The effect of food on efavirenz, lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets has not been evaluated.
EFV:
In HIV-1 infected subjects time-to-peak plasma concentrations were approximately 3 to 5 hours and steady-state plasma concentrations were reached in 6 to 10 days. EFV is highly bound (approximately 99.5 to 99.75%) to human plasma proteins, predominantly albumin. Following administration of 14C-labeled EFV, 14 to 34% of the dose was recovered in the urine (mostly as metabolites) and 16 to 61% was recovered in feces (mostly as parent drug). In vitro studies suggest CYP3A and CYP2B6 are the major isozymes responsible for EFV metabolism. EFV has been shown to induce CYP enzymes, resulting in induction of its own metabolism. EFV has a terminal half-life of 52 to 76 hours after single doses and 40 to 55 hours after multiple doses.
3TC:
Following oral administration, 3TC is rapidly absorbed and extensively distributed. After multiple dose oral administration of 3TC 300 mg once daily for 7 days to 60 healthy subjects, steady-state Cmax (Cmax,ss) was 2.04 ± 0.54 mcg per mL (mean ± SD) and the 24 hour steady state AUC (AUC24,ss) was 8.87 ± 1.83 mcg•hour per mL. Binding to plasma protein is low. Approximately 70% of an intravenous dose of 3TC is recovered as unchanged drug in the urine. Metabolism of 3TC is a minor route of elimination. In humans, the only known metabolite is the trans sulfoxide metabolite (approximately 5% of an oral dose after 12 hours). In most single-dose trials in HIV-1-infected subjects, HBV-infected subjects, or healthy subjects with serum sampling for 24 hours after dosing, the observed mean elimination half-life (t½) ranged from 5 to 7 hours. In HIV-1-infected subjects, total clearance was 398.5 ± 69.1 mL per min (mean ± SD).
TDF:
The pharmacokinetic properties of TDF are summarized in Table 6. Following oral administration of TDF, maximum tenofovir serum concentrations are achieved in 1.0 ± 0.4 hour. Less than 0.7% of tenofovir binds to human plasma proteins in vitro and the binding is independent of concentration over the range of 0.01 to 25 μg/mL. Approximately 70 to 80% of the intravenous dose of tenofovir is recovered as unchanged drug in the urine. Tenofovir is eliminated by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion. Following a single oral dose of TDF, the terminal elimination half-life of tenofovir is approximately 17 hours.
Table 6 Single Dose Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Tenofovir in Adultsa
| Tenofovir
|
Fasted Oral Bioavailabilityb (%)
| 25 (NC to 45.0)
|
Plasma Terminal Elimination Half-Lifeb (hr)
| 17 (12.0 to 25.7)
|
Cmaxc (mcg/mL)
| 0.30±0.09
|
AUCc (mcg·hr/mL)
| 2.29±0.69
|
CL/Fc (mL/min)
| 1043±115
|
CLrenalc (mL/min)
| 243±33
|
a. NC=Not calculated
b. Median (range)
c. Mean (± SD)
Special Populations
Race
EFV and 3TC: There are no significant or clinically relevant racial differences in EFV and 3TC pharmacokinetics.
Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: There were insufficient numbers from racial and ethnic groups other than Caucasian to adequately determine potential pharmacokinetic differences among these populations.
Gender:
There are no significant or clinically relevant gender differences in the pharmacokinetics of EFV, 3TC, and TDF.
Geriatric Patients:
The pharmacokinetics of 3TC and TDF have not been studied in patients over 65 years of age.
Pediatric Patients:
Efavirenz, lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tabletsshould not be administered to pediatric patients weighing less than 35 kg (77 lb).
Renal Impairment :[see Use in Specific Populations (8.6)].
The pharmacokinetics of TDF, a component of efavirenz, lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, are altered in subjects with renal impairment [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)]. In subjects with creatinine clearance below 50 mL per min or with end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis, Cmax, and AUC 0-∞ of tenofovir were increased. Efavirenz, lamivudine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets is not recommended for patients with creatinine clearance less than 50 mL per min or patients with ESRD requiring hemodialysis because it is a fixed-dose combination formulation that cannot be adjusted.
Hepatic Impairment
EFV: A multiple-dose study showed no significant effect on EFV pharmacokinetics in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class A) compared with controls. There were insufficient data to determine whether moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B or C) affects EFV pharmacokinetics.
3TC: The pharmacokinetic properties of 3TC have been determined in adults with impaired hepatic function. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not altered by diminishing hepatic function. Safety and efficacy of 3TC have not been established in the presence of decompensate liver disease.
TDF: The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir following a 300 mg single dose of TDF have been studied in non-HIV infected subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. There were no substantial alterations in tenofovir pharmacokinetics in subjects with hepatic impairment compared with unimpaired subjects. No change in TDF dosing is required in patients with hepatic impairment.
Drug Interactions Studies:[see Drug Interactions (7).]
EFV: EFV has been shown in vivo to cause hepatic enzyme induction, thus increasing the biotransformation of some drugs metabolized by CYP3A and CYP2B6. In vitro studies have shown that efavirenz inhibited CYP isozymes 2C9, 2C19, and 3A4 with Ki values (8.5 to 17 µM) in the range of observed efavirenz plasma concentrations. In in vitro studies, EFV did not inhibit CYP2E1 and inhibited CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 (Ki values 82 to 160 µM) only at concentrations well above those achieved clinically. Coadministration of EFV with drugs primarily metabolized by CYP2C9, CPY2C19, CYP3A, or CYP2B6 isozymes may result in altered plasma concentrations of the coadministered drug. Drugs which induce CYP3A and CYP2B6 activity would be expected to increase the clearance of EFV resulting in lowered plasma concentrations.
Drug interaction studies were performed with EFV and other drugs likely to be coadministered or drugs commonly used as probes for pharmacokinetic interaction. The effects of coadministration of EFV on the Cmax, AUC, and Cmin are summarized in Table 7(effect of EFV on other drugs) and Table 8(effect of other drugs on EFV). For information regarding clinical recommendations see Drug Interactions (
7.5
).
Table 7 Effect of EFV on Coadministered Drug Plasma Cmax, AUC, and Cmin
|
|---|
| Number of Subjects | Coadministered Drug (mean % change) |
|---|
Coadministered Drug | Dose | EFV Dose | Cmax (90% CI) | AUC (90% CI) | Cmin (90% CI) |
|---|
Boceprevir | 800 mg tid x 6 days | 600 mg qd x 16 days | NA | ↓ 8% (↓ 22-↑ 8%) | ↓ 19% (11-25%) | ↓ 44% (26-58%) |
Simeprevir | 150 mg qd x 14 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 23 | ↓ 51% (↓ 46-↓ 56%) | ↓ 71% (↓ 67-↓ 74%) | ↓ 91% (↓ 88-↓ 92%) |
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvird | 90/400 mg qd x 14 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 15 | ↓34 (↓ 25-↓ 41) | ↓ 34 (↓ 25-↓ 41) | ↓ 34 (¯ 24-↓ 43) |
Ledipasvir | | | | ↔ | ↔ | NA |
Sofosbuvir GS-331007e | | | | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ |
Sofosbuvirf | 400 mg qd single dose | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 16 | ↓ 19 (↓ 40- ↑10) |
↔ | NA |
GS-331007e | | | | ↓ 23 (↓16-↓ 30) | ↓ 16 (↓24-↓ 8) | NA |
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvirg | 400/100 mg qd x 14 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 14 | | | |
Sofosbuvir | | | | ↑38 ( ↑14- ↑ 67) |
↔ | NA |
GS-331007e | | | | ↓14 (↓ 20-↓7) |
↔ |
↔ |
Velpatasvir | | | | ↓ 47 (↓ 57-¯↓36) | ↓ 53 (↓ 61-↓43) | ↓ 57 (↓ 64-↓ 48) |
Azithromycin | 600 mg single dose | 400 mg qd x 7 days | 14 | ↑ 22% (4-42%) | ↔ | NA |
Clarithromycin | 500 mg q12h x 7 days | 400 mg qd x 7 days | 11 | ↓ 26% (15-35%) | ↓ 39% (30-46%) | ↓ 53% (42-63%) |
14-OH metabolite | | | | ↑ 49% (32-69%) | ↑ 34% (18-53%) | ↑ 26% (9-45%) |
Fluconazole | 200 mg x 7 days | 400 mg qd x 7 days | 10 | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ |
Itraconazole | 200 mg q12h x 28 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 18 | ↓ 37% (20-51%) | ↓ 39% (21-53%) | ↓ 44% (27-58%) |
Hydroxy-itraconazole | | | | ↓ 35% (12-52%) | ↓ 37% (14-55%) | ↓ 43% (18-60%) |
Posaconazole | 400 mg (oral suspension) bid x 10 and 20 days | 400 mg qd x 10 and 20 days | 11 | ↓ 45% (34-53%) | ↓ 50% (40-57%) | NA |
Rifabutin | 300 mg qd x 14 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 9 | ↓ 32% (15-46%) | ↓ 38% (28-47%) | ↓ 45% (31-56%) |
Voriconazole | 400 mg po q12h x 1 day, then 200 mg po q12h x 8 days | 400 mg qd x 9 days | NA | ↓ 61%a
| ↓ 77%a
| NA |
| 300 mg po q12h days 2‑7 | 300 mg qd x 7 days | NA | ↓ 36%b
(21-49%) | ↓ 55%b
(45-62%) | NA |
| 400 mg po q12h days 2‑7 | 300 mg qd x 7 days | NA | ↑ 23%b
(↓ 1-↑ 53%) | ↓ 7%b
(↓ 23-↑ 13%) | NA |
Artemether/ lumefantrine | Artemether 20 mg/ lumefantrine 120 mg tablets (6 4-tablet doses over 3 days) | 600 mg qd x 26 days | 12 | | | |
Artemether | | ↓ 21% | ↓ 51% | NA |
dihydroartemisinin | | ↓ 38% | ↓ 46% | NA |
lumefantrine | | ↔ | ↓ 21% | NA |
Atorvastatin | 10 mg qd x 4 days | 600 mg qd x 15 days | 14 | ↓ 14% (1-26%) | ↓ 43% (34-50%) | ↓ 69% (49-81%) |
Total active (including metabolites) | | | | ↓ 15% (2-26%) | ↓ 32% (21-41%) | ↓ 48% (23-64%) |
Pravastatin | 40 mg qd x 4 days | 600 mg qd x 15 days | 13 | ↓ 32% (↓ 59-↑ 12%) | ↓ 44% (26-57%) | ↓ 19% (0-35%) |
Simvastatin | 40 mg qd x 4 days | 600 mg qd x 15 days | 14 | ↓ 72% (63-79%) | ↓ 68% (62-73%) | ↓ 45% (20-62%) |
Total active (including metabolites) | | | | ↓ 68% (55-78%) | ↓ 60% (52-68%) | NAc |
Carbamazepine | 200 mg qd x 3 days, 200 mg bid x 3 days, then 400 mg qd x 29 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 12 | ↓ 20% (15-24%) | ↓ 27% (20-33%) | ↓ 35% (24-44%) |
Epoxide metabolite | | | | ↔ | ↔ | ↓ 13% (↓ 30-↑ 7%) |
Cetirizine | 10 mg single dose | 600 mg qd x 10 days | 11 | ↓ 24% (18-30%) | ↔ | NA |
Diltiazem | 240 mg x 21 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 13 | ↓ 60% (50-68%) | ↓ 69% (55-79%) | ↓ 63% (44-75%) |
Desacetyl diltiazem | | | | ↓ 64% (57-69%) | ↓ 75% (59-84%) | ↓ 62% (44-75%) |
N-monodes-methyl diltiazem | | | | ↓ 28% (7-44%) | ↓ 37% (17-52%) | ↓ 37% (17-52%) |
Ethinyl estradiol/ Norgestimate | 0.035 mg/0.25 mg x 14 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | | | | |
Ethinyl estradiol | | | 21 | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ |
Norelgestromine | | | 21 | ↓ 46% (39-52%) | ↓ 64% (62-67%) | ↓ 82% (79-85%) |
Levonorgestrel | | | 6 | ↓ 80% (77-83%) | ↓ 83% (79-87%) | ↓ 86% (80-90%) |
Lorazepam | 2 mg single dose | 600 mg qd x 10 days | 12 | ↑ 16% (2-32%) | ↔ | NA |
Methadone | Stable maintenance 35‑100 mg daily | 600 mg qd x 14‑21 days | 11 | ↓ 45% (25-59%) | ↓ 52% (33-66%) | NA |
Bupropion | 150 mg single dose (sustained-release) | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 13 | ↓ 34% (21-47%) | ↓ 55% (48-62%) | NA |
Hydroxy-bupropion | | | | ↑ 50% (20-80%) | ↔ | NA |
Paroxetine | 20 mg qd x 14 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 16 | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ |
Sertraline | 50 mg qd x 14 days | 600 mg qd x 14 days | 13 | ↓ 29% (15-40%) | ↓ 39% (27-50%) | ↓ 46% (31-58%) |
↑ Indicates increase ↓ Indicates decrease ↔ Indicates no change or a mean increase or decrease of < 10%.
a 90% CI not available.
b Relative to steady-state administration of voriconazole (400 mg for 1 day, then 200 mg po q12h for 2 days).
c Not available because of insufficient data.
d Study conducted with ATRIPLA®coadministered with HARVONI®.
e Thepredominantcirculatingnucleosidemetabolite of sofosbuvir.
f Study conducted with ATRIPLA coadministered with SOVALDI® (sofosbuvir).
g Study conducted with ATRIPLA coadministered with EPCLUSA®. NA = not available. |
Table 8 Effect of Coadministered Drug on EFV Plasma Cmax, AUC, and Cmin
|
|---|
| Number of Subjects
| EFV (mean % change)
|
|---|
Coadministered Drug
| Dose
| EFV Dose
| Cmax (90% CI)
| AUC (90% CI)
| Cmin (90% CI)
|
|---|
Boceprevir
| 800 mg tid x 6 days
| 600 mg qd x 16 days
| NA
| ↑ 11% (2-20%)
| ↑ 20% (15-26%)
| NA
|
Simeprevir
| 150 mg qd x 14 days
| 600 mg qd x 14 days
| 23
| ↔
| ↓ 10% (5-15%)
| ↓ 13% (7-19%)
|
Azithromycin
| 600 mg single dose
| 400 mg qd x 7 days
| 14
| ↔
| ↔
| ↔
|
Clarithromycin
| 500 mg q12h x 7 days
| 400 mg qd x 7 days
| 12
| ↑ 11% (3-19%)
| ↔
| ↔
|
Fluconazole
| 200 mg x 7 days
| 400 mg qd x 7 days
| 10
| ↔
| ↑ 16% (6-26%)
| ↑ 22% (5-41%)
|
Itraconazole
| 200 mg q12h x 14 days
| 600 mg qd x 28 days
| 16
| ↔
| ↔
| ↔
|
Rifabutin
| 300 mg qd x 14 days
| 600 mg qd x 14 days
| 11
| ↔
| ↔
| ↓ 12% (↓ 24-↑ 1%)
|
Rifampin
| 600 mg x 7 days
| 600 mg qd x 7 days
| 12
| ↓ 20% (11-28%)
| ↓ 26% (15-36%)
| ↓ 32% (15-46%)
|
Voriconazole
| 400 mg po q12h x 1 day, then 200 mg po q12h x 8 days
| 400 mg qd x 9 days
| NA
| ↑ 38%a
| ↑ 44%a
| NA
|
300 mg po q12h days 2-7
| 300 mg qd x 7 days
| NA
| ↓ 14%b
(7-21%)
| ↔b
| NA
|
400 mg po q12h days 2-7
| 300 mg qd x 7 days
| NA
| ↔b
| ↑ 17%b (6-29%)
| NA
|
Artemether/ Lumefantrine
| Artemether 20 mg/ lumefantrine 120 mg tablets (6 4-tablet doses over 3 days)
| 600 mg qd x 26 days
| 12
| ↔
| ↓ 17%
| NA
|
Atorvastatin
| 10 mg qd x 4 days
| 600 mg qd x 15 days
| 14
| ↔
| ↔
| ↔
|
Pravastatin
| 40 mg qd x 4 days
| 600 mg qd x 15 days
| 11
| ↔
| ↔
| ↔
|
Simvastatin
| 40 mg qd x 4 days
| 600 mg qd x 15 days
| 14
| ↓ 12% (↓ 28-↑ 8%)
| ↔
| ↓ 12% (↓ 25-↑ 3%)
|
Aluminum hydroxide 400 mg, magnesium hydroxide 400 mg, plus simethicone 40 mg
| 30 mL single dose
| 400 mg single dose
| 17
| ↔
| ↔
| NA
|
Carbamazepine
| 200 mg qd x 3 days, 200 mg bid x 3 days, then 400 mg qd x 15 days
| 600 mg qd x 35 days
| 14
| ↓ 21% (15-26%)
| ↓ 36% (32-40%)
| ↓ 47% (41-53%)
|
Cetirizine
| 10 mg single dose
| 600 mg qd x 10 days
| 11
| ↔
| ↔
| ↔
|
Diltiazem
| 240 mg x 14 days
| 600 mg qd x 28 days
| 12
| ↑ 16% (6-26%)
| ↑ 11% (5-18%)
| ↑ 13% (1-26%)
|
Famotidine
| 40 mg single dose
| 400 mg single dose
| 17
| ↔
| ↔
| NA
|
Paroxetine
| 20 mg qd x 14 days
| 600 mg qd x 14 days
| 12
| ↔
| ↔
| ↔
|
Sertraline
| 50 mg qd x 14 days
| 600 mg qd x 14 days
| 13
| ↑ 11% (6-16%)
| ↔
| ↔
|
↑ Indicates increase ↓ Indicates decrease ↔ Indicates no change or a mean increase or decrease of < 10%.
a 90% CI not available.
b Relative to steady-state administration of efavirenz (600 mg once daily for 9 days). NA = not available.
|
3TC
Effect of 3TC on the Pharmacokinetics of Other Agents: Based on in vitro study results, 3TC at therapeutic drug exposures is not expected to affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs that are substrates of the following transporters: organic anion transporter polypeptide 1B1/3 (OATP1B1/3), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), P-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1), MATE2-K, organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1), OCT2, or OCT3.
Effect of Other Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of 3TC: 3TC is a substrate of MATE1, MATE2-K, and OCT2 in vitro. Trimethoprim (an inhibitor of these drug transporters) has been shown to increase 3TC plasma concentrations. This interaction is not considered clinically significant as no dose adjustment of 3TC is needed.
3TC is a substrate of P-gp and BCRP; however, considering its absolute bioavailability (87%), it is unlikely that these transporters play a significant role in the absorption of 3TC. Therefore, coadministration of drugs that are inhibitors of these efflux transporters is unlikely to affect the disposition and elimination of 3TC.
Interferon Alfa: There was no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between 3TC and interferon alfa in a trial of 19 healthy male subjects [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9)].
Ribavirin: In vitro data indicate ribavirin reduces phosphorylation of 3TC, stavudine, and zidovudine. However, no pharmacokinetic (e.g., plasma concentrations or intracellular triphosphorylated active metabolite concentrations) or pharmacodynamic (e.g., loss of HIV-1/HCV virologic suppression) interaction was observed when ribavirin and 3TC (n = 18), stavudine (n = 10), or zidovudine (n = 6) were coadministered as part of a multi-drug regimen to HIV-1/HCV co-infected subjects [see Warnings and Precautions (5.9)].
Sorbitol (Excipient): 3TC and sorbitol solutions were coadministered to 16 healthy adult subjects in an open-label, randomized-sequence, 4-period, crossover trial. Each subject received a single 300-mg dose of 3TC oral solution alone or coadministered with a single dose of 3.2 grams, 10.2 grams, or 13.4 grams of sorbitol in solution. Coadministration of 3TC with sorbitol resulted in dose-dependent decreases of 20%, 39%, and 44% in the AUC(0-24), 14%, 32%, and 36% in the AUC(∞), and 28%, 52%, and 55% in the Cmax of 3TC, respectively.
Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole: 3TC and TMP/SMX were coadministered to 14 HIV-1-positive subjects in a single-center, open-label, randomized, crossover trial. Each subject received treatment with a single 300 mg dose of lamivudine and TMP 160 mg/SMX 800 mg once a day for 5 days with concomitant administration of 3TC 300 mg with the fifth dose in a crossover design. Coadministration of TMP/SMX with 3TC resulted in an increase of 43% ± 23% (mean ± SD) in lamivudine AUC∞, a decrease of 29% ± 13% in lamivudine oral clearance, and a decrease of 30% ± 36% in 3TC renal clearance. The pharmacokinetic properties of TMP and SMX were not altered by coadministration with lamivudine. There is no information regarding the effect on 3TC pharmacokinetics of higher doses of TMP/SMX such as those used in treat PCP.
TDF
At concentrations substantially higher (~300-fold) than those observed in vivo, tenofovir did not inhibit in vitro drug metabolism mediated by any of the following human CYP isoforms: CYP3A4, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, or CYP2E1. However, a small (6%) but statistically significant reduction in metabolism of CYP1A substrate was observed. Based on the results of in vitro experiments and the known elimination pathway of tenofovir, the potential for CYP mediated interactions involving TDF with other medicinal products is low.
Table 9 summarizes pharmacokinetic effects of coadministered drug on tenofovir pharmacokinetics. No clinically significant drug interactions have been observed between TDF and ribavirinor sofosbuvir.
Table 9 Drug Interactions: Changes in Pharmacokinetic Parameters for Tenofovira in the Presence of the CoadministeredDrug
Coadministered Drug
| Dose of Coadministered Drug (mg)
| N
| % Change of Tenofovir Pharmacokinetic Parametersb(90% CI)
|
|---|
Cmax
| AUC
| Cmin
|
|---|
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvire,f
| 90/400oncedaily × 10days
| 24
| ↑ 47 (↑ 37 to↑58)
| ↑ 35 (↑ 29 to↑ 42)
| ↑ 47 (↑ 38 to↑57)
|
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvire,g
| 23
| ↑ 64 (↑ 54 to↑74)
| ↑ 50 (↑ 42 to↑59)
| ↑ 59 (↑ 49 to↑70)
|
Ledipasvir/ Sofosbuvirh
| 90/400oncedaily × 14 days
| 15
| ↑ 79 (↑ 56 to↑104)
| ↑ 98 (↑ 77 to↑123)
| ↑ 163 (↑ 132to↑ 197)
|
Sofosbuviri
| 400singledose
| 16
| ↑ 25 (↑8 to ↑ 45)
| ⇔
| ⇔
|
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvirj
| 400/100 once daily
| 24
| ↑ 44 (↑33to↑55)
| ↑ 40 (↑34to↑ 46)
| ↑ 84 (↑76to↑92)
|
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvirk
| 400/100 once daily
| 30
| ↑ 46 (↑39to↑54)
| ↑ 40 (↑34to↑45)
| ↑ 70 (↑61to↑79)
|
Sofosbuvir/ Velpatasvir/ Voxilaprevirl
| 400/100/100 + Voxilaprevirm 100 once daily
| 29
| ↑48 (↑36 to ↑61)
| ↑39 (↑32 to ↑46)
| ↑47 (↑38 to ↑56)
|
Tacrolimus
| 0.05 mg/kg twice daily × 7 days
| 21
| ↑ 13 (↑1 to↑ 27)
| ⇔
| ⇔
|
a Subjects received VIREAD 300 mg once daily.
b Increase = ↑; Decrease = ↓; No Effect = ⇔; NC = Not Calculated
e Data generated from simultaneous dosing with HARVONI (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir). Staggered administration (12 hours apart) provided similar results.
f Comparison based on exposures when administered as atazanavir/ritonavir + FTC/TDF.
g Comparison based on exposures when administered as darunavir/ritonavir + FTC/TDF.
h Study conducted with ATRIPLA(EFV/FTC/TDF) coadministered with HARVONI; coadministration with HARVONI also results in comparable increases in tenofovir exposure when TDF is administered as COMPLERA(FTC/rilpivirine/TDF), or TRUVADA + dolutegravir.
i Study conducted with ATRIPLA coadministered with SOVALDI (sofosbuvir).
j Study conducted with COMPLERAcoadministered with EPCLUSA; coadministration with EPCLUSA also results in comparable increases in tenofovir exposures when TDF is administered as ATRIPLA, STRIBILD (elvitegravir/cobicistat/FTC/TDF), TRUVADA + atazanavir/ritonavir, or TRUVADA + darunavir/ritonavir.
k Administered as raltegravir + FTC/TDF.
l Comparison based on exposures when administered as darunavir/ritonavir + FTC/TDF.
m Study conducted with additional voxilaprevir 100 mg to achieve voxilaprevir exposures expected in HCV-infected patients