N
Patient 1
AS THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED IN A CONDITION WAS CONTRADICTORY TO THE COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION. THE MARKSMAN CATHETER FOUND SEPARATED. THIS CONDITION WAS NOT REPORTED AT TIME OF THE EVENT. AS RECEIVED, THE MEDTRONIC FLOW DIVERSION WAS RETURNED WITHIN THE MARKSMAN CATHETER. THE FLOW DIVERSION PUSHWIRE WAS FOUND PROTRUDING FROM WITHIN THE MARKSMAN HUB. NO DAMAGES WERE FOUND WITH THE MARKSMAN HUB. THE MARKSMAN CATHETER BODY WAS FOUND ACCORDIONED AND SEPARATED FROM THE PROXIMAL END OF THE HUB. IN ADDITION, THE MARKSMAN CATHETER BODY WAS FOUND ACCORDIONED FROM THE DISTAL TIP. DURING EVALUATION, THE MARKSMAN CATHETER WAS DISSECTED (CUT) TO REMOVE THE STUCK FLOW DIVERSION EMBOLIZATION DEVICE. BASED ON THE RETURNED DEVICE DEVICE ANALYSIS AND REPORTED INFORMATION, IT APPEARS THAT THERE WAS HIGH FORCE USED. IT IS LIKELY THIS DAMAGE OCCURRED WHEN THE CUSTOMER ATTEMPTED TO ADVANCE FLOW DIVERSION THROUGH THE MARKSMAN CATHETER AGAINST RESISTANCE SUBSEQUENTLY CAUSING THE CATHETER TO BECOME SEPARATED. BASED ON THE INVESTIGATION CONDUCTED RESISTANCE CAN OCCUR DURING TRACKING, DEPLOYMENT AND RE-SHEATHING OF THE DEVICE IN DISTAL AND TORTUOUS ANATOMIES. IN ADDITION, RESISTANCE CAN OCCUR DUE TO PATIENT VESSEL TORTUOSITY, FAILURE TO MAINTAIN A CONTINUOUS FLUSH, OR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE IS PULLED BACK/TORQUED DURING DELIVERY. THE VESSEL ANATOMY WAS NORMAL IN TORTUOSITY AND A CONTINUOUS FLUSH WAS MAINTAINED. THEREFORE, THE CAUSE COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. IF INFORMATION IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE ISSUED.