHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Date Received2019-04-10
Date of Report2019-03-27
Date of Event2019-03-05
Date Facility Aware2019-03-08
Date Mfgr Received2019-03-08
Date Added to Maude2019-04-10
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Reporter OccupationDENTIST
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMRS AMBER BROWN
Manufacturer Street4315 S. LAFAYETTE BLVD
Manufacturer CitySOUTH BEND IN 46614
Manufacturer CountryUS
Manufacturer Postal46614
Manufacturer Phone5472995411
Manufacturer G1KULZER GMBH
Manufacturer StreetPHILIPP-REIS-STRABE 8/13
Manufacturer CityWEHRHEIM, D-61273
Manufacturer CountryGM
Manufacturer Postal CodeD-61273
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameGLUMA
Generic NameDESENSITIZER
Product CodeKLE
Date Received2019-04-10
Catalog Number66043451
Lot NumberUNKNOWN
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityN
Device Eval'ed by MfgrR
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerKULZER GMBH
Manufacturer AddressPHILIPP-REIS-STRABE 8/13 WEHRHEIM, D-61273 GM D-61273


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2019-04-10

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.