Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice.
Single-Agent Use:
The data described below reflect exposure to gemcitabine for injection as a single agent administered at doses between 800 mg/m2 to 1250 mg/m2 over 30 minutes intravenously, once weekly, in 979 patients with a variety of malignancies. The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions of single-agent gemcitabine for injection are nausea/vomiting, anemia, increased ALT, increased AST, neutropenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, proteinuria, fever, hematuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, dyspnea, and edema. The most common (≥5%) Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were neutropenia, nausea/vomiting; increased ALT, increase alkaline phosphatase, anemia, increased AST, and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 10% of the 979 patients discontinued gemcitabine for injection due to adverse reactions. Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine for injection in 2% of 979 patients were cardiovascular adverse events (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, and hypertension) and adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine for injection in less than 1% of the 979 patients were anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, rash, dyspnea, hemorrhage, infection, stomatitis, somnolence, flu-like syndrome, and edema.
Table 5 presents the incidence of adverse reactions reported in 979 patients with various malignancies receiving single-agent gemcitabine for injection across 5 clinical trials. Table 5 includes all clinical adverse reactions, reported in at least 10% of patients. A listing of clinically significant adverse reactions is provided following the table.
Table 5: Selected Per-Patient Incidence of Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Single-Agent Gemcitabine For Injectiona
| | All Patients b
|
| | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryc | | | |
| Hematologic | | | |
| Anemia | 68 | 7 | 1 |
| Neutropenia | 63 | 19 | 6 |
| Thrombocytopenia | 24 | 4 | 1 |
| Hepatic | | | |
| Increased ALT | 68 | 8 | 2 |
| Increased AST | 67 | 6 | 2 |
| Increased Alkaline Phosphatase | 55 | 7 | 2 |
| Hyperbilirubinemia | 13 | 2 | <1 |
| Renal | | | |
| Proteinuria | 45 | <1 | 0 |
| Hematuria | 35 | <1 | 0 |
| Increased BUN | 16 | 0 | 0 |
| Increased Creatinine | 8 | <1 | 0 |
| Non– laboratoryd
| | | |
| Nausea and Vomiting | 69 | 13 | 1 |
| Fever | 41 | 2 | 0 |
| Rash | 30 | <1 | 0 |
| Dyspnea | 23 | 3 | <1 |
| Diarrhea | 19 | 1 | 0 |
| Hemorrhage | 17 | <1 | <1 |
| Infection | 16 | 1 | <1 |
| Alopecia | 15 | <1 | 0 |
| Stomatitis | 11 | <1 | 0 |
| Somnolence | 11 | <1 | <1 |
| Paresthesias | 10 | <1 | 0 |
a Grade based on criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO).
b N=699-974; all patients with laboratory or non-laboratory data.
c Regardless of causality.
d For approximately 60% of patients, non-laboratory adverse events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related.
- Transfusion requirements — Red blood cell transfusions (19%); platelet transfusions (<1%)
- Fever — Fever occurred in the absence of clinical infection and frequently in combination with other flu-like symptoms.
- Pulmonary — Dyspnea unrelated to underlying disease and sometimes accompanied by bronchospasm.
- Edema — Edema (13%), peripheral edema (20%), and generalized edema (<1%); <1% of patients. discontinued gemcitabine for injection due to edema.
- Flu-like Symptoms — Characterized by fever, asthenia, anorexia, headache, cough, chills, myalgia, asthenia insomnia, rhinitis, sweating, and/or malaise (19%); <1% of patients discontinued gemcitabine for injection due to flu-like symptoms
- Infection — Sepsis (<1%)
- Extravasation — Injection-site reactions (4%)
- Allergic — Bronchospasm (<2%); anaphylactoid reactions [see Contraindications
(4)].
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer:
Table 6 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial of gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin (n=262) administered in 28-day cycles as compared to cisplatin alone (n=260) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [see Clinical Studies (14.3)
].
Patients randomized to gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin received a median of 4 cycles of treatment and those randomized to cisplatin received a median of 2 cycles of treatment. In this trial, the requirement for dose adjustments (>90% versus 16%), discontinuation of treatment for adverse reactions (15% versus 8%), and the proportion of patients hospitalized (36% versus 23%) were all higher for patients receiving gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin arm compared to those receiving cisplatin alone. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (9/262 versus 2/260), sepsis (4% versus 1%), Grade 3 cardiac dysrhythmias (3% versus <1%) were all higher in the gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin arm compared to the cisplatin alone arm. The two-drug combination was more myelosuppressive with 4 (1.5%) possibly treatment-related deaths, including 3 resulting from myelosuppression with infection and one case of renal failure associated with pancytopenia and infection. No deaths due to treatment were reported on the cisplatin arm.
Table 6: Per-Patient Incidence of Selected Adverse Reactions from Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine For Injection plus Cisplatin versus Single-Agent Cisplatin in Patients with NSCLC Occurring at Higher Incidence in Gemcitabine For Injection-Treated Patients [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3 - 4)]a
|
| Gemcitabine For Injection plus Cisplatin b
| | | Cisplatin c
| | |
| All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryd
| | | | | | |
| Hematologic | | | | | | |
| Anemia | 89 | 22 | 3 | 67 | 6 | 1 |
| RBC Transfusion e
| 39 | | | 13 | | |
| Neutropenia | 79 | 22 | 35 | 20 | 3 | 1 |
| Thrombocytopenia | 85 | 25 | 25 | 13 | 3 | 1 |
| Platelet Transfusion e
| 21 | | | <1 | | |
| Lymphopenia | 75 | 25 | 18 | 51 | 12 | 5 |
| Hepatic | | | | | | |
| Increased Transaminases | 22 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| Increased Alkaline Phosphatase | 19 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Renal | | | | | | |
| Proteinuria | 23 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Hematuria | 15 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Elevated creatinine | 38 | 4 | <1 | 31 | 2 | <1 |
| Other Laboratory | | | | | | |
| Hyperglycemia | 30 | 4 | 0 | 23 | 3 | 0 |
| Hypomagnesemia | 30 | 4 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 0 |
| Hypocalcemia | 18 | 2 | 0 | 7 | 0 | <1 |
| Non-laboratoryf | | | | | | |
| Nausea | 93 | 25 | 2 | 87 | 20 | <1 |
| Vomiting | 78 | 11 | 12 | 71 | 10 | 9 |
| Alopecia | 53 | 1 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 0 |
| Neuro Motor | 35 | 12 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 0 |
| Diarrhea | 24 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Neuro Sensory | 23 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 1 | 0 |
| Infection | 18 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
| Fever | 16 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Neuro Cortical | 16 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| Neuro Mood | 16 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 0 |
| Local | 15 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Neuro Headache | 14 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Stomatitis | 14 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Hemorrhage | 14 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Hypotension | 12 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 |
| Rash | 11 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
a National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) for severity grading.
b N=217–253; all gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin patients with laboratory or non–laboratory data gemcitabine for injection at 1000 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 and cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 28 days.
c N=213–248; all cisplatin patients with laboratory or non–laboratory data. Cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 28 days.
d Regardless of causality.
e Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Percent transfusions are not CTC–graded events.
f Non–laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug–related.
Table 7 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial of gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin (n=69) administered in 21-day cycles as compared to etoposide plus cisplatin alone (n=66) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. A listing of clinically significant adverse reactions is provided following the table.
Patients in the gemcitabine for injection cisplatin (GC) arm received a median of 5 cycles and those in the etoposide/cisplatin (EC) arm received a median of 4 cycles. The majority of patients receiving more than one cycle of treatment required dose adjustments; 81% in the (GC) arm and 68% in the (EC) arm. The incidence of hospitalizations for treatment-related adverse events was 22% (GC) and 27% in the (EC) arm. The proportion of discontinuation of treatment for treatment-related adverse reactions was higher for patients in the (GC) arm (14% versus 8%). The proportion of patients hospitalized for febrile neutropenia was lower in the (GC) arm (7% versus 12%). There was one death attributed to treatment, a patient with febrile neutropenia and renal failure, which occurred in the gemcitabine for injection /cisplatin arm.
Table 7: Per-Patient Incidence of Selected Adverse Reactions in Randomized Trial of Gemcitabine For Injection plus Cisplatin versus Etoposide plus Cisplatin in Patients with NSCLCa
| Gemcitabine For Injection plus Cisplatinb
| | | Etoposide plus Cisplatinc
| | |
| | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryd
| | | | | | |
| Hematologic | | | | | | |
| Anemia | 88 | 22 | 0 | 77 | 13 | 2 |
| RBC Transfusionse | 29 | - | - | 21 | - | - |
| Neutropenia | 88 | 36 | 28 | 87 | 20 | 56 |
| Thrombocytopenia | 81 | 39 | 16 | 45 | 8 | 5 |
| Platelet Transfusionse
| 3 | - | - | 8 | - | - |
| Hepatic | | | | | | |
| Increased ALT | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| Increased AST | 3 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Increased Alkaline | 16 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Phosphatase | | | | | | |
| Bilirubin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Renal | | | | | | |
| Proteinuria | 12 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Hematuria | 22 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| BUN | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Creatinine | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Non– laboratoryf,g | | | | | | |
| Nausea and Vomiting | 96 | 35 | 4 | 86 | 19 | 7 |
| Fever | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Rash | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dyspnea | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Diarrhea | 14 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 2 |
| Hemorrhage | 9 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Infection | 28 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 8 | 0 |
| Alopecia | 77 | 13 | 0 | 92 | 51 | 0 |
| Stomatitis | 20 | 4 | 0 | 18 | 2 | 0 |
| Somnolence | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Paresthesias | 38 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 2 | 0 |
a Grade based on criteria from the World Health Organization (WHO).
b N=67–69; all gemcitabine for injection plus cisplatin patients with laboratory or non–laboratory data. Gemcitabine for injection at 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 and cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 every 21 days.
c N=57–63; all cisplatin plus etoposide patients with laboratory or non–laboratory data. Cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 on Day 1 and intravenous etoposide at 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 2, and 3 every 21 days.
dRegardless of causality.
e WHO grading scale not applicable to proportion of patients with transfusions
fNon–laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug–related.
g Pain data were not collected.
Flu-like syndrome: 3% in the gemcitabine for injection/cisplatin arm versus none in the etoposide/cisplatin arm.
Edema: 12% in the gemcitabine for injection/cisplatin arm versus 2% in the etoposide/cisplaarm.tin
Breast CancerTable 8 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection plus paclitaxel arm, reported in a randomized trial of gemcitabine for injection plus paclitaxel (n=262) compared to paclitaxel alone (n=259) for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in women who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in the adjuvant/neo-adjuvant setting or for whom anthracyclines were contraindicated. [see Clinical Studies (14.2)].
The requirement for dose reduction of paclitaxel were higher for patients in the gemcitabine for injection/paclitaxel arm (5% versus 2%). The number of paclitaxel doses omitted (<1%), the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment for treatment-related adverse reactions (7% versus 5%), and the number of treatment-related deaths (1 patient in each arm) were similar between the two arms.
Table 8: Per-Patient Incidence of Selected Adverse Reactions from Comparative Trial of Gemcitabine For Injection plus Paclitaxel versus Single-Agent Paclitaxel in Breast Cancera Occurring at Higher Incidence in Gemcitabine For Injection-Treated Patients [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3 - 4)]
| Gemcitabine For Injection plus Paclitaxel (N=262) | | | Paclitaxel(N=259) | | |
| | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryb | | | | | | |
| Hematologic | | | | | | |
| Anemia | 69 | 6 | 1 | 51 | 3 | <1 |
| Neutropenia | 69 | 31 | 17 | 31 | 4 | 7 |
| Thrombocytopenia | 26 | 5 | <1 | 7 | <1 | <1 |
| Hepatobiliary | | | | | | |
| Increased ALT | 18 | 5 | <1 | 6 | <1 | 0 |
| Increased AST | 16 | 2 | 0 | 5 | <1 | 0 |
| Non– laboratoryc
| | | | | | |
| Alopecia | 90 | 14 | 4 | 92 | 19 | 3 |
| Neuropathy– sensory | 64 | 5 | <1 | 58 | 3 | 0 |
| Nausea | 50 | 1 | 0 | 31 | 2 | 0 |
| Fatigue | 40 | 6 | <1 | 28 | 1 | <1 |
| Vomiting | 29 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 2 | 0 |
| Diarrhea | 20 | 3 | 0 | 13 | 2 | 0 |
| Anorexia | 17 | 0 | 0 | 12 | <1 | 0 |
| Neuropathy– motor | 15 | 2 | <1 | 10 | <1 | 0 |
| Stomatitis/ pharyngitis | 13 | 1 | <1 | 8 | <1 | 0 |
| Fever | 13 | <1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Rash/ desquamation | 11 | <1 | <1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
a Severity grade based on National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0
b Regardless of causality.
c Non–laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug–relate
The following clinically relevant, Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions occurred with a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection plus paclitaxel arm compared with paclitaxel arm: febrile neutropenia (5% versus 1.2%) and dyspnea (1.9%versus 0)
Ovarian Cancer
Table 9 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine for injection plus carboplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial of gemcitabine for injection plus carboplatin (n=175) compared to carboplatin alone (n=174) for the second-line treatment of ovarian cancer in women with disease that had relapsed more than 6 months following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. [see Clinical Studies (14.1)
]. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions, occurring in less than 10% of patients, are provided following Table 9.
The proportion of patients with dose adjustments for carboplatin (1.8% versus 3.8%), doses of carboplatin omitted (0.2% versus 0), and discontinuing treatment for treatment-related adverse reactions (10.9% versus 9.8%), were similar between arms. Dose adjustment for gemcitabine for injection occurred in 10.4% of patients and gemcitabine for injection dose was omitted in 13.7% of patients in the gemcitabine for injection /carboplatin arm.
Table 9: Per-Patient Incidence of Adverse Reactions in Randomized Trial of Gencitabine For Injection plus Carboplatin versus Carboplatin in Ovarian Cancer Occurring at Higher Incidence in Gemcitabine For Injection-Treated Patients [Between Arm Difference of ≥ 5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)]
| Gemcitabine For Injection plus Carboplatin (N=175) | | | Carboplatin (N=174) | | |
| | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 | All Grades | Grade 3 | Grade 4 |
| Laboratoryb | | | | | | |
| Hematologic | | | | | | |
| Neutropenia | 90 | 42 | 29 | 58 | 11 | 1 |
| Anemia | 86 | 22 | 6 | 75 | 9 | 2 |
| Thrombocytopenia | 78 | 30 | 5 | 57 | 10 | 1 |
| RBC Transfusionsc | 38 | | | 15 | | |
| Platelet Transfusionsc | 9 | | | 3 | | |
| Non–laboratoryb
| | | | | | |
| Nausea | 69 | 6 | 0 | 61 | 3 | 0 |
| Alopecia | 49 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| Vomiting | 46 | 6 | 0 | 36 | 2 | <1 |
| Constipation | 42 | 6 | 1 | 37 | 3 | 0 |
| Fatigue | 40 | 3 | <1 | 32 | 5 | 0 |
| Diarrhea | 25 | 3 | 0 | 14 | <1 | 0 |
| Stomatitis/ pharyngitis | 22 | <1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
a Grade based on Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Version 2.0.
b Regardless of causality.
c Percent of patients receiving transfusions. Transfusions are not CTC–graded events. Blood transfusions included both packed red blood cells and whole blood.
Hematopoietic growth factors were administered more frequently in the gemcitabine for injection-containing arm: granulocyte growth factors (23.6% and 10.1%) and erythropoietic agents (7.3% and 3.9%).
The following clinically relevant, Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the gemcitabine for injection plus carboplatin arm: dyspnea (3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic event (2.3% versus 1.1 %), motor neuropathy (1.1% versus 0.6%), and rash/desquamation (0.6% versus 0).