ZERBAXA - Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS LLC

Manufacturer
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS LLC
Effective date
2026-05-12
Label type
HUMAN PRESCRIPTION DRUG LABEL
Version
23
Source
full-release
Hydrated at
2026-05-31 22:21:36

Label at a glance#

ProductZERBAXA
Active ingredientceftolozane sulfate, tazobactam sodium
Label structure16 sections

Indications and uses

ZERBAXA used in combination with metronidazole is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients (at least 32 weeks gestational age) with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) caused by the following susceptible Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms: Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacteroide...

Dosage and administration

The recommended dosage of ZERBAXA in adult patients is 1.5 gram (g) (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) for cIAI and cUTI and 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) for HABP/VABP administered every 8 hours by intravenous infusion over 1 hour. As shown in Table 1, guide the duration of therapy by the severity and site of infection and the patient’s clinical and bacteriological progress. For the treatment of cI...

Storage and handling

ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane and tazobactam) for injection is supplied in single-dose vials containing ceftolozane 1 g (equivalent to 1.147 g of ceftolozane sulfate) and tazobactam 0.5 g (equivalent to 0.537 g of tazobactam sodium) per vial. Vials are supplied in cartons containing 10 vials. (NDC 67919-030-01) ZERBAXA vials should be stored refrigerated at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) and protected from light. Storage ...

Label contents#

Full prescribing information#

1 INDICATIONS AND USAGE

INDICATIONS & USAGE SECTION

1.1 Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

ZERBAXA used in combination with metronidazole is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients (at least 32 weeks gestational age) with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) caused by the following susceptible Gram-negative and Gram-positive microorganisms: Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacteroides fragilis, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus constellatus, and Streptococcus salivarius.

1.2 Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Pyelonephritis

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

ZERBAXA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients (at least 32 weeks gestational age) with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including pyelonephritis, caused by the following susceptible Gram-negative microorganisms: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

1.3 Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

ZERBAXA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients (at least 32 weeks gestational age) with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), caused by the following susceptible Gram-negative microorganisms: Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Serratia marcescens.

1.4 Usage to Reduce Development of Drug-Resistant Bacteria

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of ZERBAXA and other antibacterial drugs, ZERBAXA should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy. In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy.

2 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION

DOSAGE & ADMINISTRATION SECTION

2.5 Preparation of Solutions

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

ZERBAXA does not contain a bacteriostatic preservative. Aseptic technique must be followed in preparing the infusion solution.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Preparation of doses:

Constitute each vial of ZERBAXA with 10 mL of sterile water for injection or 0.9% Sodium Chloride for Injection, USP and gently shake to dissolve. The final volume is approximately 11.4 mL per vial. Caution: The constituted solution is not for direct injection.

To prepare the required dose, withdraw the appropriate volume determined from Table 4 from the reconstituted vial(s). Add the withdrawn volume to an infusion bag containing 100 mL of 0.9% Sodium Chloride for Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP. For doses above 1.5 g, reconstitute a second vial in the same manner as the first one, withdraw an appropriate volume (per Table 5), and add to the same infusion bag. Discard unused portion.

Table 5: Preparation of Doses
ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) DoseVolume to Withdraw from Reconstituted Vial(s)
ZERBAXA 3 g (2 g and 1 g) Two vials of 11.4 mL each (entire contents from two vials)
ZERBAXA 2.25 g (1.5 g and 0.75 g) 11.4 mL from one vial (entire contents) and 5.7 mL from a second vial
ZERBAXA 1.5 g (1 g and 0.5 g)11.4 mL (entire contents from one vial)
ZERBAXA 750 mg (500 mg and 250 mg)5.7 mL
ZERBAXA 450 mg (300 mg and 150 mg)3.5 mL
ZERBAXA 375 mg (250 mg and 125 mg)2.9 mL
ZERBAXA 150 mg (100 mg and 50 mg)1.2 mL

Inspect drug products visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to use. ZERBAXA infusions range from clear, colorless solutions to solutions that are clear and slightly yellow. Variations in color within this range do not affect the potency of the product.

2.6 Compatibility

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Compatibility of ZERBAXA with other drugs has not been established. ZERBAXA should not be mixed with other drugs or physically added to solutions containing other drugs.

2.7 Storage of Constituted Solutions

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Upon constitution with sterile water for injection or 0.9% sodium chloride injection, reconstituted ZERBAXA solution may be held for 1 hour prior to transfer and dilution in a suitable infusion bag.

Following dilution of the solution with 0.9% sodium chloride or 5% dextrose, ZERBAXA is stable for 24 hours when stored at room temperature or 7 days when stored under refrigeration at 2 C to 8°C (36 F to 46°F). Discard unused portion.

Constituted ZERBAXA solution or diluted ZERBAXA infusion should not be frozen.

3 DOSAGE FORMS AND STRENGTHS

DOSAGE FORMS & STRENGTHS SECTION

ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane and tazobactam) for injection is supplied as a white to yellow sterile powder for reconstitution in single-dose vials; each vial contains ceftolozane 1 g (equivalent to 1.147 g of ceftolozane sulfate) and tazobactam 0.5 g (equivalent to 0.537 g of tazobactam sodium).

4 CONTRAINDICATIONS

CONTRAINDICATIONS SECTION

ZERBAXA is contraindicated in patients with known serious hypersensitivity to the components of ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam), piperacillin/tazobactam, or other members of the beta-lactam class.

5 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS SECTION

5.1 Decreased Efficacy in Patients with Baseline Creatinine Clearance of 30 to 50 mL/min

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

In a subgroup analysis of a Phase 3 cIAI trial of adult patients, clinical cure rates were lower in patients with baseline CrCl of 30 to 50 mL/min compared to those with CrCl greater than 50 mL/min (Table 6). The reduction in clinical cure rates was more marked in the ZERBAXA plus metronidazole arm compared to the meropenem arm. A similar trend was also seen in the cUTI trial. Monitor CrCl at least daily in patients with changing renal function and adjust the dosage of ZERBAXA accordingly [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

Table 6: Clinical Cure Rates in a Phase 3 Trial of Adult cIAI Patients by Baseline Renal Function (MITT Population)
Baseline Renal FunctionZERBAXA plus Metronidazole
n/N (%)
Meropenem
n/N (%)
CrCl greater than 50 mL/min312/366 (85.2)355/404 (87.9)
CrCl 30 to 50 mL/min11/23 (47.8)9/13 (69.2)

5.2 Hypersensitivity Reactions

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Serious and occasionally fatal hypersensitivity (anaphylactic) reactions have been reported in patients receiving beta-lactam antibacterial drugs.

Before initiating therapy with ZERBAXA, make careful inquiry about previous hypersensitivity reactions to other cephalosporins, penicillins, or other beta-lactams. If this product is to be given to a patient with a cephalosporin, penicillin, or other beta-lactam allergy, exercise caution because cross sensitivity has been established. If an anaphylactic reaction to ZERBAXA occurs, discontinue the drug and institute appropriate therapy.

5.3 Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrhea

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been reported for nearly all systemic antibacterial agents, including ZERBAXA, and may range in severity from mild diarrhea to fatal colitis. Treatment with antibacterial agents alters the normal flora of the colon and may permit overgrowth of C. difficile.

C. difficile produces toxins A and B which contribute to the development of CDAD. CDAD must be considered in all patients who present with diarrhea following antibacterial use. Careful medical history is necessary because CDAD has been reported to occur more than 2 months after the administration of antibacterial agents.

If CDAD is confirmed, discontinue antibacterials not directed against C. difficile, if possible. Manage fluid and electrolyte levels as appropriate, supplement protein intake, monitor antibacterial treatment of C. difficile, and institute surgical evaluation as clinically indicated.

5.4 Development of Drug-resistant Bacteria

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Prescribing ZERBAXA in the absence of a proven or strongly suspected bacterial infection or a prophylactic indication is unlikely to provide benefit to the patient and risks the development of drug-resistant bacteria.

6 ADVERSE REACTIONS

ADVERSE REACTIONS SECTION

The following serious reactions are described in greater detail in the Warnings and Precautions section:

6.1 Clinical Trials Experience

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and also may not reflect rates observed in practice.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Adult Patients

Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections and Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Pyelonephritis

ZERBAXA was evaluated in Phase 3 comparator-controlled clinical trials of cIAI (Trial 1) and cUTI (Trial 2), which included a total of 1015 patients treated with ZERBAXA (1.5 g every 8 hours, adjusted based on renal function where appropriate) and 1032 patients treated with comparator (levofloxacin 750 mg daily in cUTI or meropenem 1 g every 8 hours in cIAI) for up to 14 days. The mean age of treated patients was 48 to 50 years (range 18 to 92 years), across treatment arms and indications. In both indications, about 25% of the subjects were 65 years of age or older. Most patients (75%) enrolled in the cUTI trial were female, and most patients (58%) enrolled in the cIAI trial were male. Most patients (>70%) in both trials were enrolled in Eastern Europe and were White.

The most common adverse reactions (5% or greater in either indication) occurring in patients receiving ZERBAXA were nausea, diarrhea, headache, and pyrexia. Table 7 lists adverse reactions occurring in 1% or greater of patients receiving ZERBAXA in Phase 3 cIAI and cUTI clinical trials.

Table 7: Adverse Reactions Occurring in 1% or Greater of Adult Patients Receiving ZERBAXA in Phase 3 cIAI and cUTI Clinical Trials (Trial 1 and Trial 2)
Adverse ReactionComplicated Intra-abdominal InfectionsComplicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Pyelonephritis
ZERBAXA*
(N=482)
n (%)
Meropenem
(N=497)
n (%)
ZERBAXA*
(N=533)
n (%)
Levofloxacin
(N=535)
n (%)
Nausea38 (7.9)29 (5.8)15 (2.8)9 (1.7)
Headache12 (2.5)9 (1.8)31 (5.8)26 (4.9)
Diarrhea30 (6.2)25 (5)10 (1.9)23 (4.3)
Pyrexia27 (5.6)20 (4)9 (1.7)5 (0.9)
Constipation9 (1.9)6 (1.2)21 (3.9)17 (3.2)
Insomnia17 (3.5)11 (2.2)7 (1.3)14 (2.6)
Vomiting16 (3.3)20 (4)6 (1.1)6 (1.1)
Hypokalemia16 (3.3)10 (2)4 (0.8)2 (0.4)
ALT increased7 (1.5)5 (1)9 (1.7)5 (0.9)
AST increased5 (1)3 (0.6)9 (1.7)5 (0.9)
Anemia7 (1.5)5 (1)2 (0.4)5 (0.9)
Thrombocytosis9 (1.9)5 (1)2 (0.4)2 (0.4)
Abdominal pain6 (1.2)2 (0.4)4 (0.8)2 (0.4)
Anxiety9 (1.9)7 (1.4)1 (0.2)4 (0.7)
Dizziness4 (0.8)5 (1)6 (1.1)1 (0.2)
Hypotension8 (1.7)4 (0.8)2 (0.4)1 (0.2)
Atrial fibrillation6 (1.2)3 (0.6)1 (0.2)0
Rash8 (1.7)7 (1.4)5 (0.9)2 (0.4)

* The ZERBAXA for injection dose was 1.5 g intravenously every 8 hours, adjusted to match renal function where appropriate. In the cIAI trials, ZERBAXA was given in conjunction with metronidazole.

Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 2.0% (20/1015) of patients receiving ZERBAXA and 1.9% (20/1032) of patients receiving comparator drugs. Renal impairment (including the terms renal impairment, renal failure, and renal failure acute) led to discontinuation of treatment in 5/1015 (0.5%) subjects receiving ZERBAXA and none in the comparator arms.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Increased Mortality

In the cIAI trials (Phase 2 and 3), death occurred in 2.5% (14/564) of patients receiving ZERBAXA and in 1.5% (8/536) of patients receiving meropenem. The causes of death varied and included worsening and/or complications of infection, surgery, and underlying conditions.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Less Common Adverse Reactions in Phase 3 cIAI and cUTI Clinical Trials

The following selected adverse reactions were reported in ZERBAXA-treated subjects at a rate of less than 1%:

  • Cardiac disorders: tachycardia, angina pectoris
  • Gastrointestinal disorders: gastritis, abdominal distension, dyspepsia, flatulence, ileus paralytic
  • General disorders and administration site conditions: infusion site reactions
  • Infections and infestations: candidiasis including oropharyngeal and vulvovaginal, fungal urinary tract infection
  • Investigations: increased serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), increased serum alkaline phosphatase, positive Coombs’ test
  • Metabolism and nutrition disorders: hyperglycemia, hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatemia
  • Nervous system disorders: ischemic stroke
  • Renal and urinary system: renal impairment, renal failure
  • Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders: dyspnea
  • Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: urticaria
  • Vascular disorders: venous thrombosis
SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia

ZERBAXA was evaluated in a Phase 3 comparator-controlled clinical trial for HABP/VABP (Trial 3), which included a total of 361 patients treated with ZERBAXA (3 g every 8 hours, adjusted based on renal function where appropriate) and 359 patients treated with comparator (meropenem 1 g every 8 hours) for up to 14 days. The mean age of treated patients was 60 years (range 18 to 98 years), across treatment arms. About 44% of the subjects were 65 years of age or older. Most patients (71%) enrolled in the trial were male. All subjects were mechanically ventilated at randomization and 92% were in an intensive care unit (ICU) at randomization. The median APACHE II score was 17, and 33% of subjects had a baseline APACHE II score of ≥20, indicating a high severity of illness for many patients enrolled in this trial.

Table 8 lists adverse reactions occurring in 2% or greater of patients receiving ZERBAXA in a Phase 3 HABP/VABP clinical trial.

Table 8: Adverse Reactions Occurring in 2% or Greater of Adult Patients Receiving ZERBAXA in a Phase 3 HABP/VABP Clinical Trial (Trial 3)
Adverse ReactionsZERBAXA*
N=361
n (%)
Meropenem
N=359
n (%)
Hepatic transaminase increased† 43 (11.9)26 (7.2)
Renal impairment/renal failure‡ 32 (8.9)22 (6.1)
Diarrhea23 (6.4)25 (7.0)
Intracranial hemorrhage§ 16 (4.4)5 (1.4)
Vomiting12 (3.3)10 (2.8)
Clostridioides difficile colitis 10 (2.8)2 (0.6)

* The ZERBAXA for injection dose was 3 g intravenously every 8 hours, adjusted to match renal function where appropriate.

† Includes alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased, hepatic enzyme increased, hypertransaminasemia, liver function test abnormal.

‡ Includes acute renal failure, anuria, azotemia, oliguria, prerenal failure, renal failure, renal impairment.

§ Includes cerebellar hemorrhage, cerebral hematoma, cerebral hemorrhage, hemorrhage intracranial, hemorrhagic stroke, hemorrhagic transformation stroke, intraventricular hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma.

Includes Clostridioides difficile colitis, Clostridioides difficile infection, Clostridioides test positive.

Treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions occurred in 1.1% (4/361) of patients receiving ZERBAXA and 1.4% (5/359) of patients receiving meropenem.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Less Common Adverse Reactions in a Phase 3 HABP/VABP Clinical Trial

The following selected adverse reactions were reported in ZERBAXA-treated subjects at a rate of less than 2%:

  • Investigations: blood alkaline phosphatase increased, gamma-glutamyltransferase increased, Coombs direct test positive

Pediatric Patients

Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections and Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Pyelonephritis

ZERBAXA was evaluated in two blinded, randomized, active-controlled clinical studies in pediatric patients from birth to less than 18 years of age, one in cIAI (Trial 4) and the other in cUTI (Trial 5), which included a total of 170 pediatric patients treated with ZERBAXA and 54 pediatric patients treated with the comparator. The ZERBAXA dosing regimen was the same in each trial [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)]. Patients were randomized 3:1 to receive ZERBAXA plus metronidazole or meropenem plus placebo in the cIAI study and ZERBAXA or meropenem in the cUTI study [see Clinical Studies (14.1, 14.2)]. In these pediatric patients, the type of adverse reactions were generally comparable to those observed in adults. Table 9 lists adverse reactions occurring in 4% or greater of pediatric patients receiving ZERBAXA in either the pediatric cIAI or cUTI clinical trial.

Table 9: Adverse Reactions Occurring in 4% or Greater of Pediatric Patients (birth to less than 18 years of age) Receiving ZERBAXA in either the cIAI or cUTI Clinical Trials (Trial 4 and Trial 5)
Adverse ReactionComplicated Intra-abdominal InfectionsComplicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Pyelonephritis
ZERBAXA*
(N=70)
n (%)
Meropenem
(N=21)
n (%)
ZERBAXA
(N=100)
n (%)
Meropenem
(N=33)
n (%)
Thrombocytosis† 11 (16)3 (14)9 (9)3 (9)
Diarrhea12 (17)5 (24)7 (7)3 (9)
Pyrexia‡ 9 (13)3 (14)7 (7)1 (3)
Leukopenia§ 3 (4)0 (0)8 (8)0 (0)
Abdominal pain 8 (11)0 (0)2 (2)1 (3)
AST increased5 (7) 1 (5) 4 (4) 2 (6)
Vomiting 7 (10) 1 (5) 1 (1) 1 (3)
ALT increased 4 (6) 1 (5) 4 (4) 2 (6)
Anemia 5 (7) 0 (0) 2 (2) 0 (0)
Phlebitis# 4 (6) 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (3)
Hypertension 3(4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (3)
Gastritis 3 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Hypokalemia ♠ 3 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Bradypnea ♥ , 3 (4) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

* In the cIAI trials, ZERBAXA was given in conjunction with metronidazole.

† Includes platelet count increased.

‡ Includes hyperthermia.

§ Includes neutropenia and neutrophil count decreased.

Includes upper abdominal pain.

# Includes superficial phlebitis.

♠ Includes blood potassium decreased.

♥ Includes respiratory rate decreased.

Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia

The safety of ZERBAXA was evaluated in an open-label, non-comparative, multicenter clinical study in pediatric patients from 33 weeks post-menstrual age to less than 18 years of age diagnosed with HABP/VABP (NCT04223752; Trial 6). A total of 40 pediatric patients ranging from 10 days of age up to 16 years and 7 months of age were enrolled in the study and received ZERBAXA 60 mg/kg (ceftolozane 40 mg/kg and tazobactam 20 mg/kg) every 8 hours, up to a maximum dose of 3 g, intravenously over 1 hour for a duration of 8 to 14 days [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)]. The safety profile of ZERBAXA in pediatric patients with HABP/VABP was similar to that in pediatric patients with cIAI and cUTI and adult patients with HABP/VABP. The most common adverse reactions that occurred in greater than 7% of pediatric patients included thrombocytosis, pyrexia, increased AST and ALT, anemia, diarrhea, and leukopenia.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Laboratory Values

The development of a positive direct Coombs test may occur during treatment with ZERBAXA. The incidence of seroconversion to a positive direct Coombs test was 0.2% in patients receiving ZERBAXA and 0% in patients receiving the comparator in the adult cUTI and cIAI clinical trials. The incidence of seroconversion to a positive direct Coombs test was 31.2% in patients receiving ZERBAXA and 3.6% in patients receiving meropenem in the adult HABP/VABP clinical trial. The incidence of seroconversion to a positive direct Coombs test was 45.3% in patients receiving ZERBAXA and 33.3% in patients receiving meropenem in the pediatric cIAI clinical trial. The incidence of seroconversion to a positive direct Coombs test was 29.7% in patients receiving ZERBAXA and 8.7% in patients receiving meropenem in the pediatric cUTI clinical trial. In clinical trials, there was no evidence of hemolysis in patients who developed a positive direct Coombs test in any treatment group.

8 USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS

USE IN SPECIFIC POPULATIONS SECTION

8.1 Pregnancy

PREGNANCY SECTION

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Risk Summary

There are no data available on ZERBAXA, ceftolozane or tazobactam use in pregnant women to allow assessment of a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Available data from published prospective cohort studies, case series, and case reports over several decades have not identified an association of cephalosporin use during pregnancy with major birth defects, miscarriage, or other adverse maternal or fetal outcomes (see Data). Neither ceftolozane nor tazobactam produced embryo-fetal toxicity when administered to rodents during the period of organogenesis at ceftolozane doses approximately 3.5 times higher in mice and 2 times higher in rats than the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 2 grams every 8 hours based on plasma AUC comparison or at tazobactam doses approximately 10 times higher in rats than the MRHD of 1 gram every 8 hours based on body surface area comparison. In pre-postnatal studies, where pregnant rats were administered intravenous ceftolozane or intraperitoneal tazobactam in gestation and through the lactation period, ceftolozane was associated with a decrease in auditory startle response in first generation offspring at a dose lower than the MRHD based on AUC comparison, and tazobactam was associated with reduced maternal body weight gain and increased stillbirths at a dose equivalent to approximately 4 times the MRHD and reduced fetal body weights in first generation offspring at a dose approximately equivalent to the MRHD based on body surface area comparison (see Data).

The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 to 4% and 15 to 20%, respectively.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Data

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Human Data

While available studies with multiple cephalosporins cannot definitively establish the absence of risk, published data from prospective cohort studies, case series, and case reports over several decades have not identified an association of cephalosporin use during pregnancy with major birth defects, miscarriage, or other adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Available studies have methodologic limitations, including small sample size, retrospective data collection, and inconsistent comparator groups.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Animal Data

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Ceftolozane

Embryo-fetal development studies were performed in mice administered intravenous ceftolozane at doses of 300, 1000, and 2000 mg/kg/day during the period of organogenesis (Gestation Day 6 through 15) and in rats administered intravenous ceftolozane in doses of 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day during the period of organogenesis (Gestation Day 6 through 17). In mice, ceftolozane was not associated with maternal or embryo-fetal toxicity with doses up to the highest dose of 2000 mg/kg/ day (approximately 3.5 times the MRHD of 2 grams every 8 hours based on plasma AUC comparison). In rats, no embryo-fetal toxicity was observed, but maternal body weight gain was reduced at a ceftolozane dose of 1000 mg/kg/day. No adverse maternal effects in rats were observed at a dose of 300 mg/kg/day and no adverse embryo-fetal effects were observed at a dose of 1000 mg/kg/day (respectively equivalent to approximately 0.7- and 2-times the MRHD based on plasma AUC comparison).

In a pre-postnatal study in rats, intravenous ceftolozane administered during pregnancy and lactation (Gestation Day 6 through Lactation Day 20) was associated with a decrease in auditory startle response in postnatal Day 60 male pups at maternal doses greater than or equal to 300 mg/kg/day. No adverse effects were observed in rats at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day, a dose lower than the MRHD of 2 grams every 8 hours based on plasma AUC comparison.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Tazobactam

In an embryo-fetal study in rats, tazobactam was administered intravenously during the period of organogenesis (Gestation Day 7 through 17) at doses of 125, 500, and 3000 mg/kg/day. The high dose of 3000 mg/kg/day produced maternal toxicity (decreased food consumption and body weight gain) but was not associated with fetal toxicity. No adverse maternal effects were observed at a dose of 500 mg/kg/day and no adverse fetal effects were observed at a dose of 3000 mg/kg/day (respectively equivalent to approximately 2- and 10-times the MRHD of 1 gram every 8 hours based on body surface area comparison). In rats, tazobactam was shown to cross the placenta. Concentrations in the fetus were less than or equal to 10% of those found in maternal plasma.

In a pre-postnatal study in rats, tazobactam administered intraperitoneally in doses of 40, 320, and 1280 mg/kg/day at the end of gestation and during lactation (Gestation Day 17 through Lactation Day 21) was associated with decreased maternal food consumption and body weight gain at the end of gestation and significantly more stillbirths at the high dose of 1280 mg/kg/day. No effects on the physical development, neurological function, or fertility and reproductive ability of first generation (F1) pups were noted, but postnatal body weights for F1 pups delivered to dams receiving 320 and 1280 mg/kg/day tazobactam were significantly reduced 21 days after delivery. The second generation (F2) fetuses were normal for all doses of tazobactam. No adverse effects on maternal reproduction were observed at doses up to 320 mg/kg/day and F1 body weights were not reduced at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day (respectively equivalent to approximately 1.0 and 0.1 times the MRHD of 1 gram every 8 hours based on body surface area comparison).

8.2 Lactation

LACTATION SECTION

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Risk Summary

There are no data on the presence of ceftolozane or tazobactam in human milk. There are no data on the effects of tazobactam or ceftolozane on the breastfed infant, or the effects on milk production.

The developmental and health benefits of breastfeeding should be considered along with the mother's clinical need for ZERBAXA and any potential adverse effects on the breastfed child from ZERBAXA or from the underlying maternal conditions.

8.4 Pediatric Use

PEDIATRIC USE SECTION

The safety and effectiveness of ZERBAXA for the treatment of cIAI, cUTI, and HABP/VABP have been established in pediatric patients at least 32 weeks gestational age and older. Use of ZERBAXA in this age group is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled trials of ZERBAXA in adults with additional pharmacokinetic and safety data from trials in pediatric patients with cUTI, cIAI, and HABP/VABP [see Adverse Reactions (6.1), Clinical Pharmacology (12.3), and Clinical Studies (14)].

The safety profile of ZERBAXA in pediatric patients was similar to adults with cIAI, cUTI, and HABP/VABP treated with ZERBAXA [see Adverse Reactions (6.1)].

See Table 4 for recommended dosage in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with renal impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.4)]. There is insufficient information to establish dosing for pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age with renal impairment [see Dosage and Administration (2.4) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

The safety and effectiveness of ZERBAXA have not been established in pediatric patients less than 32 weeks gestational age.

ZERBAXA is not recommended in pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age with renal impairment [see Use in Specific Populations (8.6) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

8.5 Geriatric Use

GERIATRIC USE SECTION

Of the 1015 patients treated with ZERBAXA in the Phase 3 cIAI and cUTI clinical trials, 250 (24.6%) were 65 years or older, including 113 (11.1%) 75 years or older. The incidence of adverse events in both treatment groups was higher in older subjects (65 years or older) in the trials for both indications. In the cIAI trial, cure rates in the elderly (aged 65 years and older) in the ZERBAXA plus metronidazole arm were 69/100 (69%) and in the comparator arm were 70/85 (82.4%). This finding in the elderly population was not observed in the cUTI trial.

Of the 361 patients treated with ZERBAXA in the Phase 3 HABP/VABP clinical trial, 160 (44.3%) were 65 years or older, including 83 (23%) 75 years or older. The incidence of adverse events in both treatment groups was higher in older subjects (65 years or older). In the trial, Day 28 all-cause mortality rates in the elderly (aged 65 years and older) were comparable between treatment arms:50/160 (31.3%) in the ZERBAXA arm and 54/160 (33.8%) in the comparator arm.

ZERBAXA is substantially excreted by the kidney and the risk of adverse reactions to ZERBAXA may be greater in patients with renal impairment. Because elderly patients are more likely to have decreased renal function, care should be taken in dose selection, and it may be useful to monitor renal function. Adjust dosage for elderly patients based on renal function [see Dosage and Administration (2.2) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

8.6 Renal Impairment

RENAL IMPAIRMENT SUBSECTION

Adult Patients

See Table 3 for recommended dosage in adult patients with a CrCl less than 90 mL/min or CrCl less than 15 mL/min and receiving intermittent hemodialysis. Dosage is not established for adult patients with a CrCl <15 mL/min who are not receiving intermittent hemodialysis. [see Dosage and Administration (2.3), Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

Pediatric Patients

See Table 4 for recommended dosage in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with an eGFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73 m2 or eGFR less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and receiving intermittent hemodialysis. Dosage is not established for pediatric patients with an eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73m2 who are not receiving intermittent hemodialysis. There is insufficient information to recommend dosage adjustment for pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age with renal impairment. [See Dosage and Administration (2.4) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3)].

10 OVERDOSAGE

OVERDOSAGE SECTION

In the event of overdose, discontinue ZERBAXA and provide general supportive treatment. ZERBAXA can be removed by intermittent hemodialysis. Approximately 66% of ceftolozane, 56% of tazobactam, and 51% of the tazobactam metabolite M1 were removed by dialysis. No information is available on the use of intermittent hemodialysis to treat overdosage.

11 DESCRIPTION

DESCRIPTION SECTION

ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) is an antibacterial combination product consisting of the cephalosporin antibacterial drug ceftolozane sulfate and the beta-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam sodium for intravenous administration.

Ceftolozane sulfate is a semi-synthetic antibacterial drug of the beta-lactam class for parenteral administration. The chemical name of ceftolozane sulfate is 1H-Pyrazolium, 5-amino-4-[[[(2-aminoethyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]-2-[[(6R,7R)-7-[[(2Z)-2-(5-amino-1,2,4-thiadiazol-3-yl)-2-[(1-carboxy-1-methylethoxy)imino]acetyl]amino]-2-carboxy-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-en-3-yl]methyl]-1-methyl-,sulfate (1:1). The molecular formula is C23H31N12O8S2 +∙HSO4 - and the molecular weight is 764.77.

Figure 1: Chemical structure of ceftolozane sulfate

Figure 1Figure 1

Tazobactam sodium, a derivative of the penicillin nucleus, is a penicillanic acid sulfone. Its chemical name is sodium (2S,3S,5R)-3-methyl-7-oxo-3-(1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-ylmethyl)-4-thia-1-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptane-2-carboxylate-4,4-dioxide. The chemical formula is C10H11N4NaO5S and the molecular weight is 322.3.

Figure 2: Chemical structure of tazobactam sodium

Figure 2Figure 2

ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane and tazobactam) for injection is a white to yellow sterile powder for reconstitution consisting of ceftolozane 1 g (equivalent to 1.147 g of ceftolozane sulfate) and tazobactam 0.5 g (equivalent to 0.537 g of tazobactam sodium) per vial, packaged in single-dose glass vials. The product contains sodium chloride (487 mg/vial) as a stabilizing agent, citric acid (21 mg/vial), and L-arginine (approximately 600 mg/vial) as excipients.

12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY SECTION

12.2 Pharmacodynamics

PHARMACODYNAMICS SECTION

As with other beta-lactam antibacterial agents, the percent time of dosing interval that the plasma concentration of ceftolozane exceeds the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the infecting organism has been shown to be the best predictor of efficacy in animal models of infection. The percent time of dosing interval that the plasma concentration of tazobactam exceeds a threshold concentration has been determined to be the parameter that best predicts the efficacy of tazobactam in in vitro and in vivo models. The exposure-response analyses in efficacy and safety clinical trials for cIAI, cUTI, and HABP/VABP support the recommended dose regimens of ZERBAXA.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Cardiac Electrophysiology

In a randomized, positive and placebo-controlled crossover thorough QTc study, 51 healthy subjects were administered a single therapeutic dose of ZERBAXA 1.5 gram (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) and a supratherapeutic dose of ZERBAXA 4.5 gram (ceftolozane 3 g and tazobactam 1.5 g). No significant effects of ZERBAXA on heart rate, electrocardiogram morphology, PR, QRS, or QT interval were detected.

12.3 Pharmacokinetics

PHARMACOKINETICS SECTION

Ceftolozane and tazobactam pharmacokinetics are similar following single- and multiple-dose administrations. The Cmax and AUC of ceftolozane and tazobactam increase in proportion to dose.

The mean steady-state population pharmacokinetic parameters of ZERBAXA in patients with cIAI and cUTI receiving 1-hour intravenous infusions of ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) or patients with HABP/VABP receiving 1-hour intravenous infusions of ZERBAXA 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) every 8 hours are summarized in Table 10.

Table 10: Mean (SD) Steady-State Plasma Population Pharmacokinetic Parameters of ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) after Multiple Intravenous 1-hour Infusions of ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) or 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) Every 8 Hours in Adult Patients with CrCl Greater than 50 mL/min
PK parametersZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) in cIAI and cUTI PatientsZERBAXA 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) in HABP/VABP Patients
Ceftolozane
(n=317)
Tazobactam
(n=244)
Ceftolozane
(n=247)
Tazobactam
(n=247)
Cmax (mcg/mL)65.7 (27)17.8 (9)105 (46)26.4 (13)
AUC0-8,ss (mcg∙h/mL)186 (74)35.8 (57)392 (236)73.3 (76)
SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Distribution

The binding of ceftolozane and tazobactam to human plasma proteins is approximately 16% to 21% and 30%, respectively. The mean (CV%) steady-state volume of distribution of ZERBAXA in healthy adult males (n = 51) following a single intravenous dose of ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) was 13.5 L (21%) and 18.2 L (25%) for ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively, similar to extracellular fluid volume.

Following 1-hour intravenous infusions of ZERBAXA 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) or adjusted based on renal function every 8 hours in ventilated patients with confirmed or suspected pneumonia (N=22), mean pulmonary epithelial lining fluid-to-free plasma AUC ratios of ceftolozane and tazobactam were approximately 50% and 62%, respectively, and are similar to those in healthy subjects (approximately 61% and 63%, respectively) receiving ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g). Minimum ceftolozane and tazobactam epithelial lung lining fluid concentrations in ventilated subjects at the end of the dosing interval were 8.2 mcg/mL and 1.0 mcg/mL, respectively.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Elimination

Ceftolozane is eliminated from the body by renal excretion with a mean half-life of approximately 3 to 4 hours. Tazobactam is eliminated by renal excretion and metabolism with a plasma mean half-life of approximately 2 to 3 hours. The elimination half-life (t1/2) of ceftolozane or tazobactam is independent of dose.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Metabolism

Ceftolozane does not appear to be metabolized to any appreciable extent and is not a substrate for CYP enzymes. The beta-lactam ring of tazobactam is hydrolyzed to form the pharmacologically inactive tazobactam metabolite M1.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Excretion

Ceftolozane, tazobactam and the tazobactam metabolite M1 are excreted by the kidneys. Following administration of a single ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) intravenous dose to healthy male adults, greater than 95% of ceftolozane was excreted in the urine as unchanged parent drug. More than 80% of tazobactam was excreted as the parent compound with the remainder excreted as the tazobactam M1 metabolite. After a single dose of ZERBAXA, renal clearance of ceftolozane (3.41 – 6.69 L/h) was similar to plasma CL (4.10 to 6.73 L/h) and similar to the glomerular filtration rate for the unbound fraction, suggesting that ceftolozane is eliminated by the kidney via glomerular filtration. Tazobactam is a substrate for OAT1 and OAT3 transporters and its elimination has been shown to be inhibited by probenecid, an inhibitor of OAT1/3.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Specific Populations

Dose adjustment is not warranted on the basis of age (18 years and older), gender, or race/ethnicity. No significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane and tazobactam were observed based on age (18 years and older), gender, weight, or race/ethnicity.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Adult Patients with Renal Impairment

The ceftolozane dose normalized geometric mean AUC increased up to 1.26-fold, 2.5-fold, and 5-fold in subjects with CrCl 80-51 mL/min, 50-30 mL/min, and 29-15 mL/min, respectively, compared to healthy subjects with normal renal function. The respective tazobactam dose normalized geometric mean AUC increased approximately up to 1.3-fold, 2-fold, and 4-fold. In subjects with CrCl less than 15 mL/min on intermittent hemodialysis, approximately two-thirds of the administered ZERBAXA dose is removed by intermittent hemodialysis.

For ZERBAXA dosage recommendation in adult patients with renal impairment refer to Table 3 [see Dosage and Administration (2.3)]. Dosage is not established for adult patients with a CrCl less than 15 mL/min who are not receiving intermittent hemodialysis.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Patients with Augmented Renal Function

Following a single 1-hour intravenous infusion of ZERBAXA 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) to critically-ill patients with CrCl greater than or equal to 180 mL/min (N=10), mean terminal half-life values of ceftolozane and tazobactam were 2.6 hours and 1.5 hours, respectively. No dose adjustment of ZERBAXA is recommended for HABP/VABP patients with augmented renal function [see Clinical Studies (14.3)].

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Patients with Hepatic Impairment

As ZERBAXA does not undergo hepatic metabolism, the systemic clearance of ZERBAXA is not expected to be affected by hepatic impairment.

No dose adjustment is recommended for ZERBAXA in subjects with hepatic impairment.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Geriatric Patients

In a population pharmacokinetic analysis of ZERBAXA, no clinically relevant differences in exposure were observed with regard to age.

No dose adjustment of ZERBAXA based on age is recommended. Dosage adjustment for ZERBAXA in geriatric patients should be based on renal function [see Dosage and Administration (2.3)].

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Pediatric Patients

Pediatric Patients with cIAI and cUTI

The pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane and tazobactam in patients 23 days to 17 years and 7 months old were evaluated from 3 clinical studies: patients with proven or suspected gram-negative infection, cIAI, and cUTI. Ceftolozane exposures were numerically higher in pediatric patients with cUTI compared to pediatric patients with cIAI, however, such a difference was not observed for tazobactam (Table 11 and Table 12) [see Clinical Studies (14.2)].

In patients with cIAI (Table 11) and cUTI (Table 12) total body clearance of both ceftolozane and tazobactam increases with age, with values in adolescents approaching those in the adult population. Whereas elimination half-life tends to decrease with a decrease of age. While ceftolozane exposures in pediatric patients with cIAI and cUTI overlap with the range of exposures seen in adults, in general they are lower than mean exposures in adults. Tazobactam exposures are comparable between pediatric and adult patients except for patients aged birth to <3 months (Group 5) with cUTI, who had higher exposures.

Population pharmacokinetic analyses and target attainment simulations in pediatric patients with cIAI and cUTI demonstrated that the recommended pediatric dosage for patients from birth to less than 18 years without renal impairment result in no clinically relevant differences in systemic exposure to those in adult patients given ZERBAXA 1.5 grams.

Table 11: Steady-State Plasma Population Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Mean and SD) of ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) in Pediatric cIAI Patients*
Patient CharacteristicsGroup 1
(12 to <18 years)
Group 2
(6 to <12 years)
Group 3
(2 to <6 years)
AUC0-8, area under the curve in the dosing interval 0 to 8 hours at steady-state; Ceoi, concentration at the end of infusion; CL, elimination clearance; SD, standard deviation; t1/2, terminal half-life; Vss, steady-state volume of distribution.
N=16N=30N=20
Ceftolozane
AUC0-8 (mcg•h/mL)123 (46)116 (30)98.8 (26)
Ceoi (mcg/mL)51.1 (21)53.7 (18)42.4 (13)
t1/2 (hr)2.2 (0.4)1.8 (0.2)1.7 (0.3)
Vss (L) 23.0 (14.6)11.5 (5.7)7.4 (3.2)
Clearance (L/h) 9.55 (4.70)5.81 (2.15)3.58 (1.12)
Tazobactam
AUC0-8 (mcg•h/mL)31.7 (16)30.1 (7)23.4 (6)
Ceoi (mcg/mL)21.7 (10)21.4 (6)16.9 (6)
t1/2 (hr)1.3 (0.2)1.1 (0.2)1.0 (0.2)
Vss (L) 18.8 (10.7)10.6 (6.2)7.1 (4.0)
Clearance (L/h)18.87 (7.54)11.02 (4.06)7.62 (2.40)

* One patient was enrolled in Group 4 in the C/T arm but discontinued before the day of PK sample collection; one participant was enrolled for Group 5 in the C/T arm with steady-state ceftolozane PK parameter values: AUC0-8=173 mcg*h/mL; Ceoi=43.4 mcg/mL; and with tazobactam PK parameter values: AUC0-8=69.9 mcg*h/mL; Ceoi=30.5 mcg/mL.

Table 12: Steady-State Plasma Population Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Mean and SD) of ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) in Pediatric cUTI Patients
Patient CharacteristicsGroup 1
(12 to <18 years)
Group 2
(6 to <12 years)
Group 3
(2 to <6 years)
Group 4
(3 months to <2 years)
Group 5
(Birth to <3 months)
AUC0-8, area under the curve in the dosing interval 0 to 8 hours at steady-state; Ceoi, concentration at the end of infusion; CL, elimination clearance; SD, standard deviation; t1/2, terminal half-life; VSS, steady-state volume of distribution.
N=14N=19N=20N=22N=14
Ceftolozane
AUC0-8 (mcg•h/mL)177 (65) 145 (54) 133 (49) 129 (57) 144 (39)
Ceoi (mcg/mL) 68.7 (21)60.8 (20) 60.3 (24) 50.3 (20) 43.1 (12)
t1/2 (hr) 2.3 (0.4) 2.0 (0.6) 1.8 (0.4) 2.0 (0.7) 2.7 (0.6)
Vss (L) 15.8 (5.5) 10.7 (5.2) 5.4 (2.1) 3.7 (2.5) 2.5 (1.0)
Clearance (L/h) 6.31 (2.17) 4.84 (2.18) 2.59 (0.69) 1.53 (0.64) 0.75 (0.34)
Tazobactam
AUC0-8 (mcg•h/mL) 35.0 (12) 26.7 (10) 26.6 (8) 28.6 (13) 44.6 (15)
Ceoi (mcg/mL) 22.9 (8) 19.2 (7) 19.9 (7) 18.9 (8) 25.9 (10)
t1/2 (hr) 1.3 (0.5) 1.2 (0.4) 1.0 (0.3) 1.1 (0.4) 1.2 (0.7)
Vss (L) 16.0 (6.6) 10.6 (8.2) 5.1 (2.7) 3.7 (3.4) 1.5 (0.8)
Clearance (L/h) 15.67 (4.49) 12.83 (5.39)6.37 (2.02) 3.53 (1.71) 1.32 (0.81)

For ZERBAXA dosage recommendation in pediatric cIAI and cUTI patients, refer to Table 2 [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

Pediatric Patients with HABP/VABP

The pharmacokinetics of ceftolozane and tazobactam were evaluated in Trial 6 in pediatric patients 10 days to 16 years and 7 months of age with HABP/VABP. Patients 12 to less than 18 years of age received ZERBAXA 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) and patients at least 33 weeks post-menstrual age to less than 12 years of age received ZERBAXA 60 mg/kg (ceftolozane 40 mg/kg and tazobactam 20 mg/kg) intravenously over 1 hour for a minimum of 8 days. At the recommended dosage, the mean population pharmacokinetic parameters after multiple dose administration of ceftolozane and tazobactam in pediatric patients at least 35 weeks post-menstrual age to less than 18 years of age with HABP/VABP enrolled into 5 age groups are shown in Table 13 [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)].

In patients with HABP/VABP, total body clearance of both ceftolozane and tazobactam increased with age, with values in pediatric patients aged 12 years to younger than 17 years of age approaching those in the adult population, whereas elimination half-life tended to decrease with a decrease of age. With the recommended dosage, both ceftolozane and tazobactam exposures overlapped with the range of exposures seen in adults [see Dosage and Administration (2.2, 2.4)].

Table 13: Steady-State Plasma Population Pharmacokinetic Parameters (Mean and SD) of ZERBAXA (ceftolozane and tazobactam) in Pediatric HABP/VABP Patients
Patient CharacteristicsGroup 1 (12 to <18 years)Group 2 (7 to <12 years)Group 3 (2 to <7 years)Group 4 (3 months to <2 years)Group 5 (Birth to <3 months)*
C max, maximum serum concentration; AUC0-8, area under the curve in the dosing interval 0 to 8 hours at steady-state; t1/2, terminal half-life; VSS, steady-state volume of distribution.
N=8N=7N=7N=10N=7
Ceftolozane
Cmax (mcg/mL)77.6 (12)86.0 (17)78.2 (11)73.9 (16)83.7 (14)
AUC0-8 (mcg•h/mL)235 (39)251 (62)220 (43)258 (103)350 (101)
t1/2 (hr)1.8 (0.2)1.7 (0.2)1.5 (0.3)2.2 (0.8)3.1 (0.9)
Vss (L)17.9 (3.8)11.4 (6.0)4.9 (0.7)2.8 (1.0)1.7 (0.5)
Clearance (L/h)8.53 (1.66)5.92 (2.68)3.10 (0.84)1.24 (0.65)0.44 (0.17)
Tazobactam
Cmax (mcg/mL)13.1 (2)17.2 (6)14.2 (4)15.6 (6)18.8 (5)
AUC0-8 (mcg•h/mL)29.3 (5)40.5 (17)31.8 (9)41.1 (24)55.2 (27)
t1/2 (hr)1.7 (0.1)1.7 (0.3)1.4 (0.1)1.7 (0.5)2.1 (0.7)
Vss (L)27.4 (7.3)18.1 (9.7)7.7 (1.6)4.5 (1.6)2.5 (0.7)
Clearance (L/h)34.09 (6.09)19.17 (8.05)11.26 (4.37)4.39 (2.76)1.50 (0.62)

* Includes pediatric patients at least 35 weeks post-menstrual age.

Pediatric Patients with Renal Impairment

The exposures of ZERBAXA at the recommended dosages [see Dosage and Administration (2.4)] in pediatric patients aged 2 years and older with an eGFR less than 90 mL/min/1.73m2 or eGFR less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and receiving intermittent hemodialysis were predicted to be similar to adult patients. There is insufficient information to assess the exposure of ZERBAXA in pediatric patients less than 2 years of age with renal impairment. For ZERBAXA dosage recommendation in pediatric patients aged 2 years of age and older with renal impairment refer to Table 4 [see Dosage and Administration (2.4)]. Dosage is not established for pediatric patients with an eGFR less than 15 mL/min who are not receiving intermittent hemodialysis.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Drug Interactions

No drug-drug interaction was observed between ceftolozane and tazobactam in a clinical study in 16 healthy subjects. In vitro and in vivo data indicate that ZERBAXA is unlikely to cause clinically relevant drug-drug interactions related to CYPs and transporters at therapeutic concentrations.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Drug Metabolizing Enzymes

In vivo data indicated that ZERBAXA is not a substrate for CYPs. Thus, clinically relevant drug-drug interactions involving inhibition or induction of CYPs by other drugs are unlikely to occur.

In vitro studies demonstrated that ceftolozane, tazobactam and the M1 metabolite of tazobactam did not inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or CYP3A4 and did not induce CYP1A2, CYP2B6, or CYP3A4 at therapeutic plasma concentrations. In vitro induction studies in primary human hepatocytes demonstrated that ceftolozane, tazobactam, and the tazobactam metabolite M1 decreased CYP1A2 and CYP2B6 enzyme activity and mRNA levels in primary human hepatocytes as well as CYP3A4 mRNA levels at supratherapeutic plasma concentrations. Tazobactam metabolite M1 also decreased CYP3A4 activity at supratherapeutic plasma concentrations. A clinical drug-drug interaction study was conducted and results indicated drug interactions involving CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 inhibition by ZERBAXA are not anticipated.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Membrane Transporters

Ceftolozane and tazobactam were not substrates for P-gp or BCRP, and tazobactam was not a substrate for OCT2, in vitro at therapeutic concentrations.

Tazobactam is a known substrate for OAT1 and OAT3. Co-administration of tazobactam with the OAT1/OAT3 inhibitor probenecid has been shown to prolong the half-life of tazobactam by 71%. Co-administration of ZERBAXA with drugs that inhibit OAT1 and/or OAT3 may increase tazobactam plasma concentrations.

In vitro data indicate that ceftolozane did not inhibit P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1, OCT2, MRP, BSEP, OAT1, OAT3, MATE1, or MATE2-K in vitro at therapeutic plasma concentrations.

In vitro data indicate that neither tazobactam nor the tazobactam metabolite M1 inhibit P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1, OCT2, or BSEP transporters at therapeutic plasma concentrations. In vitro, tazobactam inhibited human OAT1 and OAT3 transporters with IC50 values of 118 and 147 mcg/mL, respectively. A clinical drug-drug interaction study was conducted and results indicated clinically relevant drug interactions involving OAT1/OAT3 inhibition by ZERBAXA are not anticipated.

12.4 Microbiology

MICROBIOLOGY SECTION

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Mechanism of Action

Ceftolozane belongs to the cephalosporin class of antibacterial drugs. The bactericidal action of ceftolozane results from inhibition of cell wall biosynthesis, and is mediated through binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). Ceftolozane is an inhibitor of PBPs of P. aeruginosa (e.g., PBP1b, PBP1c, and PBP3) and E. coli (e.g., PBP3).

Tazobactam sodium has little clinically relevant in vitro activity against bacteria due to its reduced affinity to penicillin-binding proteins. It is an irreversible inhibitor of some beta-lactamases (e.g., certain penicillinases and cephalosporinases), and can bind covalently to some chromosomal and plasmid-mediated bacterial beta-lactamases.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Resistance

Mechanisms of beta-lactam resistance may include the production of beta-lactamases, modification of PBPs by gene acquisition or target alteration, up-regulation of efflux pumps, and loss of outer membrane porin.

Clinical isolates may produce multiple beta-lactamases, express varying levels of beta-lactamases, or have amino acid sequence variations, and other resistance mechanisms that have not been identified.

Culture and susceptibility information and local epidemiology should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy.

ZERBAXA demonstrated in vitro activity against Enterobacterales in the presence of some extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and other beta-lactamases of the following groups: TEM, SHV, CTX-M, and OXA. ZERBAXA is not active against bacteria that produce serine carbapenemases [K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)], and metallo-beta-lactamases.

In ZERBAXA clinical trials, some isolates of Enterobacterales with minimum inhibitory concentration to ZERBAXA of ≤2 mcg/mL produced beta-lactamases. These isolates produced one or more beta-lactamases of the following enzyme groups: CTX-M, OXA, TEM, or SHV.

Some of these beta-lactamases were also produced by isolates of Enterobacterales with minimum inhibitory concentration to ZERBAXA >2 mcg/mL.

ZERBAXA demonstrated in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates tested that had chromosomal AmpC, loss of outer membrane porin (OprD), or up regulation of efflux pumps (MexXY, MexAB).

Isolates resistant to other cephalosporins may be susceptible to ZERBAXA, although cross-resistance may occur.

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Interaction with Other Antimicrobials

In vitro synergy studies suggest no antagonism between ZERBAXA and other antibacterial drugs (e.g., meropenem, amikacin, aztreonam, levofloxacin, tigecycline, rifampin, linezolid, daptomycin, vancomycin, and metronidazole).

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Antimicrobial Activity

ZERBAXA has been shown to be active against the following bacteria, both in vitro and in clinical infections [see Indications and Usage (1)] .

Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

Gram-negative bacteria:

  • Enterobacter cloacae
    Escherichia coli
    Klebsiella oxytoca
    Klebsiella pneumoniae
    Proteus mirabilis
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Gram-positive bacteria:

  • Streptococcus anginosus
    Streptococcus constellatus
    Streptococcus salivarius

Anaerobic bacteria:

  • Bacteroides fragilis

Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Pyelonephritis

Gram-negative bacteria:

  • Escherichia coli
    Klebsiella pneumoniae
    Proteus mirabilis
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP/VABP)

Gram-negative bacteria:

  • Enterobacter cloacae
    Escherichia coli
    Haemophilus influenzae
    Klebsiella oxytoca
    Klebsiella pneumoniae
    Proteus mirabilis
    Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Serratia marcescens

The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance is unknown. At least 90 percent of the following bacteria exhibit an in vitro minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) less than or equal to the susceptible breakpoint for ceftolozane and tazobactam against isolates of similar genus or organism group. However, the efficacy of ZERBAXA in treating clinical infections due to these bacteria has not been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.

Gram-negative bacteria:

  • Citrobacter koseri
    Klebsiella aerogenes
    Morganella morganii
    Proteus vulgaris
    Providencia rettgeri
    Providencia stuartii
    Serratia liquefaciens

Gram-positive bacteria:

  • Streptococcus agalactiae
    Streptococcus intermedius
SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Susceptibility Testing

For specific information regarding susceptibility test interpretive criteria and associated test methods and quality control standards recognized by FDA for ceftolozane and tazobactam, please see:
www.fda.gov/STIC .

13 NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY

NONCLINICAL TOXICOLOGY SECTION

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility

CARCINOGENESIS & MUTAGENESIS & IMPAIRMENT OF FERTILITY SECTION

Long-term carcinogenicity studies in animals have not been conducted with ZERBAXA, ceftolozane, or tazobactam.

ZERBAXA was negative for genotoxicity in an in vitro mouse lymphoma assay and an in vivo rat bone-marrow micronucleus assay. In an in vitro chromosomal aberration assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells, ZERBAXA was positive for structural aberrations.

Ceftolozane was negative for genotoxicity in an in vitro microbial mutagenicity (Ames) assay, an in vitro chromosomal aberration assay in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells, an in vitro mouse lymphoma assay, an in vitro HPRT assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells, an in vivo mouse micronucleus assay, and an in vivo unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) assay.

Tazobactam was negative for genotoxicity in an in vitro microbial mutagenicity (Ames) assay, an in vitro chromosomal aberration assay in Chinese hamster lung cells, an in vitro mammalian point-mutation (Chinese hamster ovary cell HPRT) assay, an in vivo mouse bone-marrow micronucleus assay, and an in vivo UDS assay.

Ceftolozane was administered in a fertility study at intravenous doses of 100, 300, and 1000 mg/kg/day to male rats for 28 days before mating and through the mating period and to female rats for 14 days before mating, through the mating period, and until the 7th day of gestation. Ceftolozane had no adverse effect on fertility in male or female rats at doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day (approximately 1.4 times the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 2 grams every 8 hours based on AUC comparison).

In a rat fertility study, intraperitoneal tazobactam doses of 40, 160, and 640 mg/kg/day were administered twice-daily to male rats beginning 70 days before mating and through the mating period, and to female rats beginning 14 days before mating, during the mating period, and until Gestation Day 21. Male and female fertility parameters were not affected at doses less than or equal to 640 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times the MRHD of 1 gram every 8 hours based on body surface comparison).

14 CLINICAL STUDIES

CLINICAL STUDIES SECTION

14.1 Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Adult Patients

A total of 979 adults hospitalized with cIAI were randomized and received study medications in a multinational, double-blind study comparing ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) intravenously every 8 hours plus metronidazole (500 mg intravenously every 8 hours) to meropenem (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) for 4 to 14 days of therapy (NCT01445678; Trial 1). Complicated intra-abdominal infections included appendicitis, cholecystitis, diverticulitis, gastric/duodenal perforation, perforation of the intestine, and other causes of intra-abdominal abscesses and peritonitis. The majority of patients (75%) were from Eastern Europe; 6.3% were from the United States.

The primary efficacy endpoint was clinical response, defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit which occurred 24 to 32 days after the first dose of study drug. The primary efficacy analysis population was the microbiological intent-to-treat (MITT) population, which included all patients who had at least 1 baseline intra-abdominal pathogen regardless of the susceptibility to study drug. The key secondary efficacy endpoint was clinical response at the TOC visit in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population, which included all protocol-adherent MITT patients.

The MITT population consisted of 806 patients; the median age was 52 years and 57.8% were male. The most common diagnosis was appendiceal perforation or peri-appendiceal abscess, occurring in 47% of patients. Diffuse peritonitis at baseline was present in 34.2% of patients.

ZERBAXA plus metronidazole was non-inferior to meropenem with regard to clinical cure rates at the TOC visit in the MITT population. Clinical cure rates at the TOC visit are displayed by patient population in Table 14. Clinical cure rates at the TOC visit by pathogen in the MITT population are presented in Table 15.

Table 14: Clinical Cure Rates in a Phase 3 Trial of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (Trial 1)
Analysis PopulationZERBAXA plus Metronidazole*
n/N (%)
Meropenem†
n/N (%)
Treatment Difference
(95% CI)‡

MITT

323/389 (83)364/417 (87.3)-4.3 (-9.2, 0.7)
ME259/275 (94.2)304/321 (94.7)-0.5 (-4.5, 3.2)

* ZERBAXA 1.5 g intravenously every 8 hours + metronidazole 500 mg intravenously every 8 hours

† 1 gram intravenously every 8 hours

‡ The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated as an unstratified Wilson Score CI.

Table 15: Clinical Cure Rates by Pathogen in a Phase 3 Trial of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (Trial 1; MITT Population)
Organism Group PathogenZERBAXA plus Metronidazole
n/N (%)
Meropenem
n/N (%)
Aerobic Gram-negative
Escherichia coli216/255 (84.7)238/270 (88.1)
Klebsiella pneumoniae31/41 (75.6)27/35 (77.1)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa30/38 (79)30/34 (88.2)
Enterobacter cloacae21/26 (80.8)24/25 (96)
Klebsiella oxytoca14/16 (87.5)24/25 (96)
Proteus mirabilis11/12 (91.7)9/10 (90)
Aerobic Gram-positive
Streptococcus anginosus26/36 (72.2)24/27 (88.9)
Streptococcus constellatus18/24 (75)20/25 (80)
Streptococcus salivarius9/11 (81.8)9/11 (81.8)
Anaerobic Gram-negative
Bacteroides fragilis42/47 (89.4)59/64 (92.2)
Bacteroides ovatus38/45 (84.4)44/46 (95.7)
Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron21/25 (84)40/46 (87)
Bacteroides vulgatus12/15 (80)24/26 (92.3)

In a subset of the E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from both arms of the cIAI Phase 3 trial that met pre-specified criteria for beta-lactam susceptibility, genotypic testing identified certain ESBL groups (e.g., TEM, SHV, CTX-M, OXA) in 53/601 (9%). Cure rates in this subset were similar to the overall trial results. In vitro susceptibility testing showed that some of these isolates were susceptible to ZERBAXA (MIC ≤2 mcg/mL), while some others were not susceptible (MIC >2 mcg/mL). Isolates of a specific genotype were seen in patients who were deemed to be either successes or failures.

Pediatric Patients

The pediatric cIAI trial was a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active controlled trial conducted in hospitalized patients from at least 33 weeks post-menstrual age to less than 18 years (NCT03217136; Trial 4). Patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to either intravenous (IV) ZERBAXA [see Dosage and Administration (2.2)] plus metronidazole (10 mg/kg IV every 8 hours), or meropenem (20 mg/kg IV every 8 hours) plus placebo. Patients received IV study treatment for a minimum of 3 days before an optional switch to oral step-down therapy at the discretion of the investigator to complete a total of 5 to 14 days of antibacterial therapy.

The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population consisted of 91 patients (N=70 in the ZERBAXA plus metronidazole group; N=21 in the meropenem plus placebo group) who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment. The median age of patients was 8.2 years and 8.5 years in the ZERBAXA plus metronidazole and meropenem plus placebo groups, respectively. In the ZERBAXA plus metronidazole group, enrollment by age group was as follows: 12 to <18 y: n=16, 6 to <12 y: n=30, 2 to <6 y: n=22, 3 months to <2 y: n=1, birth to <3 months: n=1. Patients treated with ZERBAXA plus metronidazole were predominantly male (67%) and White (87%). Patients treated with meropenem plus placebo were predominantly female (71%) and White (91%). Most patients in the MITT population had a diagnosis of complicated appendicitis at baseline (ZERBAXA plus metronidazole: 91.4%; meropenem plus placebo: 100%). The median (range) duration of IV study treatment was comparable between patients in the ZERBAXA plus metronidazole (6.3 [0.3 to 14.0] days) and meropenem plus placebo (6.0 [2.3 to 8.8] days) groups.

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ZERBAXA. Efficacy assessments were not powered for formal hypothesis testing of between-treatment group comparisons. At the TOC visit, which occurred 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug, a favorable clinical response was defined as complete resolution or marked improvement in signs and symptoms of the cIAI or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms such that no further antibiotic therapy (IV or oral) or surgical or drainage procedure was required for treatment of the cIAI. A summary of clinical response rates in the MITT and clinically evaluable (CE) populations at the TOC visit are presented in Table 16. The CE included all protocol adherent MITT patients with a clinical outcome at the visit of interest.

Table 16: Clinical Response Rates in a Pediatric Study of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections (Trial 4)
Analysis PopulationZERBAXA plus metronidazole
n/N (%)
Meropenem
n/N (%)
Treatment Difference
(95% CI)*
MITT Population56/70 (80.0)21/21 (100.0)-19.1 (-30.2, -2.9)
CE Population52/58 (89.7)19/19 (100.0)-10.7 (-21.5, 6.8)

* The Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by age group with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights was used.

14.2 Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, Including Pyelonephritis

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Adult Patients

A total of 1068 adults hospitalized with cUTI (including pyelonephritis) were randomized and received study medications in a multinational, double-blind study comparing ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane 1 g and tazobactam 0.5 g) intravenously every 8 hours to levofloxacin (750 mg intravenously once daily) for 7 days of therapy (NCT01345929; Trial 2). The primary efficacy endpoint was defined as complete resolution or marked improvement of the clinical symptoms and microbiological eradication (all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥105 were reduced to <104 CFU/mL) at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit 7 (± 2) days after the last dose of study drug. The primary efficacy analysis population was the microbiologically modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population, which included all patients who received study medication and had at least 1 baseline uropathogen. The key secondary efficacy endpoint was the composite microbiological and clinical cure response at the TOC visit in the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population, which included protocol-adherent mMITT patients with a urine culture at the TOC visit.

The mMITT population consisted of 800 patients with cUTI, including 656 (82%) with pyelonephritis. The median age was 50.5 years and 74% were female. Concomitant bacteremia was identified in 62 (7.8%) patients at baseline; 608 (76%) patients were enrolled in Eastern Europe and 14 (1.8%) patients were enrolled in the United States.

ZERBAXA demonstrated efficacy with regard to the composite endpoint of microbiological and clinical cure at the TOC visit in both the mMITT and ME populations (Table 17). Composite microbiological and clinical cure rates at the TOC visit by pathogen in the mMITT population are presented in Table 18.

In the mMITT population, the composite cure rate in ZERBAXA-treated patients with concurrent bacteremia at baseline was 23/29 (79.3%).

Although a statistically significant difference was observed in the ZERBAXA arm compared to the levofloxacin arm with respect to the primary endpoint, it was likely attributable to the 212/800 (26.5%) patients with baseline organisms non-susceptible to levofloxacin. Among patients infected with a levofloxacin-susceptible organism at baseline, the response rates were similar (Table 17).

Table 17: Composite Microbiological and Clinical Cure Rates in a Phase 3 Trial of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (Trial 2)
Analysis PopulationZERBAXA*
n/N (%)
Levofloxacin†
n/N (%)
Treatment Difference
(95% CI)‡
mMITT306/398 (76.9)275/402 (68.4)8.5 (2.3, 14.6)
  Levofloxacin resistant baseline pathogen(s)60/100 (60)44/112 (39.3)
  No levofloxacin resistant baseline pathogen(s)246/298 (82.6)231/290 (79.7)
ME284/341 (83.3)266/353 (75.4)8.0 (2.0, 14.0)

* ZERBAXA 1.5 g intravenously every 8 hours

† 750 mg intravenously once daily

‡ The 95% confidence interval was based on the stratified Newcombe method.

Table 18: Composite Microbiological and Clinical Cure Rates in a Phase 3 Trial of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections, in Subgroups Defined by Baseline Pathogen (Trial 2; mMITT Population)
PathogenZERBAXA
n/N (%)
Levofloxacin
n/N (%)
Escherichia coli247/305 (81)228/324 (70.4)
Klebsiella pneumoniae22/33 (66.7)12/25 (48)
Proteus mirabilis11/12 (91.7)6/12 (50)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa6/8 (75)7/15 (46.7)

In a subset of the E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from both arms of the cUTI Phase 3 trial that met pre-specified criteria for beta-lactam susceptibility, genotypic testing identified certain ESBL groups (e.g., TEM, SHV, CTX-M, OXA) in 104/687 (15%). Cure rates in this subset were similar to the overall trial results. In vitro susceptibility testing showed that some of these isolates were susceptible to ZERBAXA (MIC ≤2 mcg/mL), while some others were not susceptible (MIC >2 mcg/mL). Isolates of a specific genotype were seen in patients who were deemed to be either successes or failures.

Pediatric Patients

The cUTI pediatric trial was a randomized, double-blind multi-center, active controlled trial conducted in hospitalized patients from at least 33 weeks post-menstrual age to less than 18 years (NCT03230838; Trial 5). Eligible patients were randomized in a 3:1 ratio to IV ZERBAXA or meropenem, respectively. Patients received IV study treatment for a minimum of 3 days before an optional switch to oral step-down therapy at the discretion of the investigator to complete a total of 7 to 14 days of antibacterial therapy.

The microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population consisted of 95 patients (N=71 in the ZERBAXA group; N=24 in the meropenem group) who were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment and had an eligible uropathogen isolated from a baseline urine culture.

The median age of patients was 2.7 years and 1.6 years in the ZERBAXA and meropenem groups, respectively. In the ZERBAXA group, enrollment by age group was as follows: 12 to <18 y: n=10, 6 to <12 y: n=13, 2 to <6 y: n=14, 3 months to <2 y: n=20, birth to <3 months: n=14. Patients treated with ZERBAXA were predominantly female (56%) and White (99%). Patients treated with meropenem were predominantly female (63%) and White (100%). Most patients in the mMITT population had a diagnosis of pyelonephritis (ZERBAXA: 84.5%; meropenem: 79.2%). The most common baseline qualifying gram-negative uropathogens were Escherichia coli (ZERBAXA: 74.6%; meropenem: 87.5%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.5%; 4.2%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.0%; 8.3%).

The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of ZERBAXA. Efficacy assessments were not powered for formal hypothesis testing of between treatment group comparisons. At the TOC visit, which occurred 7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug, a favorable clinical response was defined as complete resolution or marked improvement in signs and symptoms of the cUTI or return to pre-infection signs and symptoms, such that no further antibiotic therapy (IV or oral) was required for the treatment of the cUTI. A favorable microbiological response at the TOC was defined as eradication (all uropathogens found at baseline at ≥105 were reduced to <104 CFU/mL) of baseline uropathogens from the urine culture. A summary of clinical and microbiologic response rates in the mMITT population at the TOC visit is presented in Table 19.

Table 19: Clinical and Microbiological Response Rates in a Pediatric Study of Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (Trial 5)
mMITT PopulationZERBAXA
n/N (%)
Meropenem
n/N (%)
Treatment Difference
(95% CI)*
Clinical Response Rate63/71 (88.7)23/24 (95.8)-7.3 (-18.0, 10.1)
Microbiologic Response Rate60/71 (84.5)21/24 (87.5)-3.0 (-17.1, 17.4)

* The Miettinen & Nurminen method stratified by age group with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weights was used.

14.3 Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Adult Patients

A total of 726 adult patients hospitalized with HABP/VABP were enrolled in a multinational, double-blind study comparing ZERBAXA 3 g (ceftolozane 2 g and tazobactam 1 g) intravenously every 8 hours to meropenem (1 g intravenously every 8 hours) for 8 to 14 days of therapy (NCT02070757; Trial 3). All patients had to be intubated and on mechanical ventilation at randomization.

Efficacy was assessed based on all-cause mortality at Day 28 and clinical cure, defined as complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit which occurred 7 to 14 days after the end of treatment. The analysis population was the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all randomized patients.

Following a diagnosis of HABP/VABP and prior to receipt of first dose of study drug, if required, patients could have received up to a maximum of 24 hours of active non-study antibacterial drug therapy in the 72 hours preceding the first dose of study drug. Patients who had failed prior antibacterial drug therapy for the current episode of HABP/VABP could be enrolled if the baseline lower respiratory tract (LRT) culture showed growth of a Gram-negative pathogen while the patient was on the antibacterial therapy and all other eligibility criteria were met. Empiric therapy at baseline with linezolid or other approved therapy for Gram-positive coverage was required in all patients pending baseline LRT culture results. Adjunctive Gram-negative therapy was optional and allowed for a maximum of 72 hours in centers with a prevalence of meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa more than 15%.

Of the 726 patients in the ITT population, the median age was 62 years and 44% of the population was 65 years of age and older, with 22% of the population 75 years of age and older. The majority of patients were White (83%), male (71%) and were from Eastern Europe (64%). The median APACHE II score was 17 and 33% of subjects had a baseline APACHE II score of greater than or equal to 20. All subjects were on mechanical ventilation and 519 (71%) had VABP. At randomization, 92% of subjects were in the ICU, 77% had been hospitalized for 5 days or longer, and 49% were ventilated for 5 days or longer. A total of 258 of 726 (36%) patients had CrCl less than 80 mL/min at baseline; among these, 99 (14%) had CrCl less than 50 mL/min. Patients with end-stage renal disease (CrCl less than 15 mL/min) were excluded from the trial. Approximately 13% of subjects were failing their current antibacterial drug therapy for HABP/VABP, and bacteremia was present at baseline in 15% of patients. Key comorbidities included diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at rates of 22%, 16%, and 12%, respectively. In both treatment groups, most subjects (63.1%) received between 8 and 14 days of study therapy as specified in the protocol.

Table 20 presents the results for Day 28 all-cause mortality and clinical cure at the TOC visit overall and by ventilated HABP and VABP.

Table 20: Day 28 All-cause Mortality and Clinical Cure Rates at TOC from a Phase 3 Study of Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (Trial 3; ITT Population)
EndpointZERBAXA
n/N (%)
Meropenem
n/N (%)
Treatment Difference
(95% CI)*
Day 28 All-cause Mortality87/362 (24.0)92/364 (25.3)1.1 (-5.13, 7.39)
  VABP63/263 (24.0)52/256 (20.3)-3.6 (-10.74, 3.52)
  Ventilated HABP24/99 (24.2)40/108 (37.0)12.8 (0.18, 24.75)
Clinical Cure at TOC Visit197/362 (54.4)194/364 (53.3)1.1 (-6.17, 8.29)
  VABP147/263 (55.9)146/256 (57.0)-1.1 (-9.59, 7.35)
  Ventilated HABP50/99 (50.5)48/108 (44.4)6.1 (-7.44, 19.27)

* The CI for overall treatment difference was based on the stratified Newcombe method with minimum risk weights. The CI for treatment difference of each primary diagnosis was based on the unstratified Newcombe method.

In the ITT population, Day 28 all-cause mortality and clinical cure rates in patients with CrCl greater than or equal to 150 mL/min were similar between ZERBAXA and meropenem. In patients with bacteremia at baseline, Day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 23/64 (35.9%) for ZERBAXA-treated patients and 13/41 (31.7%) for meropenem-treated patients; clinical cure rates were 30/64 (46.9%) and 15/41 (36.6%), respectively.

Per pathogen Day 28 all-cause mortality and clinical cure at TOC were assessed in the microbiologic intention to treat population (mITT), which consisted of all randomized subjects who had a baseline lower respiratory tract (LRT) pathogen that was susceptible to both study treatments. In the mITT population, Klebsiella pneumoniae (113/425, 26.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (103/425, 24.2%) were the most prevalent pathogens isolated from baseline LRT cultures.

Day 28 all-cause mortality and clinical cure rates at TOC by pathogen in the mITT population are presented in Table 21. In the mITT population, clinical cure rates in patients with a Gram-negative pathogen at baseline were 139/215 (64.7%) for ZERBAXA and 115/204 (56.4%) for meropenem, respectively.

Table 21: Day 28 All-cause Mortality and Clinical Cure Rates at TOC by Baseline Pathogen from a Phase 3 Study of Hospital-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia and Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (Trial 3; mITT population)
Baseline Pathogen CategoryDay 28 All-cause MortalityClinical Cure at TOC
  Baseline PathogenZERBAXA
n/N (%)
Meropenem
n/N (%)
ZERBAXA
n/N (%)
Meropenem
n/N (%)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa12/47 (25.5)10/56 (17.9)29/47 (61.7)34/56 (60.7)
Enterobacterales27/161 (16.8)42/157 (26.8)103/161 (64.0)87/157 (55.4)
  Enterobacter cloacae 2/15 (13.3)8/14 (57.1)8/15 (53.3)4/14 (28.6)
  Escherichia coli 10/50 (20.0)11/42 (26.2)32/50 (64.0)26/42 (61.9)
  Klebsiella oxytoca 3/14 (21.4)3/12 (25.0)9/14 (64.3)7/12 (58.3)
  Klebsiella pneumoniae 7/51 (13.7)13/62 (21.0)34/51 (66.7)39/62 (62.9)
  Proteus mirabilis 5/22 (22.7)5/18 (27.8)13/22 (59.1)11/18 (61.1)
  Serratia marcescens 3/14 (21.4)1/12 (8.3)8/14 (57.1)7/12 (58.3)
Haemophilus influenzae0/20 (0)2/15 (13.3)17/20 (85.0)8/15 (53.3)

In a subset of Enterobacterales isolates from both arms of the trial that met pre-specified criteria for beta-lactam susceptibility, genotypic testing identified certain ESBL groups (e.g., TEM, SHV, CTX-M, OXA) in 101/425 (23.8%). Day 28 all-cause mortality and clinical cure rates in this subset were similar to the overall trial results.

16 HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING

HOW SUPPLIED SECTION

16.1 How Supplied

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

ZERBAXA 1.5 g (ceftolozane and tazobactam) for injection is supplied in single-dose vials containing ceftolozane 1 g (equivalent to 1.147 g of ceftolozane sulfate) and tazobactam 0.5 g (equivalent to 0.537 g of tazobactam sodium) per vial. Vials are supplied in cartons containing 10 vials.

(NDC 67919-030-01)

16.2 Storage and Handling

STORAGE AND HANDLING SECTION

ZERBAXA vials should be stored refrigerated at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) and protected from light. Storage after reconstitution and dilution is described elsewhere in the labeling [see Dosage and Administration (2.7)].

17 PATIENT COUNSELING INFORMATION

INFORMATION FOR PATIENTS SECTION

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Serious Allergic Reactions

Advise patient that allergic reactions, including serious allergic reactions, could occur and that serious reactions require immediate treatment. Ask patient about any previous hypersensitivity reactions to ZERBAXA, other beta-lactams (including cephalosporins) or other allergens [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2)].

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Potentially Serious Diarrhea

Advise patient that diarrhea is a common problem caused by antibacterial drugs. Sometimes, frequent watery or bloody diarrhea may occur and may be a sign of a more serious intestinal infection. If severe watery or bloody diarrhea develops, tell patient to contact his or her healthcare provider [see Warnings and Precautions (5.3)].

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Antibacterial Resistance

Patients should be counseled that antibacterial drugs including ZERBAXA should only be used to treat bacterial infections. They do not treat viral infections (e.g., the common cold). When ZERBAXA is prescribed to treat a bacterial infection, patients should be told that although it is common to feel better early in the course of therapy, the medication should be taken exactly as directed. Skipping doses or not completing the full course of therapy may (1) decrease the effectiveness of the immediate treatment and (2) increase the likelihood that bacteria will develop resistance and will not be treatable by ZERBAXA or other antibacterial drugs in the future [see Warnings and Precautions (5.4)].

SPL UNCLASSIFIED SECTION

Manufactured for: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Rahway, NJ 07065, USA

Manufactured by: Steri-Pharma, LLC
Syracuse, NY 13202, USA

For patent information: www.msd.com/research/patent

Copyright © 2015-2026 Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, and its affiliates.
All rights reserved.

uspi-mk7625a-iv-2605r009

PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL - 1.5 g Vial Carton

PACKAGE LABEL.PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL

NDC 67919-030-01
10 Single-Dose vials

Zerbaxa®
1.5 g per vial*
(ceftolozane and tazobactam) for injection

*Ceftolozane 1 gram (equivalent to 1.147 g ceftolozane sulfate)
and Tazobactam 0.5 g (equivalent to 0.537 g tazobactam sodium)

For Intravenous Infusion

Rx only
Sterile

PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL - 1.5 g Vial Carton
PRINCIPAL DISPLAY PANEL - 1.5 g Vial Carton

DailyMed RxNorm Mappings#

RxCUI, RxNorm string, TTY table
RxCUIRxNorm stringTTYSPL version
1597615ceftolozane / tazobactam 1.5 GM InjectionPSN23
1597620Zerbaxa 1.5 GM InjectionPSN23
1597620ceftolozane 1000 MG / tazobactam 500 MG Injection [Zerbaxa]SBD23
1597615ceftolozane 1000 MG / tazobactam 500 MG InjectionSCD23
1597615ceftolozane (as ceftolozane sulfate) 1 GM / tazobactam (as tazobactam sodium) 500 MG InjectionSY23
1597615ceftolozane 1 GM / tazobactam 0.5 GM InjectionSY23
1597620Zerbaxa 1.5 GM InjectionSY23

DailyMed Pharmacologic Classes#

Class, Version, Type table
ClassVersionTypeEffective
CEFTOLOZANE Pharmacologic Class Indexing2Indexing - Pharmacologic Class20180813
TAZOBACTAM Pharmacologic Class Indexing3Indexing - Pharmacologic Class20220114

DailyMed Product Concepts#

Product concept, Relation, Version table
Product conceptRelationVersionEffective
5fa255cf-091e-4504-8ebf-eef4259776e8Product name120260112
a6bfe911-d09e-4049-bcde-a3213184a72cProduct name820240501
61877847-a958-4874-a7cf-2bbeff51a37bProduct name220180717
0ca1d589-929b-4b33-bc5b-1d84abdafa6aProduct name120150324
fc363c46-397b-4476-ac0f-70e43e8e4592Product name120150324
e0d9b1cf-1fe5-42a8-b30f-70b3a7bd8d22Product name120150316
1681bc73-b05f-12c3-1075-382ae39f449cProduct name120140508

FDA-Initiated Inactive NDC Indexing#

DailyMed Package Descriptions#

Package NDC, Product, Description table
Package NDCProductDescriptionFormQuantityStrengthSPL version
67919-030-01ZERBAXA10 in 1 CARTONINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED,1023
67919-030-01ZERBAXA10 mL in 1 VIAL, SINGLE-DOSEINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED,1023

DailyMed Billing Units#

Package NDC, Billing unit, Product NDC table
Package NDCBilling unitProduct NDCDailyMed indexing SPLSPL versionEffective
67919-030-01EA - Each67919-0309c8d4f34-1f06-49b8-8c78-f9eee68aad7212015-01-05

DailyMed Socrata Ingredients#

Ingredient, Type, UNII table
IngredientTypeUNIISPL versionUploaded
ceftolozane sulfateACTIVE INGREDIENT7R247U84HY4
tazobactam sodiumACTIVE INGREDIENTUXA545ABTT4
ceftolozaneACTIVE MOIETY37A4IES95Q4
tazobactamACTIVE MOIETYSE10G96M8W4
anhydrous citric acidINACTIVE INGREDIENTXF417D3PSL4
ArginineINACTIVE INGREDIENT94ZLA3W45F4
sodium chlorideINACTIVE INGREDIENT451W47IQ8X4

Products#

Every source-derived product name is available through these pages.

DailyMed product names page 1 of 1 · 9 matching rows.

NDC Codes#

Product NDC, Package NDC table
Product NDCPackage NDC
67919-03067919-030-01

Ingredients#

Every source-derived ingredient row is available through these pages.

DailyMed ingredient rows page 1 of 1 · 5 matching rows.

Source Document#

Source XML

Older Hydrated Versions#

Version, Effective date, Source table
VersionEffective dateSourceHydrated
222024-11-04monthly-update2026-06-03 17:42:38
202024-11-04full-release2026-05-31 21:17:00

Inactive ingredient matches#

Inactive Ingredient Database values describe FDA-listed use contexts. The match method and ambiguity count are shown because ingredient names, routes, and dosage forms are not always unique. Browse recovered IID releases and source provenance.

Inactive ingredient links page 1 of 1 · 6 matching rows.

DailyMed ingredient, IID ingredient, UNII table
DailyMed ingredientIID ingredientUNIIDosage form / routePotencyMaximum daily exposureMatch
anhydrous citric acidANHYDROUS CITRIC ACIDXF417D3PSLINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED, FOR SOLUTION / INTRAVENOUS414 mgExact identifier — unii+route+dosage form
2 equally ranked IID candidates
sodium chlorideSODIUM CHLORIDE451W47IQ8XINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED, FOR SOLUTION / INTRAVENOUS1800 mgExact identifier — unii+route+dosage form
2 equally ranked IID candidates
ArginineARGININE94ZLA3W45FINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED, FOR SOLUTION / INTRAVENOUS6240 mgExact identifier — unii+route+dosage form
2 equally ranked IID candidates
anhydrous citric acidANHYDROUS CITRIC ACIDXF417D3PSLINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED, FOR SOLUTION / INTRAVENOUS414 mgExact identifier — unii+route+dosage form
2 equally ranked IID candidates
ArginineARGININE94ZLA3W45FINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED, FOR SOLUTION / INTRAVENOUS6240 mgExact identifier — unii+route+dosage form
2 equally ranked IID candidates
sodium chlorideSODIUM CHLORIDE451W47IQ8XINJECTION, POWDER, LYOPHILIZED, FOR SOLUTION / INTRAVENOUS1800 mgExact identifier — unii+route+dosage form
2 equally ranked IID candidates

Orange Book application contexts#

All distinct exact application/product contexts derived from this label’s complete NDC list are paginated below.

Orange Book application contexts page 1 of 1 · 1 matching rows.

Source provenance: Browse the complete Orange Book source catalog · source snapshot 43.

Orange Book products#

Current product rows page 1 of 1 · 1 matching rows.

Application-product, Trade name, Ingredient table
Application-productTrade nameIngredientStrengthDosage form / routeTE codesRLD / RSApproval date
N206829-001ZERBAXACEFTOLOZANE SULFATE; TAZOBACTAM SODIUMEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19

Orange Book patents#

Current patent rows page 1 of 1 · 56 matching rows.

Application-product, Patent, Expiration table
Application-productPatentExpirationUse codeCoverage / statusSubmission date
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-1676Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-3360Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-3361Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-36Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4542Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4543Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4547Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4550Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-0017129232*PED2028-11-15Pediatric extension
N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-25652019-07-01
N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-25662019-07-01
N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-45422019-07-01
N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-45432019-07-01
N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-25652019-07-01
N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-25662019-07-01
N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-45422019-07-01
N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-45432019-07-01
N206829-00110028963*PED2033-03-07Pediatric extension
N206829-0019724353*PED2033-03-07Pediatric extension
N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-16722019-10-21
N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-26312019-10-21
N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-33602019-10-21
N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-33612019-10-21
N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-45462019-10-21
N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-45472019-10-21
N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-33352022-04-11
N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-33362022-04-11
N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-45422022-04-11
N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-45432022-04-11
N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-16722015-03-31
N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-16732015-03-31
N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-33602015-03-31
N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-33612015-03-31
N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-45472015-03-31
N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-45502015-03-31
N206829-00193207402034-03-14Drug product2016-05-25
N206829-00198729062034-03-14Drug product2018-02-08
N206829-00189068982034-05-28Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-13
N206829-001103764962034-09-09U-26102019-08-30
N206829-001103764962034-09-09U-26112019-08-30
N206829-001103764962034-09-09U-45482019-08-30
N206829-001103764962034-09-09U-45492019-08-30
N206829-001109330532034-09-09U-30902021-03-23
N206829-001109330532034-09-09U-30912021-03-23
N206829-001109330532034-09-09U-45442021-03-23
N206829-001109330532034-09-09U-45452021-03-23
N206829-00110420841*PED2034-09-14Pediatric extension
N206829-00111278622*PED2034-09-14Pediatric extension
N206829-0018968753*PED2034-09-14Pediatric extension
N206829-0019320740*PED2034-09-14Pediatric extension
N206829-0019872906*PED2034-09-14Pediatric extension
N206829-0018906898*PED2034-11-28Pediatric extension
N206829-00110376496*PED2035-03-09Pediatric extension
N206829-00110933053*PED2035-03-09Pediatric extension
N206829-001101251492035-08-14Drug product2018-11-28
N206829-00110125149*PED2036-02-14Pediatric extension

Orange Book exclusivity#

Current exclusivity rows page 1 of 1 · 2 matching rows.

Application-product, Exclusivity code, Expiration table
Application-productExclusivity codeExpiration
N206829-001NPP2029-05-12
N206829-001PED2029-11-12

Observed Orange Book product history#

Observed FDA ZIP history: Each table is queried independently by exact application/product key from successfully parsed Orange Book snapshots. Capture times identify archived source observations; absence or a change between snapshots is not inferred. FDA publication files that were not recoverable as structured ZIP data are not represented as states.

Product history page 1 of 2 · 43 observed states.

Captured, Edition, Application-product table
CapturedEditionApplication-productTrade nameStrengthDosage form / routeProduct TE source textRLD / RSApproval dateSource SHA-256
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-1984e616aacf4f…
2026-08-18 06:07:402026-07N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19caaa826d4ba7…
2026-02-19 14:30 UTC2026-02N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19011fe1cb6892…
2025-12-14 10:44 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2025-12N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-1931067a03dcf5…
2025-08-23 18:47 UTC2025-08N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-196a471c1ec25d…
2025-03-22 03:13 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2025-03N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19fd3edfee7708…
2025-02-26 10:13 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2025-02N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19b8a1b40f171c…
2025-01-19 17:59 UTC · 7 captures of this ZIP2025-01N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-1903ed91905a0d…
2024-12-13 21:23 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-12N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-192680178bc6a6…
2024-09-14 05:58 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-09N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-195bbf6a4d5a75…
2024-11-08 22:44 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-11N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19d8e5a09893c0…
2024-10-29 15:01 UTC2024-10N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19d06236e962d9…
2024-08-13 05:28 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-08N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-1979d66fd596c7…
2024-07-13 05:37 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-07N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19301d65b070ca…
2024-06-18 03:08 UTC · 5 captures of this ZIP2024-06N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-191e350fbaab3a…
2024-05-31 18:47 UTC2024-05N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-198072bd15b7f6…
2022-06-29 02:47 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2022-06N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-195c6f7cd8ea54…
2022-04-08 23:34 UTC2022-04N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-195d02ea3f76ae…
2022-04-04 05:41 UTC2022-04N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-194b0b4de00fa7…
2019-12-13 00:20 UTC2019-12N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-1974a2ff9319b5…
2022-03-09 01:35 UTC2022-03N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19bb7c543d1eb4…
2021-12-28 21:50 UTC2021-12N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19782e0a99824c…
2021-05-05 16:15 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2021-05N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-1987673890dc5c…
2021-03-12 10:30 UTC2021-03N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-195aa47cf7b7d7…
2020-12-22 03:56 UTC2020-12N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-198869cabd3fbd…
2020-11-12 02:37 UTC2020-11N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19c0c555d07b60…
2019-12-14 00:12 UTC2019-12N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-193f01610625f2…
2019-09-15 20:21 UTC2019-09N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19b00525d2431f…
2019-07-19 19:46 UTC2019-07N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19ea99ee380514…
2024-03-16 18:09 UTC · 4 captures of this ZIP2024-03N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-196a51e52b5d6a…
2024-02-18 07:12 UTC2024-02N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-191c564ffb4f44…
2023-12-20 04:57 UTC2023-12N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19ea1830bbd6c7…
2023-11-28 05:40 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2023-11N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19a72a2bbeb626…
2023-10-25 00:34 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2023-10N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-199b2671bbb829…
2023-07-15 15:27 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2023-07N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19a67488948f0b…
2023-06-13 01:57 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2023-06N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-193f0d92c62455…
2023-05-13 08:27 UTC2023-05N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19053a50430f4f…
2023-01-26 05:58 UTC2023-01N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-193bdfa0b2c4d7…
2022-11-12 20:34 UTC · 5 captures of this ZIP2022-11N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-193a93d1ddd44b…
2022-10-28 04:53 UTC2022-10N206829-001ZERBAXAEQ 1GM BASE/VIAL;EQ 0.5GM BASE/VIALPOWDER / INTRAVENOUSRLD, RS2014-12-19f41ea6bd6efb…

Observed Orange Book patent history#

Patent history page 1 of 30 · 1,164 observed states.

Captured, Edition, Application-product table
CapturedEditionApplication-productPatentExpirationUse codeCoverage / statusSubmission dateSource SHA-256
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-36Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-1676Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-3361Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-3360Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4550Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4547Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4542Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00171292322028-05-15U-4543Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-0017129232*PED2028-11-15Pediatric extension84e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-25662019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-25652019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-45422019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001100289632032-09-07U-45432019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-25652019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-25662019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-45422019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00197243532032-09-07U-45432019-07-0184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00110028963*PED2033-03-07Pediatric extension84e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-0019724353*PED2033-03-07Pediatric extension84e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-26312019-10-2184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-16722019-10-2184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-33612019-10-2184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-33602019-10-2184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-45462019-10-2184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001104208412034-03-14U-45472019-10-2184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-33352022-04-1184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-33362022-04-1184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-45422022-04-1184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001112786222034-03-14U-45432022-04-1184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-16732015-03-3184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-16722015-03-3184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-33612015-03-3184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-33602015-03-3184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-45502015-03-3184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00189687532034-03-14U-45472015-03-3184e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00193207402034-03-14Drug product2016-05-2584e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00198729062034-03-14Drug product2018-02-0884e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-00189068982034-05-28Drug substance, Drug product2015-01-1384e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001103764962034-09-09U-26112019-08-3084e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001103764962034-09-09U-26102019-08-3084e616aacf4f…

Observed Orange Book exclusivity history#

Exclusivity history page 1 of 3 · 103 observed states.

Captured, Edition, Application-product table
CapturedEditionApplication-productExclusivity codeExpirationSource SHA-256
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001NPP2029-05-1284e616aacf4f…
2026-09-14 22:38:342026-08N206829-001PED2029-11-1284e616aacf4f…
2026-08-18 06:07:402026-07N206829-001NPP2029-05-12caaa826d4ba7…
2026-08-18 06:07:402026-07N206829-001PED2029-11-12caaa826d4ba7…
2025-12-14 10:44 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2025-12N206829-001NPP2025-04-2131067a03dcf5…
2025-08-23 18:47 UTC2025-08N206829-001NPP2025-04-216a471c1ec25d…
2025-03-22 03:13 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2025-03N206829-001NPP2025-04-21fd3edfee7708…
2025-02-26 10:13 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2025-02N206829-001NPP2025-04-21b8a1b40f171c…
2025-01-19 17:59 UTC · 7 captures of this ZIP2025-01N206829-001NCE2019-12-1903ed91905a0d…
2025-01-19 17:59 UTC · 7 captures of this ZIP2025-01N206829-001GAIN2024-12-1903ed91905a0d…
2025-01-19 17:59 UTC · 7 captures of this ZIP2025-01N206829-001NPP2025-04-2103ed91905a0d…
2024-12-13 21:23 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-12N206829-001NCE2019-12-192680178bc6a6…
2024-12-13 21:23 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-12N206829-001GAIN2024-12-192680178bc6a6…
2024-12-13 21:23 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-12N206829-001NPP2025-04-212680178bc6a6…
2024-09-14 05:58 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-09N206829-001NCE2019-12-195bbf6a4d5a75…
2024-09-14 05:58 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-09N206829-001GAIN2024-12-195bbf6a4d5a75…
2024-09-14 05:58 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-09N206829-001NPP2025-04-215bbf6a4d5a75…
2024-11-08 22:44 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-11N206829-001NCE2019-12-19d8e5a09893c0…
2024-11-08 22:44 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-11N206829-001GAIN2024-12-19d8e5a09893c0…
2024-11-08 22:44 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-11N206829-001NPP2025-04-21d8e5a09893c0…
2024-10-29 15:01 UTC2024-10N206829-001NCE2019-12-19d06236e962d9…
2024-10-29 15:01 UTC2024-10N206829-001GAIN2024-12-19d06236e962d9…
2024-10-29 15:01 UTC2024-10N206829-001NPP2025-04-21d06236e962d9…
2024-08-13 05:28 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-08N206829-001NCE2019-12-1979d66fd596c7…
2024-08-13 05:28 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-08N206829-001GAIN2024-12-1979d66fd596c7…
2024-08-13 05:28 UTC · 3 captures of this ZIP2024-08N206829-001NPP2025-04-2179d66fd596c7…
2024-07-13 05:37 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-07N206829-001NCE2019-12-19301d65b070ca…
2024-07-13 05:37 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-07N206829-001GAIN2024-12-19301d65b070ca…
2024-07-13 05:37 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2024-07N206829-001NPP2025-04-21301d65b070ca…
2024-06-18 03:08 UTC · 5 captures of this ZIP2024-06N206829-001NCE2019-12-191e350fbaab3a…
2024-06-18 03:08 UTC · 5 captures of this ZIP2024-06N206829-001GAIN2024-12-191e350fbaab3a…
2024-06-18 03:08 UTC · 5 captures of this ZIP2024-06N206829-001NPP2025-04-211e350fbaab3a…
2024-05-31 18:47 UTC2024-05N206829-001NCE2019-12-198072bd15b7f6…
2024-05-31 18:47 UTC2024-05N206829-001GAIN2024-12-198072bd15b7f6…
2024-05-31 18:47 UTC2024-05N206829-001NPP2025-04-218072bd15b7f6…
2022-06-29 02:47 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2022-06N206829-001NCE2019-12-195c6f7cd8ea54…
2022-06-29 02:47 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2022-06N206829-001GAIN2024-12-195c6f7cd8ea54…
2022-06-29 02:47 UTC · 2 captures of this ZIP2022-06N206829-001NPP2025-04-215c6f7cd8ea54…
2022-04-08 23:34 UTC2022-04N206829-001NCE2019-12-195d02ea3f76ae…
2022-04-08 23:34 UTC2022-04N206829-001GAIN2024-12-195d02ea3f76ae…

openFDA label cross-check#

OpenFDA label data provides additional search and identifier links. DailyMed’s Structured Product Label is the canonical label on FDA.report. Matching records are deduplicated before they are shown below.

Matched openFDA labels page 1 of 1 · 1 matching rows.

Brand, Generic, Manufacturer table
BrandGenericManufacturerSPL set IDEffective dateAvailable safety fieldsJoin
ZERBAXACEFTOLOZANE AND TAZOBACTAMMerck Sharp & Dohme LLC70ac1d90-eff3-4f0b-9f46-5846c571b32f2026-05-12Warnings, Adverse reactionsExact identifier
ndc (package): 67919-030-01
ndc (product): 67919-030
ndc11 (package): 67919003001
spl id: 23d9b7be-abf3-4ca6-bce8-d80643a708e7
spl set id: 70ac1d90-eff3-4f0b-9f46-5846c571b32f

Reported adverse events (FAERS/openFDA)#

Adverse event summaries are temporarily unavailable. Other product information remains available.