AROVYN- tulathromycin injection

Arovyn by

Drug Labeling and Warnings

Arovyn by is a Animal medication manufactured, distributed, or labeled by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Drug facts, warnings, and ingredients follow.

Drug Details [pdf]

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Injectable Solution
Antibiotic

100 mg of tulathromycin/mL

397541 R1
SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

For use in beef cattle (including suckling calves), non-lactating dairy cattle (including dairy calves), veal calves, and swine. Not for use in female dairy cattle 20 months of age or older.
SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

CAUTION: Federal (USA) law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian.
DESCRIPTION

AROVYN Injectable Solution is a ready-to-use sterile parenteral preparation containing tulathromycin, a semi-synthetic macrolide antibiotic of the subclass triamilide. Each mL of AROVYN contains 100 mg of tulathromycin, 500 mg propylene glycol, 19.2 mg citric acid and 5 mg monothioglycerol. Sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid may be added to adjust pH. AROVYN consists of an equilibrated mixture of two isomeric forms of tulathromycin in a 9:1 ratio.

Structures of the isomers are shown below.

Figure 1.

The chemical names of the isomers are (2R,3S,4R,5R,8R,10R,11R,12S,13S,14R)-13-[[2,6-dideoxy-3-C-methyl-3-O-methyl-4-C-[(propylamino)methyl]-α-L-ribo-hexopyranosyl]oxy] -2-ethyl-3,4,10-trihydroxy-3,5,8,10,12,14-hexamethyl-11-[[3,4,6-trideoxy-3-(dimethylamino)-β-D-xylo-hexopyranosyl]-oxy]-1-oxa-6- azacyclopentadecan-15-one and (2R,3R,6R,8R,9R,10S,11S,12R)-11-[[2,6-dideoxy-3-C-methyl-3-O-methyl-4-C-[(propylamino)methyl]-α-L-ribo-hexopyranosyl]oxy]- 2-[(1R,2R)-1, 2-dihydroxy-1-methylbutyl]-8-hydroxy-3, 6,8,10,12-pentamethyl-9-[[3,4,6-trideoxy-3-(dimethylamino)-β-D-xylohexopyranosyl]oxy]-1-oxa-4- azacyclotridecan-13-one, respectively.
INDICATIONS

Beef and Non-Lactating Dairy Cattle

BRD – AROVYN Injectable Solution is indicated for the treatment of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) associated with Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis; and for the control of respiratory disease in cattle at high risk of developing BRD associated with Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis.

IBK – AROVYN Injectable Solution is indicated for the treatment of infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis (IBK) associated with Moraxella bovis.

Foot Rot – AROVYN Injectable Solution is indicated for the treatment of bovine foot rot (interdigital necrobacillosis) associated with Fusobacterium necrophorum and Porphyromonas levii.

Suckling Calves, Dairy Calves, and Veal Calves

BRD - AROVYN Injectable Solution is indicated for the treatment of BRD associated with M. haemolytica, P. multocida, H. somni, and M. bovis.

Swine

AROVYN Injectable Solution is indicated for the treatment of swine respiratory disease (SRD) associated with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Haemophilus parasuis, and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae; and for the control of SRD associated with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in groups of pigs where SRD has been diagnosed.

DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

Cattle

Inject subcutaneously as a single dose in the neck at a dosage of 2.5 mg/kg (1.1 mL/100 lb) body weight (BW). Do not inject more than 10 mL per injection site.

Table 1. AROVYN Cattle Dosing Guide
Animal Weight (Pounds)	Dose Volume (mL)
100	1.1
200	2.3
300	3.4
400	4.5
500	5.7
600	6.8
700	8.0
800	9.1
900	10.2
1000	11.4

Swine

Inject intramuscularly as a single dose in the neck at a dosage of 2.5 mg/kg (0.25 mL/22 lb) BW. Do not inject more than 2.5 mL per injection site.

Table 2. AROVYN Swine Dosing Guide
Animal Weight (Pounds)	Dose Volume (mL)
15	0.2
30	0.3
50	0.6
70	0.8
90	1.0
110	1.3
130	1.5
150	1.7
170	1.9
190	2.2
210	2.4
230	2.6
250	2.8
270	3.1
290	3.3

CONTRAINDICATIONS

The use of AROVYN Injectable Solution is contraindicated in animals previously found to be hypersensitive to the drug.
WARNINGS

FOR USE IN ANIMALS ONLY.

NOT FOR HUMAN USE.

KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN.

NOT FOR USE IN CHICKENS OR TURKEYS.

RESIDUE WARNINGS

Cattle

Cattle intended for human consumption must not be slaughtered within 18 days from the last treatment. This drug is not approved for use in female dairy cattle 20 months of age or older, including dry dairy cows. Use in these cattle may cause drug residues in milk and/or in calves born to these cows.

Swine

Swine intended for human consumption must not be slaughtered within 5 days from the last treatment.
PRECAUTIONS

Cattle

The eﬀects of AROVYN on bovine reproductive performance, pregnancy, and lactation have not been determined. Subcutaneous injection can cause a transient local tissue reaction that may result in trim loss of edible tissue at slaughter.

Swine

The eﬀects of AROVYN on porcine reproductive performance, pregnancy, and lactation have not been determined. Intramuscular injection can cause a transient local tissue reaction that may result in trim loss of edible tissue at slaughter.
ADVERSE REACTIONS

Cattle

In one BRD ﬁeld study, two calves treated with tulathromycin injection at 2.5 mg/kg BW exhibited transient hypersalivation. One of these calves also exhibited transient dyspnea, which may have been related to pneumonia.

Swine

In one ﬁeld study, one out of 40 pigs treated with tulathromycin injection at 2.5 mg/kg BW exhibited mild salivation that resolved in less than four hours.
POST APPROVAL EXPERIENCE

The following adverse events are based on post approval adverse drug experience reporting. Not all adverse events are reported to the FDA CVM. It is not always possible to reliably estimate the adverse event frequency or establish a causal relationship to product exposure using these data. The following adverse events are listed in decreasing order of reporting frequency in cattle: Injection site reactions and anaphylaxis/anaphylactoid reactions. For a complete listing of adverse reactions for tulathromycin injectable solution reported to the CVM see: http://www.fda.gov/reportanimalae.
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

At physiological pH, tulathromycin (a weak base) is approximately 50 times more soluble in hydrophilic than hydrophobic media. This solubility proﬁle is consistent with the extracellular pathogen activity typically associated with the macrolides.1 Markedly higher tulathromycin concentrations are observed in the lungs as compared to the plasma. The extent to which lung concentrations represent free (active) drug was not examined. Therefore, the clinical relevance of these elevated lung concentrations is undetermined. Although the relationship between tulathromycin and the characteristics of its antimicrobial eﬀects has not been characterized, as a class, macrolides tend to be primarily bacteriostatic, but may be bactericidal against some pathogens.2 They also tend to exhibit concentration independent killing; the rate of bacterial eradication does not change once serum drug concentrations reach 2 to 3 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the targeted pathogen. Under these conditions, the time that serum concentrations remain above the MIC becomes the major determinant of antimicrobial activity. Macrolides also exhibit a post-antibiotic eﬀect (PAE), the duration of which tends to be both drug and pathogen dependent. In general, by increasing the macrolide concentration and the exposure time, the PAE will increase to some maximal duration. Of the two variables, concentration and exposure time, drug concentration tends to be the most powerful determinant of the duration of PAE. Tulathromycin is eliminated from the body primarily unchanged via biliary excretion.

1 Carbon, C. 1998. Pharmacodynamics of Macrolides, Azalides, and Streptogramins: Eﬀect on Extracellular Pathogens. Clin. Infect. Dis., 27:28-32.

2 Nightingale, C.J. 1997. Pharmacokinetics and P harmacodynamics of Newer Macrolides. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 16:438-443.

Cattle

Following subcutaneous administration into the neck of feeder calves at a dosage of 2.5 mg/kg BW, tulathromycin is rapidly and nearly completely absorbed. Peak plasma concentrations generally occur within 15 minutes after dosing and product relative bioavailability exceeds 90%. Total systemic clearance is approximately 170 mL/hr/kg. Tulathromycin distributes extensively into body tissues, as evidenced by volume of distribution values of approximately 11 L/kg in healthy ruminating calves.3 This extensive volume of distribution is largely responsible for the long elimination half-life of this compound [approximately 2.75 days in the plasma (based on quantiﬁable terminal plasma drug concentrations) versus 8.75 days for total lung concentrations (based on data from healthy animals)]. Linear pharmacokinetics are observed with subcutaneous doses ranging from 1.27 mg/kg BW to 5.0 mg/kg BW. No pharmacokinetic diﬀerences are observed in castrated male versus female calves.

3 Clearance and volume estimates are based on intersubject comparisons of 2.5 mg/kg BW administered by either subcutaneous or intravenous injection.

Swine

Following intramuscular administration to feeder pigs at a dosage of 2.5 mg/kg BW, tulathromycin is completely and rapidly absorbed (Tmax ~0.25 hour). Subsequently, the drug rapidly distributes into body tissues, achieving a volume of distribution exceeding 15 L/kg. The free drug is rapidly cleared from the systemic circulation (CLsystemic = 187 mL/hr/kg). However, it has a long terminal elimination half-life (60 to 90 hours) owing to its extensive volume of distribution. Although pulmonary tulathromycin concentrations are substantially higher than concentrations observed in the plasma, the clinical signiﬁcance of these ﬁndings is undetermined. There are no gender diﬀerences in swine tulathromycin pharmacokinetics.

MICROBIOLOGY

Cattle

Tulathromycin has demonstrated in vitro activity against Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and Mycoplasma bovis, four pathogens associated with BRD; against Moraxella bovis associated with IBK; and against Fusobacterium necrophorum and Porphyromonas levii associated with bovine foot rot.

The MICs of tulathromycin against indicated BRD and IBK pathogens were determined using methods recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, M31-A2). The MICs against foot rot pathogens were also determined using methods recommended by the CLSI (M11-A6). All MIC values were determined using the 9:1 isomer ratio of this compound.

BRD - The MICs of tulathromycin were determined for BRD isolates obtained from calves enrolled in therapeutic and at-risk ﬁeld studies in the U.S. in 1999. In the therapeutic studies, isolates were obtained from pretreatment nasopharyngeal swabs from all study calves, and from lung swabs or lung tissue of saline-treated calves that died. In the at-risk studies, isolates were obtained from nasopharyngeal swabs of saline-treated non-responders, and from lung swabs or lung tissue of saline-treated calves that died. The results are shown in Table 3.

IBK - The MICs of tulathromycin were determined for Moraxella bovis isolates obtained from calves enrolled in IBK ﬁeld studies in the U.S. in 2004. Isolates were obtained from pre-treatment conjunctival swabs of calves with clinical signs of IBK enrolled in the tulathromycin injection-treated and saline-treated groups. The results are shown in Table 3.

Foot Rot - The MICs of tulathromycin were determined for Fusobacterium necrophorum and Porphyromonas levii obtained from cattle enrolled in foot rot ﬁeld studies in the U.S. and Canada in 2007. Isolates were obtained from pretreatment interdigital biopsies and swabs of cattle with clinical signs of foot rot enrolled in the tulathromycin injection-treated and saline-treated groups. The results are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Tulathromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values* for indicated pathogens isolated from ﬁeld studies evaluating BRD and IBK in the U.S. and from foot rot ﬁeld studies in the U.S. and Canada.
Indicated pathogen	Date isolated	No. of isolates	MIC50† (ug/mL)	MIC90† (ug/mL)	MIC range (ug/mL)
* The correlation between in vitro susceptibility data and clinical eﬀectiveness is unknown. † The lowest MIC to encompass 50% and 90% of the most susceptible isolates, respectively.
Mannheimia haemolytica	1999	642	2	2	0.5 to 64
Pasteurella multocida	1999	221	0.5	1	0.25 to 64
Histophilus somni	1999	36	4	4	1 to 4
Mycoplasma bovis	1999	43	0.125	1	≤ 0.063 to > 64
Moraxella bovis	2004	55	0.5	0.5	0.25 to 1
Fusobacterium necrophorum	2007	116	2	64	≤ 0.25 to > 128
Porphyromonas levii	2007	103	8	128	≤ 0.25 to > 128

Swine

In vitro activity of tulathromycin has been demonstrated against Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, Bordetella bronchiseptica, Haemophilus parasuis, and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. The MICs of tulathromycin against indicated SRD pathogens were determined using methods recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI, M31-A and M31-A3). MICs for Haemophilus parasuis were determined using Veterinary Fastidious Medium and were incubated up to 48 hours at 35 to 37°C in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. All MIC values were determined using the 9:1 isomer ratio of this compound. Isolates obtained in 2000 and 2002 were from lung samples from saline-treated pigs and non-treated sentinel pigs enrolled in Treatment of SRD ﬁeld studies in the U.S. and Canada. Isolates obtained in 2007 and 2008 were from lung samples from saline-treated and tulathromycin injection-treated pigs enrolled in the Control of SRD ﬁeld study in the U.S. and Canada. The results are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Tulathromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values* for indicated pathogens isolated from ﬁeld studies evaluating SRD in the U.S. and Canada.
Indicated pathogen	Date isolated	No. of isolates	MIC50† (ug/mL)	MIC90† (ug/mL)	MIC range (ug/mL)
* The correlation between in vitro susceptibility data and clinical eﬀectiveness is unknown. † The lowest MIC to encompass 50% and 90% of the most susceptible isolates, respectively.
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae	2000-2002	135	16	32	16 to 32
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae	2007-2008	88	16	16	4 to 32
Haemophilus parasuis	2000-2002	31	1	2	0.25 to > 64
Pasteurella multocida	2000-2002	55	1	2	0.5 to > 64
Pasteurella multocida	2007-2008	40	1	2	≤ 0.03 to > 2
Bordetella bronchiseptica	2000-2002	42	4	8	2 to 8

EFFECTIVENESS

Cattle

BRD – In a multi-location ﬁeld study, 314 calves with naturally occurring BRD were treated with tulathromycin injection. Responses to treatment were compared to saline-treated controls. A cure was deﬁned as a calf with normal attitude/activity, normal respiration, and a rectal temperature of ≤ 104°F on Day 14. The cure rate was signiﬁcantly higher (P ≤ 0.05) in tulathromycin injection-treated calves (78%) compared to saline-treated calves (24%). There were two BRD-related deaths in the tulathromycin injection-treated calves compared to nine BRD-related deaths in the saline-treated calves.

Fifty-two tulathromycin injection-treated calves and 27 saline-treated calves from the multi-location ﬁeld BRD treatment study had Mycoplasma bovis identiﬁed in cultures from pre-treatment nasopharyngeal swabs. Of the 52 tulathromycin injection-treated calves, 37 (71.2%) calves were categorized as cures and 15 (28.8%) calves were categorized as treatment failures. Of the 27 saline-treated calves, 4 (14.8%) calves were categorized as cures and 23 (85.2%) calves were treatment failures.

A Bayesian meta-analysis was conducted to compare the BRD treatment success rate in young calves (calves weighing 250 lbs or less and fed primarily a milk-based diet) treated with tulathromycin injection to the success rate in older calves (calves weighing more than 250 lbs and fed primarily a roughage and grain-based diet) treated with tulathromycin injection. The analysis included data from four BRD treatment eﬀectiveness studies conducted for the approval of tulathromycin injection in the U.S. and nine contemporaneous studies conducted in Europe.

The analysis showed that the BRD treatment success rate in young calves was at least as good as the BRD treatment success rate in older calves. As a result, tulathromycin injection is considered eﬀective for the treatment of BRD associated with M. haemolytica, P. multocida, H. somni, and M. bovis in suckling calves, dairy calves, and veal calves.

In another multi-location ﬁeld study with 399 calves at high risk of developing BRD, administration of tulathromycin injection resulted in a signiﬁcantly reduced incidence of BRD (11%) compared to saline-treated calves (59%). Eﬀectiveness evaluation was based on scored clinical signs of normal attitude/activity, normal respiration, and a rectal temperature of ≤ 104°F on Day 14. There were no BRD-related deaths in the tulathromycin injection-treated calves compared to two BRD-related deaths in the saline-treated calves. Fifty saline-treated calves classiﬁed as non-responders in this study had Mycoplasma bovis identiﬁed in cultures of post-treatment nasopharyngeal swabs or lung tissue.

Two induced infection model studies were conducted to conﬁrm the eﬀectiveness of tulathromycin injection against Mycoplasma bovis. A total of 166 calves were inoculated intratracheally with ﬁeld strains of Mycoplasma bovis. When calves became pyrexic and had abnormal respiration scores, they were treated with either tulathromycin injection (2.5 mg/kg BW) subcutaneously or an equivalent volume of saline. Calves were observed for signs of BRD for 14 days post-treatment, then were euthanized and necropsied. In both studies, mean lung lesion percentages were statistically signiﬁcantly lower in the tulathromycin injection-treated calves compared with saline-treated calves (11.3% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.0001 and 15.0% vs. 30.7%, P < 0.0001).

IBK – Two ﬁeld studies were conducted evaluating tulathromycin injection for the treatment of IBK associated with Moraxella bovis in 200 naturally-infected calves. The primary clinical endpoint of these studies was cure rate, deﬁned as a calf with no clinical signs of IBK and no corneal ulcer, assessed on Days 5, 9, 13, 17, and 21. Time to improvement, deﬁned as the ﬁrst day on which a calf had no clinical signs of IBK in both eyes, provided that those scores were maintained at the next day of observation, was assessed as a secondary variable. At all time points, in both studies, the cure rate was signiﬁcantly higher (P < 0.05) for tulathromycin injection-treated calves compared to saline-treated calves. Additionally, time to improvement was signiﬁcantly less (P < 0.0001) in both studies for tulathromycin injection-treated calves compared to saline-treated calves.

Foot Rot - The eﬀectiveness of tulathromycin injection for the treatment of bovine foot rot was evaluated in 170 cattle in two ﬁeld studies. Cattle diagnosed with bovine foot rot were enrolled and treated with a single subcutaneous dose of tulathromycin injection (2.5 mg/kg BW) or an equivalent volume of saline. Cattle were clinically evaluated 7 days after treatment for treatment success, which was based on deﬁned decreases in lesion, swelling, and lameness scores. In both studies, the treatment success percentage was statistically signiﬁcantly higher in tulathromycin injection-treated calves compared with saline-treated calves (60% vs. 8%, P < 0.0001 and 83.3% vs. 50%, P = 0.0088).

Swine

In a multi-location ﬁeld study to evaluate the treatment of naturally occurring SRD, 266 pigs were treated with tulathromycin injection. Responses to treatment were compared to saline-treated controls. Success was deﬁned as a pig with normal attitude, normal respiration, and rectal temperature of < 104°F on Day 7. The treatment success rate was signiﬁcantly greater (P ≤ 0.05) in tulathromycin injection-treated pigs (70.5%) compared to saline-treated pigs (46.1%). M. hyopneumoniae was isolated from 106 saline-treated and non-treated sentinel pigs in this study.

Two induced infection model studies were conducted to conﬁrm the eﬀectiveness of tulathromycin injection against M. hyopneumoniae. Ten days after inoculation intranasally and intratracheally with a ﬁeld strain of M. hyopneumoniae, 144 pigs were treated with either tulathromycin injection (2.5 mg/kg BW) intramuscularly or an equivalent volume of saline. Pigs were euthanized and necropsied 10 days post-treatment. The mean percentage of gross pneumonic lung lesions was statistically signiﬁcantly lower (P < 0.0001) for tulathromycin injection-treated pigs than for saline-treated pigs in both studies (8.52% vs. 23.62% and 11.31% vs. 26.42%).

The eﬀectiveness of tulathromycin injection for the control of SRD was evaluated in a multi-location natural infection ﬁeld study. When at least 15% of the study candidates showed clinical signs of SRD, all pigs were enrolled and treated with tulathromycin injection (226 pigs) or saline (227 pigs). Responses to treatment were evaluated on Day 7. Success was deﬁned as a pig with normal attitude, normal respiration, and rectal temperature of < 104°F. The treatment success rate was signiﬁcantly greater (P < 0.05) in tulathromycin injection-treated pigs compared to saline-treated pigs (59.2% vs. 41.2%).

ANIMAL SAFETY

Cattle

Safety studies were conducted in feeder calves receiving a single subcutaneous dose of 25 mg/kg BW, or 3 weekly subcutaneous doses of 2.5, 7.5, or 12.5 mg/kg BW. In all groups, transient indications of pain after injection were seen, including head shaking and pawing at the ground. Injection site swelling, discoloration of the subcutaneous tissues at the injection site and corresponding histopathologic changes were seen in animals in all dosage groups. These lesions showed signs of resolving over time. No other drug-related lesions were observed macroscopically or microscopically.

An exploratory study was conducted in feeder calves receiving a single subcutaneous dose of 10, 12.5, or 15 mg/kg BW. Macroscopically, no lesions were observed. Microscopically, minimal to mild myocardial degeneration was seen in one of six calves administered 12.5 mg/kg BW and two of six calves administered 15 mg/kg BW.

A safety study was conducted in preruminant calves 13 to 27 days of age receiving 2.5 mg/kg BW or 7.5 mg/kg BW once subcutaneously. With the exception of minimal to mild injection site reactions, no drug-related clinical signs or other lesions were observed macroscopically or microscopically.

Swine

Safety studies were conducted in pigs receiving a single intramuscular dose of 25 mg/kg BW, or 3 weekly intramuscular doses of 2.5, 7.5, or 12.5 mg/kg BW. In all groups, transient indications of pain after injection were seen, including restlessness and excessive vocalization. Tremors occurred brieﬂy in one animal receiving 7.5 mg/kg BW. Discoloration and edema of injection site tissues and corresponding histopathologic changes were seen in animals at all dosages and resolved over time. No other drug-related lesions were observed macroscopically or microscopically.

STORAGE CONDITIONS

Store below 30°C (86°F), with excursions up to 40°C (104°F). Use this product within 84 days of the ﬁrst puncture and puncture a maximum of 20 times. If more than 20 punctures are anticipated, the use of automatic injection equipment or a repeater syringe is recommended. When using a draw-oﬀ spike or needle with bore diameter larger than 16 gauge, discard any product remaining in the vial immediately after use.

HOW SUPPLIED

AROVYN Injectable Solution is available in the following package sizes:

50 mL vial
100 mL vial
250 mL vial
500 mL vial

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Approved by FDA under ANADA # 200-715

Tulathromycin (active ingred.) made in China. Formulated in Germany.

Distributed by:
Intervet Inc. (d/b/a Merck Animal Health), Madison, NJ 07940

To report suspected adverse events, for technical assistance or to obtain a copy of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS), contact Merck Animal Health at 1-800-211-3573. For additional information about adverse drug experience reporting for animal drugs, contact FDA at 1-888-FDA-VETS or online at http://www.FDA.gov/reportanimalae.

TAKE TIME

OBSERVE LABEL DIRECTIONS

MERCK
Animal Health

Rev: 05/2022

PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL - 50 mL Bottle Carton

Arovyn™
(tulathromycin injection)
Injection Solution
Antibiotic

100 mg of tulathromycin/mL

For use in beef cattle (including suckling
calves), non-lactating dairy cattle (including
dairy calves), veal calves, and swine. Not for
use in female dairy cattle 20 months of age
or older.

CAUTION: Federal (USA) law restricts this
drug to use by or on the order of a licensed
veterinarian.

Net Contents: 50 mL

Approved by FDA under ANADA # 200-715

MERCK
Animal Health

PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL - 50 mL Bottle Carton

INGREDIENTS AND APPEARANCE

AROVYN
tulathromycin injection

Product Information
Product Type	PRESCRIPTION ANIMAL DRUG	Item Code (Source)	NDC: 0061-6607
Route of Administration	SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAMUSCULAR

Ingredient Name	Basis of Strength	Strength
Active Ingredient/Active Moiety
tulathromycin (UNII: Q839I13422) (tulathromycin - UNII:Q839I13422)	tulathromycin	100 mg in 1 mL

#	Item Code	Package Description
Packaging
1	NDC: 0061-6607-02	50 mL in 1 VIAL, GLASS
2	NDC: 0061-6607-03	100 mL in 1 VIAL, GLASS
3	NDC: 0061-6607-04	250 mL in 1 VIAL, GLASS
4	NDC: 0061-6607-05	500 mL in 1 VIAL, GLASS

Marketing Category	Application Number or Monograph Citation	Marketing Start Date	Marketing End Date
Marketing Information
ANADA	ANADA200715	02/09/2022

Labeler - Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp (001317601)

Trademark Results [Arovyn]

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Company Trademark Application Date
AROVYN 88726728 not registered Live/Pending	Intervet Inc. 2019-12-13

Animal Weight (Pounds)	Dose Volume (mL)
15	0.2
30	0.3
50	0.6
70	0.8
90	1.0
110	1.3
130	1.5
150	1.7
170	1.9
190	2.2
210	2.4
230	2.6
250	2.8
270	3.1
290	3.3

Animal Weight (Pounds)	Dose Volume (mL)
15	0.2
30	0.3
50	0.6
70	0.8
90	1.0
110	1.3
130	1.5
150	1.7
170	1.9
190	2.2
210	2.4
230	2.6
250	2.8
270	3.1
290	3.3