Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.
Single Agent:
The data described below reflect exposure to gemcitabine as a single agent administered at doses between 800 mg/m2to 1250 mg/m2intravenously over 30 minutes once weekly in 979 patients with various malignancies. The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions of single agent gemcitabine are nausea/vomiting, anemia, increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), increased aspartate aminotransferase (AST), neutropenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, proteinuria, fever, hematuria, rash, thrombocytopenia, dyspnea, and edema. The most common (≥5%) Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, increased ALT, increased alkaline phosphatase, anemia, increased AST, and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 10% of the 979 patients discontinued gemcitabine for injection due to adverse reactions. Adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine for injection in 2% of 979 patients were cardiovascular adverse reactions (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, arrhythmia, and hypertension) and adverse reactions resulting in discontinuation of gemcitabine for injection in <1% of 979 patients were anemia, thrombocytopenia, hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, nausea/vomiting, fever, rash, dyspnea, hemorrhage, infection, stomatitis, somnolence, flu-like syndrome, and edema.
Tables 5 and 6 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities reported in patients with various malignancies receiving single agent gemcitabine across 5 clinical trials. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions are provided following Table 6.
Table 5 Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥10% of Patients Receiving Single Agent Gemcitabinea
|
|
|
Adverse Reactionsb
| Gemcitabinec
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Nausea and Vomiting
| 69
| 13
| 1
|
Fever
| 41
| 2
| 0
|
Rash
| 30
| <1
| 0
|
Dyspnea
| 23
| 3
| <1
|
Diarrhea
| 19
| 1
| 0
|
Hemorrhage
| 17
| <1
| <1
|
Infection
| 16
| 1
| <1
|
Alopecia
| 15
| <1
| 0
|
Stomatitis
| 11
| <1
| 0
|
Somnolence
| 11
| <1
| <1
|
Paresthesias
| 10
| <1
| 0
|
Table 6: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Single Agent Gemcitabinea
Laboratory Abnormalityb
| Gemcitabinec
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Hematologic
| |
Anemia
| 68
| 7
| 1
|
Neutropenia
| 63
| 19
| 6
|
Thrombocytopenia
| 24
| 4
| 1
|
Hepatic
| |
Increased ALT
| 68
| 8
| 2
|
Increased AST
| 67
| 6
| 2
|
Increased Alkaline Phosphatase
| 55
| 7
| 2
|
Hyperbilirubinemia
| 13
| 2
| <1
|
Renal
| |
Proteinuria
| 45
| <1
| 0
|
Hematuria
| 35
| <1
| 0
|
Increased BUN
| 16
| 0
| 0
|
Increased Creatinine
| 8
| <1
| 0
|
Additional adverse reactions include the following:
- Transfusion requirements: Red blood cell transfusions (19%); platelet transfusions (<1%)
- Edema: Edema (13%), peripheral edema (20%), generalized edema (<1%)
- Flu-like symptoms: Fever, asthenia, anorexia, headache, cough, chills, myalgia, asthenia insomnia, rhinitis, sweating, and/or malaise (19%)
- Infection: Sepsis (<1%)
- Extravasation: Injection-site reactions (4%)
- Allergic: Bronchospasm (<2%); anaphylactoid reactions
Ovarian Cancer
Tables 7 and 8 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with carboplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 1) of gemcitabine with carboplatin (n=175) compared to carboplatin alone (n=174) for the second-line treatment of ovarian cancer in women with disease that had relapsed more than 6 months following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy [see Clinical Studies (14.1)]. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following Table 8.
The proportion of patients with dose adjustments for carboplatin (1.8% versus 3.8%), doses of carboplatin omitted (0.2% versus 0) and discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (11% versus 10%), were similar between arms. Dose adjustment for gemcitabine occurred in 10% of patients and gemcitabine dose was omitted in 14% of patients in the gemticabine/carboplatin arm.
: Table 7.Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1a
|
|
Adverse Reactionsb
| Gemcitabine / Carboplatinc
(N=175)
| Carboplatind
(N=174)
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Nausea
| 69
| 6
| 0
| 61
| 3
| 0
|
Alopecia
| 49
| 0
| 0
| 17
| 0
| 0
|
Vomiting
| 46
| 6
| 0
| 36
| 2
| <1
|
Constipation
| 42
| 6
| 1
| 37
| 3
| 0
|
Fatigue
| 40
| 3
| <1
| 32
| 5
| 0
|
Diarrhea
| 25
| 3
| 0
| 14
| <1
| 0
|
Stomatitis/Pharyngitis
| 22
| <1
| 0
| 13
| 0
| 0
|
Table 8: Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Carboplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Carboplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 1a
|
|
|
Laboratory Abnormalityb
| Gemcitabine/Carboplatin (N=175)
| Carboplatin (N=174)
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Hematologic
|
Neutropenia
| 90
| 42
| 29
| 58
| 11
| 1
|
Anemia
| 86
| 22
| 6
| 75
| 9
| 2
|
Thrombocytopenia
| 78
| 30
| 5
| 57
| 10
| 1
|
RBC Transfusionsc
| 38
| -
| -
| 15
| -
| -
|
Platelet Transfusionsc
| 9
| -
| -
| 3
| -
| -
|
Hematopoietic growth factors were administered more frequently in the gemcitabine-containing arm: leukocyte growth factor (24% and 10%) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (7% and 3.9%).
The following clinically relevant Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the gemcitabine with carboplatin arm: dyspnea (3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic event (2.3% versus 1.1 %), motor neuropathy (1.1% versus 0.6%), and rash/desquamation (0.6% versus 0).
Breast Cancer
Tables 9 and 10 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine for injection-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with paclitaxel arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 2) of gemcitabine with paclitaxel (n=262) compared to paclitaxel alone (n=259) for the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in women who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting or for whom anthracyclines were contraindicated [see Clinical Studies (14.2)]. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions, occurring in <10% of patients, are provided following Table
The requirement for dose reduction of paclitaxel were higher for patients in the gemcitabine/paclitaxel arm (5% versus 2%). The number of paclitaxel doses omitted (<1%), the proportion of patients discontinuing treatment for adverse reactions (7% versus 5%) and the number of treatment-related deaths (1 patient in each arm) were similar between the two arms.
Table 9: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2a $Table Footer a Grade based on National Cancer Institute CTC Version 2.0.b Non-laboratory events were graded only if assessed to be possibly drug-related. $EndTableFooter Adverse Reactionsb
| Gemcitabine /Paclitaxel (N=262)
| Paclitaxel (N=259)
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Alopecia
| 90
| 14
| 4
| 92
| 19
| 3
|
Neuropathy-Sensory
| 64
| 5
| <1
| 58
| 3
| 0
|
Nausea
| 50
| 1
| 0
| 31
| 2
| 0
|
Fatigue
| 40
| 6
| <1
| 28
| 1
| <1
|
Vomiting
| 29
| 2
| 0
| 15
| 2
| 0
|
Diarrhea
| 20
| 3
| 0
| 13
| 2
| 0
|
Anorexia
| 17
| 0
| 0
| 12
| <1
| 0
|
Neuropathy-Motor
| 15
| 2
| <1
| 10
| <1
| 0
|
Stomatitis/Pharyngitis
| 13
| 1
| <1
| 8
| <1
| 0
|
Fever
| 12
| <1
| 0
| 3
| 0
| 0
|
Rash/Desquamation
| 11
| <1
| <1
| 5
| 0
| 0
|
Febrile Neutropenia
| 6
| 5
| <1
| 2
| 1
| 0
|
Table 10: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Paclitaxel and at a Higher Incidence than Patients Receiving Single Agent Paclitaxel [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 2a
|
|
Laboratory Abnormalityb
| Gemcitabine / Paclitaxelc
(N=262)
| Etoposide/ Paclitaxeld
(N=259)
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Hematologic
| |
Anemia
| 69
| 6
| 1
| 51
| 3
| <1
|
Neutropenia
| 69
| 31
| 17
| 31
| 4
| 7
|
Thrombocytopenia
| 26
| 5
| <1
| 7
| <1
| <1
|
Hepatobiliary
| | | | | | |
Increased ALT
| 18
| 5
| <1
| 6
| <1
| 0
|
Increased AST
| 16
| 2
| 0
| 5
| <1
| 0
|
Clinically relevant Grade 3 or 4 dyspnea occurred with a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with paclitaxel arm compared with the paclitaxel arm (1.9% versus 0)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Tables 11 and 12 presents the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 3) of gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=260) administered in 28-day cycles as compared to cisplatin alone (n=262) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [see Clinical Studies (14.3)].
Patients randomized to gemcitabine with cisplatin received a median of 4 cycles of treatment and those randomized to cisplatin alone received a median of 2 cycles of treatment. In this trial, the requirement for dose adjustments (>90% versus 16%), discontinuation of treatment for adverse reactions (15% versus 8%), and the proportion of patients hospitalized (36% versus 23%) were all higher for patients receiving gemcitabine with cisplatin compared to those receiving cisplatin alone. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% versus<1%), sepsis (4% versus 1%), Grade 3 cardiac dysrhythmias (3% versus <1%) were all higher in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm compared to the cisplatin alone arm. The two-drug combination was more myelosuppressive with 4 (1.5%) possibly treatment-related deaths, including 3 resulting from myelosuppression with infection and one case of renal failure associated with pancytopenia and infection. No deaths due to treatment were reported on the cisplatin arm.
Table 11: Selected Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥10% Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 3a
|
|
|
|
Adverse Reactionsb
| Gemcitabine/Cisplatinc
| Cisplatind
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Nausea
| 93
| 25
| 2
| 87
| 20
| <1
|
Vomiting
| 78
| 11
| 12
| 71
| 10
| 9
|
Alopecia
| 53
| 1
| 0
| 33
| 0
| 0
|
Neuro Motor
| 35
| 12
| 0
| 15
| 3
| 0
|
Diarrhea
| 24
| 2
| 2
| 13
| 0
| 0
|
Neuro Sensory
| 23
| 1
| 0
| 18
| 1
| 0
|
Infection
| 18
| 3
| 2
| 12
| 1
| 0
|
Fever
| 16
| 0
| 0
| 5
| 0
| 0
|
Neuro Cortical
| 16
| 3
| 1
| 9
| 1
| 0
|
Neuro Mood
| 16
| 1
| 0
| 10
| 1
| 0
|
Local
| 15
| 0
| 0
| 6
| 0
| 0
|
Neuro Headache
| 14
| 0
| 0
| 7
| 0
| 0
|
Stomatitis
| 14
| 1
| 0
| 5
| 0
| 0
|
Hemorrhage
| 14
| 1
| 0
| 4
| 0
| 0
|
Hypotension
| 12
| 1
| 0
| 7
| 1
| 0
|
Rash
| 11
| 0
| 0
| 3
| 0
| 0
|
Table 12: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in >10% of Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin and at Higher Incidence than in Patients Receiving Single Agent Cisplatin [Between Arm Difference of ≥5% (All Grades) or ≥2% (Grades 3-4)] in Study 3a
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory Abnormalityb
| Gemcitabine / Cisplatinc
| Cisplatind
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Hematologic
|
Anemia
| 89
| 22
| 3
| 67
| 6
| 1
|
Thrombocytopenia
| 85
| 25
| 25
| 13
| 3
| 1
|
Neutropenia
| 79
| 22
| 35
| 20
| 3
| 1
|
Lymphopenia
| 75
| 25
| 18
| 51
| 12
| 5
|
RBC Transfusionse
| 39
| -
| -
| 13
| -
| -
|
Platelet Transfusionse
| 21
| -
| -
| <1
| -
| -
|
Hepatic
|
Increased Transaminases
| 22
| 2
| 1
| 10
| 1
| 0
|
Increased Alkaline Phosphatase
| 19
| 1
| 0
| 13
| 0
| 0
|
Renal
|
Increased Creatinine
| 38
| 4
| <1
| 31
| 2
| <1
|
Proteinuria
| 23
| 0
| 0
| 18
| 0
| 0
|
Hematuria
| 15
| 0
| 0
| 13
| 0
| 0
|
Other Laboratory
|
Hyperglycemia
| 30
| 4
| 0
| 23
| 3
| 0
|
Hypomagnesemia
| 30
| 4
| 3
| 17
| 2
| 0
|
Hypocalcemia
| 18
| 2
| 0
| 7
| 0
| <1
|
Tables 13 and 14 present the incidence of selected adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, occurring in ≥10% of gemcitabine-treated patients and at a higher incidence in the gemcitabine with cisplatin arm, reported in a randomized trial (Study 4) of gemcitabine with cisplatin (n=69) administered in 21-day cycles as compared to etoposide with cisplatin (n=66) in patients receiving first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC [see Clinical Studies (14.3)]. Additional clinically significant adverse reactions are provided following Table 14.
Patients in the gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) arm received a median of 5 cycles and those in the etoposide/cisplatin (EC) arm received a median of 4 cycles. The majority of patients receiving more than one cycle of treatment required dose adjustments; 81% in the GC arm and 68% in the EC arm. The incidence of hospitalizations for adverse reactions was 22% in the GC arm and 27% in the EC arm. The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment for adverse reactions was higher in the GC arm (14% versus 8%). The proportion of patients who were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia was lower in the GC arm (7% versus 12%). There was one death attributed to treatment, a patient with febrile neutropenia and renal failure, which occurred in the GC arm.
Table 13: Selected Adverse Reactions in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4a
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse Reactionsb
| Gemcitabine/Cisplatinc
| Etoposide/Cisplatind
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Nausea and Vomiting
| 96
| 35
| 4
| 86
| 19
| 7
|
Alopecia
| 77
| 13
| 0
| 92
| 51
| 0
|
Paresthesias
| 38
| 0
| 0
| 16
| 2
| 0
|
Infection
| 28
| 3
| 1
| 21
| 8
| 0
|
Stomatitis
| 20
| 4
| 0
| 18
| 2
| 0
|
Diarrhea
| 14
| 1
| 1
| 13
| 0
| 2
|
Edemae
| 12
| -
| -
| 2
| -
| -
|
Rash
| 10
| 0
| 0
| 3
| 0
| 0
|
Hemorrhage
| 9
| 0
| 3
| 3
| 0
| 3
|
Fever
| 6
| 0
| 0
| 3
| 0
| 0
|
Somnolence
| 3
| 0
| 0
| 3
| 2
| 0
|
Flu-like Syndromee
| 3
| -
| -
| 0
| -
| -
|
Dyspnea
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 3
| 0
| 0
|
Table 14: Selected Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in Patients Receiving Gemcitabine with Cisplatin in Study 4a
|
|
|
|
|
Laboratory Abnormalityb
| Gemcitabine /Cisplatinc
| Etoposide/Cisplatind
|
All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
| All Grades (%)
| Grade 3 (%)
| Grade 4 (%)
|
Hematologic
| |
Anemia
| 88
| 22
| 0
| 77
| 13
| 2
|
Neutropenia
| 88
| 36
| 28
| 87
| 20
| 56
|
Thrombocytopenia
| 81
| 39
| 16
| 45
| 8
| 5
|
RBC Transfusionsc
| 29
| -
| -
| 21
| -
| -
|
Platelet Transfusionse
| 3
| -
| -
| 8
| -
| -
|
Hepatic
|
Increased Alkaline Phosphatase
| 16
| 0
| 0
| 11
| 0
| 0
|
Increased ALT
| 6
| 0
| 0
| 12
| 0
| 0
|
Increased AST
| 3
| 0
| 0
| 11
| 0
| 0
|
Renal
|
Hematuria
| 22
| 0
| 0
| 10
| 0
| 0
|
Proteinuria
| 12
| 0
| 0
| 5
| 0
| 0
|
Increased BUN
| 6
| 0
| 0
| 4
| 0
| 0
|
Increased Creatinine
| 2
| 0
| 0
| 2
| 0
| 0
|
Hematopoietic growth factors were administered more frequently in the gemcitabine-containing arm: leukocyte growth factor (24% and 10%) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (7% and 3.9%).
The following clinically relevant Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions occurred more frequently in the gemcitabine with carboplatin arm: dyspnea (3.4% versus 2.9%), febrile neutropenia (1.1% versus 0), hemorrhagic event (2.3% versus 1.1%), motor neuropathy (1.1% versus 0.6%), and rash/desquamation (0.6% versus 0).