VOCO PROFLUORID VARNISH REF 2231

MAUDE Adverse Event Report

MAUDE data represents reports of adverse events involving medical devices. This maude entry was filed from a health professional report with the FDA on 2020-01-15 for VOCO PROFLUORID VARNISH REF 2231 manufactured by Voco Gmbh.

Event Text Entries

[179421357] On the basis of the information available,we share the dentist opinion that the patient's symptoms were probably not caused by treatment with profluorid varnish. Vpv contains colophony. Allergic reactions cannot be excluded in individual cases. However, because the patient needed medical intervention and it cannot be excluded that vpv contributed to the incident, we precautionary report the incident to the fda in accordance with 21 cfr 803. Further action are not required.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: N, H10


[179421358] Mother of (b)(6)yo female patient, with no known allergies/ no current medical conditions called the dentists office on 10-jan-2020 reporting "an anaphylactic reaction to the varnish" from the cleaning appointment her child had on thursday ((b)(6) 2020). She said the child complained of a sore/ burning throat on the way home. The patient had a typical exam, prophylaxis and vpv was placed. The patient had been treated once prior to this appointment in the office (prophylaxis) without issue. A photo we received on friday (10-jan-2020) afternoon shows swollen lesions in the tonsil/ throat area. No photo was taken of the gingiva, lips, tongue or buccal mucosa. The patient never complained of pain while in the office or as the vpv was placed. There was no fever and no issues breathing. The hygienist/ doctor was unaware of any issue until the following day (friday 10-jan-2020). The mother then reported to the office that the child saw an oral surgeon, who was a neighbor, and he suggest it was a reaction to the vpv. The mother then took the patient to the paediatrician who diagnosed the patient with allergies. The patient was prescribed steroids by the paediatrician. On 14-01-2020 there was a report to the practice staff the brother now presents with the same lesions. The dentist feels this is a viral/ bacterial infection and not associated with the varnish treatment.
Patient Sequence No: 1, Text Type: D, B5


MAUDE Entry Details

Report Number8010908-2020-00001
MDR Report Key9591559
Report SourceHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Date Received2020-01-15
Date of Report2020-01-15
Date of Event2020-01-09
Date Added to Maude2020-01-15
Event Key0
Report Source CodeManufacturer report
Manufacturer LinkY
Number of Patients in Event0
Adverse Event Flag3
Product Problem Flag3
Reprocessed and Reused Flag3
Reporter OccupationDENTIST
Health Professional3
Initial Report to FDA3
Report to FDA3
Event Location3
Manufacturer ContactMR MICHAEL CYLL
Manufacturer StreetANTON-FLETTNER-STRASSE 1-3
Manufacturer CityCUXHAVEN, NIEDERSACHSEN 27472
Manufacturer CountryGM
Manufacturer Postal27472
Single Use3
Previous Use Code3
Event Type3
Type of Report3

Device Details

Brand NameVOCO PROFLUORID VARNISH
Generic NamePROFLUORID VARNISH
Product CodeLBH
Date Received2020-01-15
Catalog NumberREF 2231
Lot Number1814071
OperatorHEALTH PROFESSIONAL
Device AvailabilityN
Device Eval'ed by MfgrR
Device Sequence No1
Device Event Key0
ManufacturerVOCO GMBH
Manufacturer AddressANTON-FLETTNER-STRASSE 1-3 CUXHAVEN, 27472 GM 27472


Patients

Patient NumberTreatmentOutcomeDate
101. Other 2020-01-15

© 2024 FDA.report
This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the FDA.