The safety and effectiveness of CYSVIEW to detect bladder carcinoma during cystoscopic examination were studied in two prospective, open-label, controlled clinical trials: Study 1 and Study 2.
Study 1: Patients with Known or Suspected Bladder Cancer
A total of 779 patients with known or suspected bladder cancer were randomized to a control group of 384 patients or a study drug group of 395 patients. Patients in the study drug group received CYSVIEW by bladder instillation. After bladder evacuation of CYSVIEW, lesion mapping was performed using the KARL STORZ PDD system, initially in white light (WL) mode and then in blue light (BL) mode. Patients in the control group underwent lesion mapping using only WL cystoscopy and did not receive CYSVIEW. The average age of the randomized patients was 69 years (range 24 to 96). The study population was 78% male and 94% White. All patients included in the study had a history of previous cystoscopy.
The main diagnostic efficacy outcome was assessed within the study drug group. This assessment compared lesions detected during an initial cystoscopic examination to their centralized histologic findings (the standard of truth). Following the initial diagnostic cystoscopy, patients within both study groups who had histologically confirmed Ta and/or T1 lesions underwent follow-up WL cystoscopy at 3, 6 and 9 months; these histologic evaluations were based upon the site assessments at both the initial and follow-up cystoscopy.
Diagnostic efficacy assessed the number of patients within the study drug group who had at least one additional Ta or T1 bladder cancer detected only by BL; the proportion of these patients was compared to a proposed threshold proportion of 10%. Within the study drug group, 286 patients had at least one Ta and/or T1 lesion, including 47 patients who had at least one of the lesions detected only by BL (see Table 1).
Table 1: BL Cystoscopic Ta and/or T1 Lesion Detection within the Study Drug Group| Number of patients with any Ta and/or T1 lesion detected with either WL or BL | 286 |
| Number (%) of patients with any Ta and/or T1 lesion detected only with BL | 47 (16%) |
| p-value
| 0.001 |
Some malignant lesions were detected only by WL or BL (see Table 2)
Table 2: Bladder Tumor Detection within the Study Drug Group by WL and/or BL Cystoscopy| Number of lesions | Detected by Both WL & BL | Detected by WL Only | Detected by BL Only |
|---|
| CIS, n = 66 | 33 | 6 | 27 |
| Ta, n = 580 | 472 | 52 | 56 |
| T1, n = 95 | 76 | 10 | 9 |
| T2 – T4, n = 47 | 38 | 8 | 1 |
Among the lesions detected only by BL, 23% were negative for any carcinoma-related pathology, including dysplasia. Among the lesions detected only by WL, 17% were negative for any carcinoma-related pathology, including dysplasia.
Study 2: Patients Undergoing Surveillance Cystoscopy
The study included 304 patients with a history of bladder cancer who were undergoing follow-up surveillance for tumor recurrence. The average patient age was 69 years with a range of 35 to 92 years. The study population was 80% male and 89% White.
For the initial surveillance examination, all 304 patients received CYSVIEW by bladder instillation, which was then evacuated. A surveillance cystoscopy was then performed, first using standard WL and subsequently using BL with the KARL STORZ D-Light C Photodynamic Diagnostic (PDD) System with the Flexible PDD Videoscope System. During this phase, suspected malignant lesions were counted and evaluated.
A total of 103 patients had suspected recurrence and then proceeded to a second examination in an operating room (OR). These patients received another CYSVIEW instillation, followed by WL and BL rigid cystoscopy for lesion mapping using the KARL STORZ D-Light C PDD System with the Rigid PDD Cystoscope System. All suspicious lesions were then biopsied and surgically removed by TURB.
Efficacy was assessed by determining the proportion of patients with a malignancy detected only with BL cystoscopy and not WL cystoscopy during the initial surveillance cystoscopic examination. The assessment was performed at patient-level, and compared malignancy detected during the surveillance cystoscopic examination to the centralized histologic findings (the standard of truth) obtained in the OR examination.
Table 3 shows patient-level detection of malignancy suspected in cystoscopic surveillance stage that was verified in the OR stage (n=103). Among the 103 patients, 63 patients had malignancy confirmed: 49 patients had malignancy detected by both WL and BL; 1 patient had malignancy detected by WL only; and 13 patients had malignancy detected by BL only [12.6% with 95% CI (7%, 21%), p<0.0001]. Among these 103 patients, 40 patients had false positive detections: 17 patients had false positive detection by both WL and BL; 3 patients had false positive detection by WL only; and 20 patients had false positive detection by BL only.
Table 3: Patient Level Malignancy Detection Suspected in BL Cystoscopic Surveillance and Verified in the OR | Detected by Both WL and BL | Detected by WL only | Detected by BL only | Total |
|---|
| True Positive | 49 | 1 | 13 | 63 |
| False Positive | 17 | 3 | 20 | 40 |
| Total | 66 | 4 | 33 | 103 |
Among 26 patients with confirmed CIS malignancy, 9 patients had CIS malignancy detected by BL only and 17 patients had CIS malignancy detected by both WL and BL.
In the same study, there were 315 lesions detected during the cystoscopy in the OR. Table 4 shows the detection of lesions by type of malignancy.
Table 4: Lesion Detection by Type of Malignancy as Verified in the OR| Malignancy Type | Detected by Both WL & BL | Detected by WL Only | Detected by BL Only |
|---|
| CIS, n = 43 | 24 | 3 | 16 |
| Ta, n = 94 | 61 | 9 | 24 |
| T1, n = 10 | 7 | 0 | 3 |
| T2 – T4, n = 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| PUNLMP n=3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| False positive n=160 | 65 | 22 | 73 |
| Total number of lesions | 164 | 34 | 117 |