ARYMO ER contains morphine, a substance with a high potential for abuse similar to other opioids including fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, methadone, oxycodone, oxymorphone, and tapentadol. ARYMO ER can be abused and is subject to misuse, addiction, and criminal diversion [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1)].
The high drug content in extended-release formulations adds to the risk of adverse outcomes from misuse and abuse.
All patients treated with opioids require careful monitoring for signs of abuse and addiction because use of opioid analgesic products carries the risk of addiction even under appropriate medical use.
Prescription drug abuse is the intentional non-therapeutic use of a prescription drug, even once, for its rewarding psychological or physiological effects.
Drug addiction is a cluster of behavioral, cognitive, and physiological phenomena that develop after repeated substance use and includes: a strong desire to take the drug, difficulties in controlling its use, persisting in its use despite harmful consequences, a higher priority given to drug use than to other activities and obligations, increased tolerance, and sometimes a physical withdrawal.
“Drug-seeking” behavior is very common in persons with substance use disorders. Drug-seeking tactics include emergency calls or visits near the end of office hours, refusal to undergo appropriate examination, testing, or referral, repeated loss of prescriptions, tampering with prescriptions and reluctance to provide prior medical records or contact information for other healthcare provider(s). “Doctor shopping” (visiting multiple prescribers to obtain additional prescriptions) is common among drug abusers and people suffering from untreated addiction. Preoccupation with achieving adequate pain relief can be appropriate behavior in a patient with poor pain control.
Abuse and addiction are separate and distinct from physical dependence and tolerance. Healthcare providers should be aware that addiction may not be accompanied by concurrent tolerance and symptoms of physical dependence in all addicts. In addition, abuse of opioids can occur in the absence of true addiction.
ARYMO ER, like other opioids, can be diverted for non-medical use into illicit channels of distribution. Careful record-keeping of prescribing information, including quantity, frequency, and renewal requests, as required by state and federal law, is strongly advised.
Proper assessment of the patient, proper prescribing practices, periodic re-evaluation of therapy, and proper dispensing and storage are appropriate measures that help to reduce abuse of opioid drugs.
Risks Specific to Abuse of ARYMO ER
ARYMO ER is for oral use only. Abuse of ARYMO ER poses a risk of overdose and death. This risk is increased with concurrent abuse of ARYMO ER with alcohol and other central nervous system depressants. Attempting to cut, break, chew, crush, or dissolve ARYMO ER tablets may compromise some of the extended-release properties, resulting in delivery of morphine that could lead to overdose and death.
Parenteral abuse of ARYMO ER can be expected to result in local tissue necrosis, infection, pulmonary granulomas, and increased risk of endocarditis and valvular heart injury. Parenteral drug abuse is commonly associated with transmission of infectious diseases such as hepatitis and HIV.
Abuse Deterrence Studies
ARYMO ER is formulated with inactive ingredients that make the tablet more difficult to manipulate for misuse and abuse.
To evaluate the ability of ARYMO ER to reduce the potential for misuse and abuse, a series of abuse-deterrent in vitro laboratory physical manipulation, chemical extraction, and syringeability studies were conducted.
One oral human abuse potential study and one intranasal human abuse potential study were conducted. In each study both
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (subjective measures) data were collected. These data are described below for both studies.
In Vitro Testing
In vitro physical and chemical manipulation studies were performed to evaluate the ability of different methods to defeat the extended-release properties. The results of this testing demonstrated that ARYMO ER tablets, in comparison to morphine sulfate extended-release tablets, have increased resistance to cutting, crushing, grinding or breaking using a variety of tools. When subjected to a liquid environment, the manipulated ARYMO ER tablets form a viscous hydrogel (i.e., a gelatinous mass) that resists passage through a hypodermic needle.
Oral Human Abuse Potential Study
Pharmacokinetic Results:
The pharmacokinetic profile of manipulated ARYMO ER was characterized following oral administration. The study was conducted in a randomized cross-over design. The pharmacokinetic profile of manipulated and intact ARYMO ER compared to crushed morphine sulfate extended-release was evaluated in 38 subjects after oral administration. The results are summarized in Table 2 and demonstrate that oral ingestion of manipulated ARYMO ER resulted in a higher Cmax, but similar AUC, when compared to intact ARYMO ER. In addition, manipulated ARYMO ER had a lower Cmax and longer Tmax than crushed morphine sulfate extended-release tablets.
Table 2: Results from Oral Pharmacokinetic Study |
| PK Parameter | ARYMO ER | Crushed Morphine Sulfate Extended-Release (n = 39) |
Manipulated (n = 38) | Intact (n = 38) |
| Cmax (ng/mL) |
| Mean (SD) | 28.7 (9.1) | 17.8 (6.6) | 42.3 (14.3) |
| Median (Range) | 29.2 (12.5, 47.8) | 16.7 (8.5, 32.3) | 42.2 (14.2, 79.0) |
| Tmax (h) |
| Median (Range) | 2.1 (0.9, 4.2) | 4.1 (1.6, 6.1) | 0.9 (0.6, 4.1) |
| AUC0–∞ (h*ng/mL) |
| Mean (SD) | 159.3 (36.8) | 168.0 (53.6) | 182.1 (49.9) |
| Median (Range) | 157.1 (94.5, 215.3) | 159.4 (80.9, 274.8) | 185.5 (61.8, 284.1) |
Pharmacodynamic Results:
An oral abuse potential study was conducted in 39 subjects who were non-dependent recreational opioid users; 38 subjects completed the study. Treatment arms included manipulated ARYMO ER 60 mg tablets (taken with juice), intact ARYMO ER 60 mg tablets (taken with juice), crushed 60 mg morphine sulfate extended-release tablets (mixed in juice), and placebo.
Drug liking was measured on a 100 mm bipolar visual analog scale (VAS) where 50 represents a neutral response of “neither like nor dislike”, 0 represents “strong disliking”, and 100 represents “strong liking.” Response to whether the subject would take the study drug again was also measured on a bipolar scale of 0 to 100 where 50 represents a neutral response (‘do not care’), 0 represents the strongest negative response (‘definitely would not’) and 100 represents the strongest positive response (‘definitely would’).
The study demonstrated that the oral administration of manipulated ARYMO ER resulted in a statistically lower mean drug liking score than the oral administration of crushed morphine sulfate extended-release tablets. However, the difference between manipulated ARYMO ER and crushed morphine sulfate extended-release tablets for Take Drug Again was not statistically significant, indicating that the difference in drug liking scores was not clinically meaningful.
These results are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3: Summary of Maximum Scores (Emax) for Drug Liking and Take Drug Again VAS1 Following Oral Administration of Manipulated and Intact ARYMO ER and Crushed Morphine Sulfate Extended-Release in Non-Dependent Recreational Opioid Users |
| Parameter | ARYMO ER | Crushed Morphine Sulfate Extended-Release (n = 38) | Placebo (n = 38) |
Manipulated (n = 38) | Intact (n = 38) |
| Maximum Drug Liking (Emax) |
| Mean (SD) | 68.3 (12.3) | 63.2 (10.1) | 73.3 (9.8) | 53.3 (7.8) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 67.0 (61.0, 75.0) | 62.0 (56.0, 68.0) | 74.0 (68.0, 79.0) | 50.0 (50.0, 52.0) |
| Take Drug Again (Emax) |
| Mean (SD) | 62.9 (19.6) | 54.8 (20.8) | 70.1 (17.5) | 51.0 (10.2) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 61.5 (51.0, 71.0) | 56.0 (50.0, 65.0) | 68.0 (56.0, 80.0) | 50.0 (50.0, 50.0) |
Intranasal Human Abuse Potential Study
Pharmacokinetic Results:
The pharmacokinetic profile of manipulated ARYMO ER compared to crushed morphine sulfate extended-release was evaluated
following intranasal administration in 46 subjects. The study was conducted in a randomized cross-over design. Subjects were
non-dependent recreational opioid users with insufflation experience. The preparation of ARYMO ER in this study required a
multi-step procedure (mechanical and electrical manipulations) compared to morphine sulfate extended-release tablets, which were
crushed in a single-step (mechanical) procedure. Treatment arms included ARYMO ER 60 mg tablet manipulated, morphine sulfate
extended-release 60 mg tablet crushed, oral intact ARYMO ER 60 mg tablet, and placebo.
The pharmacokinetic parameters that were measured include Cmax, Tmax and overall exposure (AUC0–∞).
The results are summarized in Table 4 and demonstrate that snorting manipulated ARYMO ER had a lower Cmax, longer Tmax and lower
overall exposure compared to snorting crushed morphine sulfate extended-release tablets. The pharmacokinetic profile of
manipulated Arymo ER is consistent with an oral intact extended-release profile
Table 4: Pharmacokinetic Results from Intranasal Study |
| PK Parameter | Manipulated ARYMO ER (n = 45) | Intact ARYMO ER (Oral) (n = 46) | Crushed Morphine Sulfate
Extended- Release (n = 46) |
| Cmax (ng/mL) |
| Mean (SD) | 19.0 (9.6) | 17.2 (4.3) | 36.3 (12.9) |
| Median (Range) | 19.8 (4.2-40.1) | 18.1 (9.3-24.8) | 34.6 (6.5-62.3) |
| Tmax (h) |
| Median (Range) | 2.2 (1.1-6.1) | 3.7 (1.1-6.2) | 1.1 (0.4-2.7) |
| AUC0–∞ (h*ng/mL) |
| Mean (SD) | 125.2 (63.6) | 149.0 (25.5) | 181.6 (49.7) |
| Median (Range) | 137.7 (20.8-244.2) | 153.4 (85.6-188.6) | 177.6 (29.8-286.0) |
Pharmacodynamic Results:
In the intranasal abuse potential study, drug liking was measured on a 100 mm bipolar visual analog scale (VAS)
where 50 represents a neutral response of “neither like nor dislike”, 0 represents “strong disliking”, and 100 represents
“strong liking.” Response to whether the subject would take the study drug again was also measured on a bipolar scale of
0 to 100 where 50 represents a neutral response (‘do not care’), 0 represents the strongest negative response
(‘definitely would not’) and 100 represents the strongest positive response (‘definitely would’).
The study results demonstrated that subjects who snorted manipulated ARYMO ER reported statistically significantly lower
maximum scores (Emax) for drug liking and take drug again compared to snorting crushed morphine sulfate extended-release tablets.
These results are summarized in Table 5.
Table 5: Summary of Maximum Scores (Emax) for Drug Liking and Take Drug Again1 following Intranasal Administration of
Manipulated ARYMO ER and Crushed Morphine Sulfate Extended-Release Tablets in Non-Dependent Recreational Opioid Users |
| Parameter | Manipulated ARYMO ER (n = 46) | Crushed Morphine Sulfate Extended-Release (n = 46) | Placebo (n = 46) |
| Maximum Drug Liking (Emax) |
| Mean (SD) | 65.5 (14.3) | 77.7 (11.7) | 54.7 (10.6) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 62.0 (52.0, 76.0) | 77.5 (70.0, 85.0) | 51.0 (50.0, 58.0) |
| Take Drug Again (Emax) |
| Mean (SD) | 43.1 (29.6) | 69.9 (27.4) | 52.5 (12.7) |
| Median (Q1, Q3) | 50.0 (19.0, 66.0) | 73.0 (57.0, 90.0) | 50.0 (50.0, 51.0) |
Summary
The in vitro data demonstrate that ARYMO ER has physical and chemical properties expected to make abuse by injection difficult.
The data from the in vitro studies and the intranasal clinical abuse potential study indicate that ARYMO ER has physical and
chemical properties that are expected to reduce abuse via the intranasal route.
Although the results of the oral human abuse potential study showed a difference in the Drug Liking endpoint, there was no statistically significant reduction in the response to Take Drug Again. Therefore, it cannot be concluded that ARYMO ER has physical and chemical properties that are expected to reduce abuse via the oral route.
Abuse of ARYMO ER by the intravenous and nasal routes, as well as by the oral route, is still possible.
Additional data, including epidemiological data, when available, may provide further information on the impact of the current formulation of ARYMO ER on the abuse liability of the drug. Accordingly, this section may be updated in the future as appropriate.