Sevoflurane was administered to a total of 3185 patients. The types of patients are summarized as follows:
Table 5. Patients Receiving Sevoflurane in Clinical Studies| Type of Patients | Number | Studied |
| ADULT | 2223 | |
| Cesarean Delivery | | 29 |
| Cardiovascular and patients at risk of myocardial ischemia | | 246 |
| Neurosurgical | | 22 |
| Hepatic impairment | | 8 |
| Renal impairment | | 35 |
| PEDIATRIC | 962 | |
Clinical experience with these patients is described below.
Adult Anesthesia
The efficacy of sevoflurane in comparison to isoflurane, enflurane, and propofol was investigated in 3 outpatient and 25 inpatient studies involving 3591 adult patients. Sevoflurane was found to be comparable to isoflurane, enflurane, and propofol for the maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients. Patients administered sevoflurane showed shorter times (statistically significant) to some recovery events (extubation, response to command, and orientation) than patients who received isoflurane or propofol.
Mask Induction
Sevoflurane has a nonpungent odor and does not cause respiratory irritability. Sevoflurane is suitable for mask induction in adults. In 196 patients, mask induction was smooth and rapid, with complications occurring with the following frequencies: cough, 6%; breathholding, 6%; agitation, 6%; laryngospasm, 5%.
Ambulatory Surgery
Sevoflurane was compared to isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia supplemented with N2O in two studies involving 786 adult (18-84 years of age) ASA Class I, II, or III patients. Shorter times to emergence and response to commands (statistically significant) were observed with sevoflurane compared to isoflurane and propofol.
Table 6. Recovery Parameters in Two Outpatient Surgery Studies: Least Squares Mean ± SEM | Sevoflurane/N2O | Isoflurane/N2O | Sevoflurane/N2O | Propofol/N2O |
| Mean Maintenance | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 7.3 ± 2.3 |
| Anesthesia | MAC·hr. | MAC·hr. | MAC·hr. | mg/kg/hr. |
| Exposure ± SD | (n = 245) | (n = 249) | (n = 166) | (n = 166) |
| Time to Emergence (min) | 8.2 ± 0.4
(n = 246) | 9.3 ± 0.3
(n = 251) | 8.3 ± 0.7
(n = 137) | 10.4 ± 0.7
(n = 142) |
| Time to Respond to Commands (min) | 8.5 ± 0.4
(n = 246) | 9.8 ± 0.4
(n = 248) | 9.1 ± 0.7
(n = 139) | 11.5 ± 0.7
(n = 143) |
| Time to First Analgesia (min) | 45.9 ± 4.7
(n = 160) | 59.1 ± 6.0
(n = 252) | 46.1 ± 5.4
(n = 83) | 60.0 ± 4.7
(n = 88) |
| Time to Eligibility for Discharge from Recovery Area (min) | 87.6 ± 5.3
(n = 244) | 79.1 ± 5.2
(n = 252) | 103.1 ± 3.8
(n = 139) | 105.1 ± 3.7
(n = 143) |
| n = number of patients with recording of recovery events. |
Inpatient Surgery
Sevoflurane was compared to isoflurane and propofol for maintenance of anesthesia supplemented with N2O in two multicenter studies involving 741 adult ASA Class I, II or III (18-92 years of age) patients. Shorter times to emergence, command response, and first post-anesthesia analgesia (statistically significant) were observed with sevoflurane compared to isoflurane and propofol.
Table 7. Recovery Parameters in Two Inpatient Surgery Studies: Least Squares Mean ± SEM | Sevoflurane/N2O | Isoflurane/N2O | Sevoflurane/N2O | Propofol/N2O |
| Mean Maintenance | 1.27 MAC·hr. | 1.58 MAC·hr. | 1.43 MAC·hr. | 7.0 mg/kg/hr |
| Anesthesia | ± 0.05 | ± 0.06 | ± 0.94 | ± 2.9 |
| Exposure ± SD | (n = 271) | (n = 282) | (n = 93) | (n = 92) |
| Time to Emergence (min) | 11.0 ± 0.6
(n = 270) | 16.4 ± 0.6
(n = 281) | 8.8 ± 1.2
(n = 92) | 13.2 ± 1.2
(n = 92) |
| Time to Respond to Commands (min) | 12.8 ± 0.7
(n = 270) | 18.4 ± 0.7
(n = 281) | 11.0 ± 1.20
(n = 92) | 14.4 ± 1.21
(n = 91) |
| Time to First Analgesia (min) | 46.1 ± 3.0
(n = 233) | 55.4 ± 3.2
(n = 242) | 37.8 ± 3.3
(n = 82) | 49.2 ± 3.3
(n = 79) |
| Time to Eligibility for Discharge from Recovery Area (min) | 139.2 ± 15.6
(n = 268) | 165.9 ± 16.3
(n = 282) | 148.4 ± 8.9
(n = 92) | 141.4 ± 8.9
(n = 92) |
| n = number of patients with recording of recovery events. |
Pediatric Anesthesia
The concentration of sevoflurane required for maintenance of general anesthesia is age-dependent (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION). Sevoflurane or halothane was used to anesthetize 1620 pediatric patients aged 1 day to 18 years, and ASA physical status I or II (948 sevoflurane, 672 halothane). In one study involving 90 infants and children, there were no clinically significant decreases in heart rate compared to awake values at 1 MAC. Systolic blood pressure decreased 15%-20% in comparison to awake values following administration of 1 MAC sevoflurane; however, clinically significant hypotension requiring immediate intervention did not occur. Overall incidences of bradycardia [more than 20 beats/min lower than normal (80 beats/min)] in comparative studies was 3% for sevoflurane and 7% for halothane. Patients who received sevoflurane had slightly faster emergence times (12 vs. 19 minutes), and a higher incidence of post-anesthesia agitation (14% vs. 10%).
Sevoflurane (n = 91) was compared to halothane (n = 89) in a single-center study for elective repair or palliation of congenital heart disease. The patients ranged in age from 9 days to 11.8 years with an ASA physical status of II, III, and IV (18%, 68%, and 13% respectively). No significant differences were demonstrated between treatment groups with respect to the primary outcome measures: cardiovascular decompensation and severe arterial desaturation. Adverse event data was limited to the study outcome variables collected during surgery and before institution of cardiopulmonary bypass.
Mask Induction
Sevoflurane has a nonpungent odor and is suitable for mask induction in pediatric patients. In controlled pediatric studies in which mask induction was performed, the incidence of induction events is shown below (see ADVERSE REACTIONS).
Table 8. Incidence of Pediatric Induction Events | Sevoflurane (n = 836) | Halothane (n = 660) |
| Agitation | 14% | 11% |
| Cough | 6% | 10% |
| Breathholding | 5% | 6% |
| Secretions | 3% | 3% |
| Laryngospasm | 2% | 2% |
| Bronchospasm | <1% | 0% |
| n = number of patients. |
Ambulatory Surgery
Sevoflurane (n = 518) was compared to halothane (n = 382) for the maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric outpatients. All patients received N2O and many received fentanyl, midazolam, bupivacaine, or lidocaine. The time to eligibility for discharge from post-anesthesia care units was similar between agents (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and ADVERSE REACTIONS).
Cardiovascular Surgery
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery
Sevoflurane was compared to isoflurane as an adjunct with opioids in a multicenter study of 273 patients undergoing CABG surgery. Anesthesia was induced with midazolam (0.1-0.3 mg/kg); vecuronium (0.1-0.2 mg/kg), and fentanyl (5-15 mcg/kg). Both isoflurane and sevoflurane were administered at loss of consciousness in doses of 1.0 MAC and titrated until the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass to a maximum of 2.0 MAC. The total dose of fentanyl did not exceed 25 mcg/kg. The average MAC dose was 0.49 for sevoflurane and 0.53 for isoflurane. There were no significant differences in hemodynamics, cardioactive drug use, or ischemia incidence between the two groups. Outcome was also equivalent. In this small multicenter study, sevoflurane appears to be as effective and as safe as isoflurane for supplementation of opioid anesthesia for coronary bypass grafting.
Non-Cardiac Surgery Patients at Risk for Myocardial Ischemia
Sevoflurane-N2O was compared to isoflurane-N2O for maintenance of anesthesia in a multicenter study in 214 patients, age 40-87 years who were at mild-to-moderate risk for myocardial ischemia and were undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery. Forty-six percent (46%) of the operations were cardiovascular, with the remainder evenly divided between gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal and small numbers of other surgical procedures. The average duration of surgery was less than 2 hours. Anesthesia induction usually was performed with thiopental (2-5 mg/kg) and fentanyl (1-5 mcg/kg). Vecuronium (0.1-0.2 mg/kg) was also administered to facilitate intubation, muscle relaxation or immobility during surgery. The average MAC dose was 0.49 for both anesthetics. There was no significant difference between the anesthetic regimens for intraoperative hemodynamics, cardioactive drug use, or ischemic incidents, although only 83 patients in the sevoflurane group and 85 patients in the isoflurane group were successfully monitored for ischemia. The outcome was also equivalent in terms of adverse events, death, and postoperative myocardial infarction. Within the limits of this small multicenter study in patients at mild-to-moderate risk for myocardial ischemia, sevoflurane was a satisfactory equivalent to isoflurane in providing supplemental inhalation anesthesia to intravenous drugs.
Cesarean Section
Sevoflurane (n = 29) was compared to isoflurane (n = 27) in ASA Class I or II patients for the maintenance of anesthesia during cesarean section. Newborn evaluations and recovery events were recorded. With both anesthetics, Apgar scores averaged 8 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively.
Use of sevoflurane as part of general anesthesia for elective cesarean section produced no untoward effects in mother or neonate. Sevoflurane and isoflurane demonstrated equivalent recovery characteristics. There was no difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane with regard to the effect on the newborn, as assessed by Apgar Score and Neurological and Adaptive Capacity Score (average = 29.5). The safety of sevoflurane in labor and vaginal delivery has not been evaluated.
Neurosurgery
Three studies compared sevoflurane to isoflurane for maintenance of anesthesia during neurosurgical procedures. In a study of 20 patients, there was no difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane with regard to recovery from anesthesia. In 2 studies, a total of 22 patients with intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors received either sevoflurane or isoflurane. There was no difference between sevoflurane and isoflurane with regard to ICP response to inhalation of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 MAC inspired concentrations of volatile agent during N2O-O2-fentanyl anesthesia. During progressive hyperventilation from PaCO2 = 40 to PaCO2 = 30, ICP response to hypocarbia was preserved with sevoflurane at both 0.5 and 1.0 MAC concentrations. In patients at risk for elevations of ICP, sevoflurane should be administered cautiously in conjunction with ICP-reducing maneuvers such as hyperventilation.
Hepatic Impairment
A multicenter study (2 sites) compared the safety of sevoflurane and isoflurane in 16 patients with mild-to-moderate hepatic impairment utilizing the lidocaine MEGX assay for assessment of hepatocellular function. All patients received intravenous propofol (1-3 mg/kg) or thiopental (2-7 mg/kg) for induction and succinylcholine, vecuronium, or atracurium for intubation. Sevoflurane or isoflurane was administered in either 100% O2 or up to 70% N2O/O2. Neither drug adversely affected hepatic function. No serum inorganic fluoride level exceeded 45 μM/L, but sevoflurane patients had prolonged terminal disposition of fluoride, as evidenced by longer inorganic fluoride half-life than patients with normal hepatic function (23 hours vs. 10-48 hours).
Renal Impairment
Sevoflurane was evaluated in renally impaired patients with baseline serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL. Fourteen patients who received sevoflurane were compared with 12 patients who received isoflurane. In another study, 21 patients who received sevoflurane were compared with 20 patients who received enflurane. Creatinine levels increased in 7% of patients who received sevoflurane, 8% of patients who received isoflurane, and 10% of patients who received enflurane. Because of the small number of patients with renal insufficiency (baseline serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL) studied, the safety of sevoflurane administration in this group has not yet been fully established. Therefore, sevoflurane should be used with caution in patients with renal insufficiency (see WARNINGS).